岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1379-1391.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0917CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0917

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

伊犁黄土水分入渗特征及其对湿陷变形的影响

包卫星,田 磊,吴谦,黄志明,张智勇   

  1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-24 接受日期:2024-10-22 出版日期:2025-05-06 发布日期:2025-05-06
  • 作者简介:包卫星,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土路基工程研究。E-mail: baowx@chd.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 52308435);新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项项目(No. 2020A03003-7);新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金 (No. 2023D01A91);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No. 300102214917)。

Characteristics of water infiltration in Ili loess and its impact on collapse deformation

BAO Wei-xing, TIAN Lei, WU Qian, HUANG Zhi-ming, ZHANG Zhi-yong   

  1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • Received:2024-07-24 Accepted:2024-10-22 Online:2025-05-06 Published:2025-05-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52308435), the Science and Technology Major Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2020A03003-7), the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2023D01A91) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Chang’an University (300102214917).

摘要: 伊犁黄土在水分入渗作用下易产生明显的湿陷变形,诱发一系列工程灾害。为研究其水分入渗特征及湿陷变形机制,在伊犁湿陷性黄土区域开展了现场浸水试验,分析了浸水过程中含水率、水分扩散形态、入渗水量以及地表湿陷变形的变化规律,并通过数值模拟探究了不同饱和入渗范围下的地表湿陷变形特征。结果表明,试验区土体竖向平均扩散速率为0.38 m/d,径向平均扩散速率为0.17 m/d。随着试验时间的增加,水分扩散形态由椭圆形转变为圆台形,其湿润锋扩散角为41°,饱和锋扩散角为20°。定量分析了伊犁黄土竖径向水分扩散速率与入渗量随时间的变化规律,据此得到了水分入渗范围与单位面积累计入渗量之间的数学关系。确定了试验地区湿陷修正系数β0为0.74,大于规范推荐值0.50。地表湿陷变形与水分入渗过程相关联,分为4个阶段:浸水稳定段、剧烈湿陷段、缓慢湿陷段、固结沉降段。随着饱和锋扩散角的逐渐增加,地表湿陷变形值与沉降槽公式计算结果始终保持良好的一致性,且沉降槽宽度与地表湿陷影响范围的变化规律基本一致,二者均符合指数函数递增关系。

关键词: 伊犁黄土, 现场浸水试验, 数值计算, 湿陷变形, 入渗特征

Abstract: Ili loess is susceptible to substantial collapsible deformation due to water infiltration, leading to various engineering failures. To investigate the characteristics of water infiltration and the mechanisms of collapsible deformation, a field immersion test was conducted in the collapsible loess region of Ili. The changes in water content, water diffusion form, infiltration water volume, and surface collapsible deformation during immersion were analyzed. Numerical simulations explored surface collapsible deformation characteristics under varying saturation infiltration ranges. The results showed that the average vertical diffusion rate in the experimental area was 0.38 m/d, while the average radial diffusion rate was 0.17 m/d. Over time, the water diffusion pattern transitioned from elliptical to conical, with a wet front angle of 41° and a saturated front angle of 20°. The quantitative analysis of the vertical and radial water diffusion rates and infiltration water volume of Ili loess over time was conducted. A mathematical relationship between infiltration range and cumulative infiltration volume per unit area was derived. The correction coefficient β0 for collapsible in the experimental area was determined to be 0.74, exceeding the recommended value of 0.5 in the specifications. The surface collapsible deformation correlates with water infiltration and can be divided into four stages: stable immersion, severe collapse, slow collapse, and consolidation settlement. As the saturation front angle increases, the surface collapsible deformation value maintains good consistency with the calculation results of the subsidence trough formula. The variation in the width of the subsidence trough aligns with the influence range of surface collapsibility, both following an exponential increase.

Key words: Ili loess, field immersion test, numerical calculation, collapsible deformation, infiltration characteristics

中图分类号: TU 444
[1] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[2] 王泽驰, 邵帅, 邵生俊, 吴昊, 张彬, 张少英. 真三轴力-水路径下原状黄土增湿变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3451-3461.
[3] 赵阳, 卢正, 颜廷舟, 李剑, 唐楚轩, 邱煜, 姚海林, . 土工格室加筋路基振动压实行为及预应力效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[4] 周长冰, 闫俊豪, 李小双, . 花岗岩热破裂裂隙动态演化特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 694-704.
[5] 王力, 南芳芸, 王世梅, 陈勇, 李小伟, 范志宏, 陈玙珊, . 三峡库区降雨型滑坡入渗特征及变形机制——基于一维和二维模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1363-1374.
[6] 刘德仁, 安政山, 徐硕昌, 王旭, 张转军, 金芯, 张严, . 靖远地区大厚度黄土地基浸水湿陷过程及土中竖向应力特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 268-278.
[7] 牛丽思, 张爱军, 王毓国, 任文渊, 赵佳敏, 赵庆玉, . 高易溶盐非饱和伊犁原状黄土的临界状态特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2647-2658.
[8] 吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.
[9] 姚志华, 陈正汉, 方祥位, 黄雪峰, . 非饱和原状黄土弹塑性损伤流固耦 合模型及其初步应用 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 216-226.
[10] 姚志华,连 杰,陈正汉,朱元青,方祥位,. 考虑细观结构演化的非饱和Q3 原状黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1553-1563.
[11] 叶 飞,宋 京,唐勇三,林剑飞,贾 涛,. 软弱围岩隧道掌子面及超前核心土挤出位移特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 323-330.
[12] 安 鹏,张爱军,邢义川,倪万魁,张 博,. 伊犁深厚湿陷性黄土浸水入渗及沉降变形特征分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 557-564.
[13] 黄雪峰 ,杨校辉 ,殷 鹤 ,刘自龙 ,周俊鹏,. 湿陷性黄土场地湿陷下限深度与桩基中性点位置关系研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 296-302.
[14] 黄 斌 ,程展林 ,徐 晗,. 膨胀土膨胀模型及边坡工程应用研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3550-3555.
[15] 刘思思 ,赵明华 ,李 亮,. 基于锚杆抗拔试验的动态折线模型分析[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3389-3395.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!