岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 789-797.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0698

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究

杨少朋1,杨爱武1, 2,许福军3   

  1. 1. 东华大学 环境科学与工程学院,上海 201620;2. 东华大学 纤维材料改性国家重点实验室,上海 201620; 3. 东华大学 纺织面料技术教育部重点实验室,上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-03 接受日期:2024-08-14 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 作者简介:杨少朋,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事软土力学性质及地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: yangsp_tjcj@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51978440,No.42177119,No.42377141);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.2232021A-07)。

Vacuum preloading reinforcement of soft dredger soil by modified fiber drainage plate

YANG Shao-peng1, YANG Ai-wu1, 2, XU Fu-jun3   

  1. 1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Fiber Material Modification, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Textile Fabric Technology, Ministry of Education, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2024-06-03 Accepted:2024-08-14 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978440, 42177119, 42377141) and the Special Fund for Fundamental Scientific Research Business Expenses of Central Universities (2232021A-07).

摘要: 针对目前废弃纤维资源化利用和真空预压加固吹填软土地基效果欠佳等问题,在废弃纤维改性处理的基础上,研制出改性纤维塑料排水板,利用梯度比试验和室内真空预压模型试验,对比分析了不同改性纤维滤膜淤堵特性和不同类型排水板真空预压加固吹填软土效果及规律。试验结果表明:改性纤维滤膜孔径超过119 μm防淤堵效果更好;改性纤维排水板在沉降量、出水量、真空度、孔隙水压力、土样含水率和十字板剪切强度等指标上都优于普通塑料排水板,且滤膜孔径为119 μm的排水板加固效果最佳,相较于普通塑料排水板(分体式),其成本较低的同时,含水率平均降低6.4%,十字板剪切强度平均提高了7.8 kPa,充分体现了改性纤维排水板在工程应用中不仅具有良好的加固效果,还能降低成本,符合国家基础设施建设和经济绿色可持续发展理念。

关键词: 改性纤维排水板, 真空预压, 吹填软土, 梯度比, 淤堵

Abstract:

Addressing the current issues of poor resource utilization of waste fibers and ineffective vacuum preloading reinforcement for dredger fill, we developed a modified fiber plastic drainage plate based on the modification treatment of waste fibers. Using gradient ratio tests and indoor vacuum preloading model tests, we compared and analyzed the clogging characteristics of various modified fiber filter membranes, as well as the effects and patterns of vacuum preloading using different types of drainage plates on soft soils. The results show that the anti-clogging effect of the modified fiber filter membrane with a pore size of more than 119 µm is better. The modified fiber drainage plate is superior to the ordinary split-type plastic drainage plate in terms of settlement, water output, vacuum degree, pore water pressure, soil moisture content, and vane shear strength. The drainage plate with a filter membrane pore size of 119 µm exhibits the best reinforcement effect. Compared to the ordinary split-type plastic drainage plate, it has a lower cost, reduces moisture content by an average of 6.4%, and increases vane shear strength by an average of 7.8 kPa. This fully demonstrates that the modified fiber drainage plate not only provides excellent reinforcement in engineering applications but also reduces costs, aligning with the national goals for infrastructure construction and economic green sustainable development.

Key words: modified fiber drainage plate, vacuum preloading, soft dredging soil, gradient ratio, congestion

中图分类号: TU447
[1] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[2] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[3] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[4] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[5] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[6] 胡利文, 洪义, 王德咏, . 水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3059-3070.
[7] 杜春雪, 徐超, 杨阳, 彭善涛, 张鹏程, . 无纺土工织物过滤黏土的反滤特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 275-281.
[8] 张雷, 吕延栋, 王炳辉, 金丹丹, 竺明星, 方晨, . 絮凝−真空−电渗联合加固滩涂软土的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2383-2390.
[9] 雷华阳, 王磊, 刘景锦, 王鹏, 章纬地, 薄钰, . 化学改性联合真空预压法加固吹填土试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 891-900.
[10] 李长辉, 武航, 程国勇, 陈宇, 金敏, 常雷, . 不同排水板真空预压软土加固对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2819-2827.
[11] 雷华阳, 王鹏, 刘旭, 王磊, . 基于气体运移规律的增压式真空预压法 加固机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 943-953.
[12] 胡利文, 刘志军, . 真空预压加固土体变形机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 790-799.
[13] 孙宏磊, 陆逸, 潘晓东, 史吏, 蔡袁强, . 真空预压作用下初始含水率 对疏浚淤泥固结影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3029-3040.
[14] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[15] 王东星, 唐弈锴, 伍林峰, . 疏浚淤泥化学絮凝−真空预压深度脱水效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3929-3938.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!