岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1071-1083.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0756CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0756

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑滤失效应的煤层水力压裂与裂隙扩展关系研究

王刚1, 2,王恩茂1,隆清明3,徐浩1, 2,陈雪畅1,刘昆轮4   

  1. 1.山东科技大学 安全与环境工程学院,山东 青岛 266590; 2.山东科技大学 矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,山东 青岛 266590; 3.中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司,重庆 400000;4.国家能源集团新疆能源有限责任公司,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830000
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-18 接受日期:2024-12-02 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 作者简介:王刚,男,1984年生,博士(后),教授,博士生导师,主要从事煤岩渗流工程及其防灾应用研究。E-mail: gang.wang@sdust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52174194);国家自然科学基金青年项目(No. 52404227)

Relationship between hydraulic fracturing and fracture propagation in coal seams considering filtration effect

WANG Gang1, 2, WANG En-mao1, LONG Qing-ming3, XU Hao1, 2, CHEN Xue-chang1, LIU Kun-lun4   

  1. 1. College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. CCTEG Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing 400000, China; 4. National Energy Group Xinjiang Energy Co., Ltd., Urumqi, Xinjiang 830000, China
  • Received:2024-06-18 Accepted:2024-12-02 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174194) and the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China (52404227).

摘要: 煤体是多孔介质结构,水力压裂过程中液体会沿原生孔裂隙流失,即滤失效应,降低水力压裂施工效果。同时,煤层水力压裂压力变化与裂隙扩展之间的对应关系没有形成体系,无法准确判断水力压裂对煤体的损伤情况。为此,以乌东煤矿为研究背景,采用理论分析、实验室试验以及现场试验的技术手段,首先,以岩石力学圆孔问题围岩应力分析理论和煤体渗流理论为基础,结合孔壁应力集中诱发拉伸破裂准则理论,分析考虑滤失条件下的水力压裂起裂机制;其次,开展急倾斜顶煤水力压裂试验,依据试验煤样裂隙扩展情况,判断急倾斜顶煤压力曲线与煤岩体的破断关系;再次,开展现场水力压裂试验,进一步判断现场压力曲线与顶煤破断之间的关系;最后,总结分析出4种压力曲线演化规律,作为判断煤岩体水力压裂效果的依据。研究结果表明:当钻孔内部注水压力达到煤岩抗拉强度相等的拉应力时,孔壁出现首次开裂。水力压裂过程中,注水流量必须大于滤失量,且注水速率越大,憋压过程所用时间越短。压力曲线可划分为4种类型:①一次起裂型,②裂隙导通型,③流体滤失型,④二次起裂型。在压裂过程中流体滤失型占比越小压裂效果越优。该研究结果能够为现场水力压裂对煤体损伤效果提供判断依据。

关键词: 水力压裂, 急倾斜煤层, 注水压力, 原生孔裂隙, 滤失效应

Abstract: Coal is a porous medium structure. During the hydraulic fracturing process, fluids may escape along pre-existing pores and fractures, known as filtration effect, which reduces the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing operations. Additionally, there is no established system for the relationship between pressure changes during coal seam hydraulic fracturing and fracture propagation, making it impossible to accurately assess the damage caused by hydraulic fracturing to coal. To address this issue, the Wudong Coal Mine is chosen as the research background, and theoretical analysis, laboratory experiments, and on-site tests are conducted. Firstly, the initiation mechanism of hydraulic fracturing under loss conditions is analyzed based on the stress analysis theory of surrounding rock in rock mechanics circular hole problems, coal seepage theory, and the theory of tensile fracture criterion induced by stress concentration on hole walls. Secondly, an experiment of hydraulic fracturing for steeply inclined top coal is conducted to determine the relationship between the pressure curve of steeply inclined top coal and the fracture of coal rock mass according to the crack propagation situation of the experimental coal sample. Thirdly, an on-site hydraulic fracturing test is carried out to further determine the relationship between the on-site pressure curve and the fracture of top coal. Finally, four types of pressure curve evolution patterns are summarized as a basis for judging the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing in coal rock mass. The research results show that when the internal water injection pressure in the borehole reaches the tensile strength equal to that of the coal rock, the first crack appears at the borehole wall. During the hydraulic fracturing process, the water injection flow rate must be greater than the leakage rate, and the higher the water injection rate, the shorter the pressurization process duration. The pressure curves can be categorized into four types: (1) single initiation type, (2) fracture connection type, (3) fluid loss type, and (4) secondary initiation type. A smaller proportion of fluid loss type during the fracturing process indicates a better fracturing effect. These findings provide a basis for judging the damage effect of hydraulic fracturing on coal bodies on-site.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing, steeply inclined coal seams, injection pressure, primary pores and fractures, filtration effect

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 唐梅荣, 张广清, 张敏, . 多水平井立体化水力压裂缝网空间分布特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2449-2458.
[2] 申林方, 华涛, 王志良, 李松波, 陈骞. 参数空间变异性对岩石水力压裂裂隙扩展形态的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1294-1302.
[3] 刘宇鹏, 常鑫, 杨春和, 郭印同, 侯振坤, 李双明, 贾长贵, . 走滑应力特征下川南深层页岩高温真三轴压裂物理模拟试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3104-3116.
[4] 陈骞, 王志良, 申林方, 华涛, 李邵军, 徐则民, . 基于热力耦合的近场动力学方法高温岩石水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2502-2514.
[5] 吕茂淋, 朱珍德, 周露明, 葛鑫梁, . 基于相场法的预制双裂隙岩体水力压裂扩展数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1850-1862.
[6] 华涛, 申林方, 王志良, 李泽, 徐则民. 基于近场动力学的岩石水力压裂数值模拟及裂隙网络定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 612-622.
[7] 陈磊, 张广清, 张敏, 曹庾杰, 谌立吉, . 水力裂缝穿越非连续面扩展时的断裂过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 159-170.
[8] 周培尧, 潘丽燕, 陈华生, 王斌, 邹志坤, 张敏, . 薄互层水力裂缝垂向扩展控制因素试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 299-306.
[9] 吴飞鹏, 范贤章, 徐尔斯, 杨涛, 颜丙富, 刘静, . 压裂液高压渗滤对砂岩基质损伤演化的 细观力学分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3238-3248.
[10] 邵长跃, 潘鹏志, 赵德才, 姚天波, 苗书婷, 郁培阳, . 流量对水力压裂破裂压力和增压率的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2411-2421.
[11] 张钰彬, 黄丹. 页岩水力压裂过程的态型近场动力学模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2873-2881.
[12] 武晋文, 冯子军, 梁栋, 鲍先凯, . 单轴应力下带钻孔花岗岩注入高温蒸汽 破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2637-2644.
[13] 张 帆, 马 耕, 冯 丹, . 大尺寸真三轴煤岩水力压裂模拟试验 与裂缝扩展分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1890-1897.
[14] 徐辰宇, 白 冰, 刘明泽, . 注CO2条件下花岗岩破裂特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1474-1482.
[15] 李 栋, 卢义玉, 荣 耀, 周东平, 郭臣业, 张尚斌, 张承客, . 基于定向水力压裂增透的大断面瓦斯 隧道快速揭煤技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 363-369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!