岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1323-1334.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0754CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0754

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土地区在产企业污染监测及预警方法研究:基于时移高密度电法的应用

冯世进1, 2,陈佳卓1,高梦雯1, 3, 4,张晓磊1,吴强3, 4,肖钰3, 4   

  1. 1.同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2.同济大学 岩土与地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海200092; 3.宝武集团环境资源科技有限公司,上海,201999;4. 宝发环科技术有限公司,上海,201999
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-17 接受日期:2024-09-20 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-15
  • 作者简介:冯世进,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境岩土工程、土动力学与工程振动、软土工程与深基础等方面的研究。 E-mail: fsjgly@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2020YFC1808105);国家自然科学基金(No. 42372335);中央高校基础研究基金。

Research on monitoring and early warning methods for industrial pollution in soft soil areas: application of time-lapse high-density electrical resistivity tomography

FENG Shi-jin1, 2, CHEN Jia-zhuo1, GAO Meng-wen1, 3, 4, ZHANG Xiao-lei1, WU Qiang3, 4, XIAO Yu3, 4   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Baowu Group Environmental Resources Technology Limited Company, Shanghai 201999, China; 4. Shanghai Baofa Environmental Science Technology Limited Company, Shanghai 201999, China
  • Received:2024-06-17 Accepted:2024-09-20 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFC1808105), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42372335) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

摘要: 电阻率层析成像法(electrical resistivity tomography,ERT)已逐步应用于环境岩土领域,但针对软土区域有机污染识别的适用性仍缺少系统论证和应用实例。通过对上海某化工企业进行高密度电法测试,并采用钻孔取样验证和污染特征相关性分析等方法,有效地识别了该企业的污染特征。结果显示:场地污染区域均呈现局部高阻(70 Ω·m以上)和局部包裹状的显著特征,通过钻孔开挖验证了高密度电法在软土区域判别非水相有机污染的有效性;对纵向数据进行分析计算,发现污染区域点位电阻率随深度呈现先降后增再降的趋势并具有较低的相关性;根据污染划分结果建立长期监测系统,提出了一种基于图像灰度相关性理论的连续ERT监测信息定量评价方法,并通过入渗试验全过程反演计算图像相关系数,可实现非水相有机污染物的快速预警,为企业的污染泄漏快速判定、监测预警提供理论和技术参考。

关键词: 高密度电阻率, 有机污染物, 反演图像, 相关性分析, 监测预警

Abstract: Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has been gradually applied in the environmental geotechnical field, but its applicability for identifying organic pollution in soft soil areas lacks systematic validation and application examples. Through high-density electrical resistivity testing conducted at a chemical industry site in Shanghai, coupled with verification through borehole sampling and analysis of pollution characteristics, the pollution features of the site were effectively identified. Results indicate that contaminated areas exhibit localized high resistivity (above 70 Ω·m) and significant zones of encapsulation. Validation through borehole excavation confirmed the efficacy of high-density electrical resistivity tomography in discerning non-aqueous phase organic pollutants in soft soil areas. Analysis of longitudinal data revealed that point resistivity in polluted areas exhibits a trend of initial decrease, followed by an increase and subsequent decrease with depth. Based on pollution delineation results, a long-term monitoring system was established, proposing a quantitative evaluation method for continuous ERT monitoring information based on image grayscale correlation theory. By calculating image correlation coefficients throughout infiltration tests, rapid early warning of non-aqueous phase organic pollutants can be achieved, providing theoretical and technical references for rapid determination, monitoring, and early warning of pollution leaks in enterprises.

Key words: high-density electrical resistivity, organic pollutants, inversion imaging, correlation analysis, monitoring and early warning

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 江文豪, 冯晨, 黄啸, 李江山, . 缓冲层−复合隔离墙−含水层系统中有机污染物二维运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 731-741.
[2] 殷山, 宋大钊, 王恩元, 何学秋, 李忠辉, 刘晓斐, 刘玉冰, . 受载砂岩变形破坏过程磁场响应规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1803-1812.
[3] 赵迎宵, 何伟鹏, 丁晓英, 詹俊, 胡夏嵩, 刘昌义, 缪晓星, 王延秀, 卢海静, 邢光延, 李华坦, 张培豪、. 西宁盆地黄土区草本植物边坡电阻率与土体物理力学性质关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 477-488.
[4] 李江山, 江文豪, 冯晨, . 非等温分布条件下三层复合衬垫中有机污染物一维瞬态运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2717-2731.
[5] 章君政, 唐朝生, 巩学鹏, 周启友, 程青, 吕超, 施斌. 基于高密度电阻率法的土体干缩裂隙动态发育过程精细监测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 392-402.
[6] 张正哲, 贾科敏, 许成顺, 潘汝江. 倾斜液化场地−桩基−结构体系在近场脉冲与非脉冲地震动下地震响应差异分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3629-3638.
[7] 郑紫荆, 朱云海, 王巧, 谢海建, 陈赟, . 有机污染物在含土工膜复合隔离墙 和含水层系统的运移半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 453-465.
[8] 李艳, 程禹翰, 翟越, 魏盛宇, 杨宇冰, 赵瑞峰, 梁文彪, . 高温后花岗岩微观结构演化特性与 动态力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3316-3326.
[9] 杨以荣,谢红强,肖明砾,刘建锋,何江达, . 卸荷条件下横观各向同性岩体扩容与能量特性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1589-1599.
[10] 刘清秉 ,吴云刚 ,项 伟 ,汪 稔,. K0及三轴应力状态下压实膨胀土膨胀模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2795-2802.
[11] 徐江伟 ,余 闯 ,蔡晓庆 ,杨 萌,. 复合衬层中变系数有机污染物迁移规律分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 109-114.
[12] 杜 岩 ,谢谟文 ,蒋宇静 ,李 博 ,高 阳,. 基于自振频率的监测预警指标确定方法[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2284-2290.
[13] 崔永圣 ,马 林 ,刘宏岳 ,黄佳坤,. 珊瑚岛礁工程地球物理方法初探[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 683-689.
[14] 秦向辉 ,谭成轩 ,孙进忠 ,陈群策 ,安美建 . 地应力与岩石弹性模量关系试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1689-1695.
[15] 牛富俊 ,林战举 ,鲁嘉濠 ,刘 华. 青藏铁路路桥过渡段沉降变形影响因素分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 372-377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!