岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 930-942.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00554

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究

周光远1,干飞1, 2,郑刚2,周海祚2,王宏1, 毕靖1,刘彪3,张元胤3   

  1. 1. 贵州大学 土木工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072;3. 贵州送变电有限责任公司,贵州 贵阳 550000
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-25 接受日期:2024-10-14 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 作者简介:周光远,男,2000年生,硕士,主要从事桩基础和边坡稳定性研究。E-mail: 13416330651@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52164001);贵州省科技支撑计划基金会(No.[2021]–general511)。

Calculation method of negative skin friction for end-bearing piles based on soil deformation

ZHOU Guang-yuan1, GAN Fei1, 2, ZHENG Gang2, ZHOU Hai-zuo2, WANG Hong1, BI Jing1, LIU Biao3, ZHANG Yuan-yin3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Guizhou Power Transmission and Transformer Company Limited, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China
  • Received:2024-08-25 Accepted:2024-10-14 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52164001) and the Science and Technology Support Plan Foundation of Guizhou Province ([2021]–general511).

摘要: 施加较大的附加荷载会引起桩周土体变形,从而产生一种向下的拖曳力,通常称为负摩阻力。这种现象显著降低了桩的极限轴向承载力。因此,精确计算负摩阻力对桩基设计至关重要。为准确计算作用于桩上的负摩阻力,确定桩−土界面在不同土体变形条件下的应力状态是至关重要的。然而,许多现有方法仅考虑剪切面上的峰值或残余应力,而忽略了土体变形的全过程应力状态。这种方法往往会高估负摩阻力。提出了一种新的负摩阻力计算方法,该方法考虑了土体变形过程中完整的应力状态变化(包括破坏前区及峰值应力、破坏后区及残余应力状态),利用双曲力学模型描述土体变形与应力之间的关系。在此基础上,将土体变形行为划分为3种不同的形式,并分别针对每种形式探讨了负摩阻力的空间分布特性。此外,还研究了不同土体参数对负摩阻力空间分布的影响。最后,通过与现场实测数据对比,验证了新负摩阻力计算方法的准确性和适用性,可为实际工程提供参考。

关键词: 土体变形, 负摩阻力, 桩基础, 应力状态, 双曲力学模型

Abstract: The application of a significant additional load induces soil deformation around the pile, generating a downward drag force, commonly referred to as negative skin friction. This phenomenon significantly reduces the pile's ultimate axial load capacity. Therefore, precise estimation of negative skin friction is crucial for pile design. To accurately calculate the negative skin friction acting on the pile, it is essential to determine the stress states at the pile-soil interface under varying soil deformations. However, many existing methodologies solely consider peak or residual stresses on the shear plane, neglecting the process of stress changes in soil deformation. This approach often results in an overestimation of negative skin friction. In this investigation, we propose a novel method for calculating negative skin friction that comprehensively accounts for the whole process of stress state alterations occurring during soil deformation (pre-failure zone and peak stress, post-failure zone and residual stress state) and describes the relationship between soil deformation and stress using a hyperbolic mechanical model. On this basis, soil deformation behavior is classified into three distinct forms. The spatial distribution characteristics for negative skin friction were then explored individually for each form. Additionally, the influence of different soil parameters on the spatial distribution of negative skin friction was also investigated. Finally, the accuracy and applicability of the new negative skin friction calculation method is validated through comparison with field measurement data. It can be used as a reference for practical engineering.

Key words: soil deformation, negative skin friction, pile foundation, stress state, hyperbolic mechanical model

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[2] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[3] 田雷, 谢强, 段军, 陶富涛, 班宇鑫, 傅翔, 晏彬淇, . 三向斜锚短桩基础拉拔荷载作用下桩锚节点的受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[4] 高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[5] 季慧, 彭宇, 吴则祥, 涂冬媚, . 砂土中吸力筒基础抗拔数值模拟研究: 系泊深度效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2187-2194.
[6] 李绍毅. 采用有限元+边界元方法研究非饱和地基中群桩基础的动力阻抗[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 895-907.
[7] 张会豪, 邱子源, 金伟, 张丹, 罗玉龙, . 反滤压重及埋深对深厚覆盖层允许坡降影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 769-776.
[8] 邓世邦, 罗威力. 裹覆隔振层的实心桩纵向振动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3081-3094.
[9] 陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[10] 张鸿朋, 马芹永, 黄坤, 马冬冬, 姚兆明, 张发, . 冻结砂不同应力路径三轴试验强度和变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1477-1486.
[11] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
[12] 闫志晓, 李雨润, 王东升, 王永志, . 覆水砂土场地中桥梁群桩基础地震响应离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 861-872.
[13] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[14] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[15] 彭文哲, 赵明华, 杨超炜, 赵衡, . 斜坡桩水平循环特性模型试验及有限杆单元解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 381-391.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!