岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3323-3332.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1140CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1140

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于脲酶基低pH生物处理液的花岗岩残积土有效矿化深度研究

赖汉江1,陈嘉乐1,崔明娟2,张智超3   

  1. 1.福州大学 紫金地质与矿业学院,福建 福州 350108;2.福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350108; 3.福建省地质工程勘察院 自然资源部丘陵山地地质灾害防治重点实验室(福建省地质灾害重点实验室),福建 福州 350002
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-24 接受日期:2026-02-25 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 崔明娟,女,1987年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事生物岩土理论与技术研发等方面的工作。E-mail: cuimj2022@163.com
  • 作者简介:赖汉江,男,1987年生,博士,教授,主要从事地基处理理论及应用等方面的研究工作。E-mail: laihj@fzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52578393,No. 42477160);福建省自然科学基金(No. 2026J010022,No. 2025J09019)

Effective biomineralization depth of granite residual soil treated with a urease-based low-pH biotreatment solution

LAI Han-jiang1, CHEN Jia-le1, CUI Ming-juan2, ZHANG Zhi-chao3   

  1. 1. Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Hilly Mountains of Ministry of Natural Resources of China (Key Laboratory of Geohazard of Fujian Province), Fujian Geological Engineering Survey Institute, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002
  • Received:2025-10-24 Accepted:2026-02-25 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52578393, 42477160) and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2026J010022, 2025J09019).

摘要: 花岗岩残积土富含亲水性矿物,水敏性强,遇水易软化崩解,是滑坡等地质灾害常见土体类型之一。脲酶基生物矿化技术是一种对环境友好的岩土体改良技术,可提高花岗岩残积土抗崩解性。然而,花岗岩残积土的孔隙尺寸小、渗透性低,采用常规生物处理液进行原位喷淋的有效矿化深度浅。为此,提出采用脲酶基低pH生物处理液对花岗岩残积土进行生物矿化处理,并基于碳酸钙含量测试、崩解试验及扫描电镜,探究其有效矿化深度并揭示其机制。研究结果表明:脲酶基低pH生物处理液可显著提高生物矿化花岗岩残积土的有效深度;采用pH=3.00的胶结液与豆酶液按体积比1:1所配制处理液的喷淋矿化效果最优,初始含水率为24%的花岗岩残积土经7次喷淋处理的有效矿化深度达40 mm。

关键词: 生物矿化, 花岗岩残积土, 脲酶基低pH生物处理液, 抗崩解性, 有效矿化深度

Abstract: Granite residual soil is rich in hydrophilic minerals and exhibits strong water sensitivity; it tends to soften and disintegrate upon wetting. It is a soil type commonly associated with geohazards such as landslides. Urease-based biomineralization is an environmentally friendly soil-improvement approach that enhances resistance to disintegration of granite residual soil. However, granite residual soil generally has small pore size and low permeability, and its effective biomineralization depth is shallow using conventional spraying biotreatment solution in-situ. This study proposes using a urease-based, low-pH biotreatment solution for the biomineralization of granite residual soil. The effective biomineralization depth was evaluated, and the underlying mechanisms were elucidated using calcium carbonate content measurements, disintegration tests, and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis. The test results show that the urease-based low-pH biotreatment solution can significantly improve the effective biomineralization depth of granite residual soil. The biotreatment solution prepared with pH = 3.00 cementation solution and soybean urease solution at a 1:1 volume ratio has the best biomineralization. For granite residual soil with an initial water content of 24%, the effective biomineralization depth reaches 40 mm.

Key words: biomineralization, granite residual soil, urease-based low pH biotreatment solution, anti-disintegration, effective biomineralization depth

中图分类号: TU 449
[1] 陈一鹏, 金亦飞, 刘飞禹, 杨阳. 花岗岩残积土双向循环直剪试验及离散元法模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 2189-2200.
[2] 林沛元, 刘彤, 杨翔云, 丁庆峰, 袁勋. 土钉-花岗岩残积土界面抗剪强度水弱化累积效应试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 229-244.
[3] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[4] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[5] 谢毅鑫, 郑文杰, 薛中飞, 王琳, . 微生物诱导碳酸盐沉淀修复铜污染黄土的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 443-450.
[6] 缪林昌, 王恒星, 孙潇昊, 吴林玉, 郭薪, 范广才. 生物矿化固沙长效性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3212-3220.
[7] 舒荣军, 孔令伟, 周振华, 简涛, 李甜果, . 卸荷-增孔压条件下花岗岩残积土的力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 473-482.
[8] 黎澄生, 孔令伟, 舒荣军, 刘智军, 张炳鑫, . 花岗岩残积土剪切带上的细观结构损伤规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3203-3212.
[9] 汤连生, 王昊, 孙银磊, 刘其鑫, . 干湿过程中花岗岩残积土抗拉强度变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1749-1760.
[10] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 张国涛, 庞小朝, 苏栋, 刘继强, . 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1061-1072.
[11] 原鹏博, 朱磊, 钟秀梅, 董兰凤, 谌文武, . 酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固遗址土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3385-3392.
[12] 刘越, 陈东霞, 王晖, 于佳静, . 干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1933-1943.
[13] 汪华斌, 周宇, 余刚, 周博, 张爱军, . 结构性花岗岩残积土三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 991-1002.
[14] 李驰, 史冠宇, 武慧敏, 王翠艳, 高瑜, . 基于脲酶诱导碳酸钙沉积的微生物矿化技术 在分散性土改良中应用的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 333-342.
[15] 王港, 张先伟, 刘新宇, 徐倚晴, 芦剑锋, . 厦门花岗岩残积土的压缩变形特性及其微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3291-3300.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!