岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 595-606.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0190CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0190

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

工业废渣-水泥流态固化盾构渣土性能与配合比研究

王子帅1,陈益人2,王东星1, 3,赵静2,任衍增2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 三川德青科技有限公司,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 南华大学 土木工程学院,湖南 衡阳 421001
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-24 接受日期:2025-06-19 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-05
  • 通讯作者: 王东星,男,1984年生,博士(后),教授,博士生导师,主要从事淤泥固化、软基处理等环境岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。 E-mail: dongxing-wang@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王子帅,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事固废与特殊土处置等环境岩土方面的工作。E-mail: wangzishuai2020@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金区域创新发展联合基金(No. U24A20183);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 52578428);湖北省自然科学基金计划杰出青年项目(No. 2024AFA051);湖南省自然科学基金青年A类项目(No. 2025JJ20049)。

Performance and mix proportion of industrial residue-cement fluid solidified shield muck

WANG Zi-shuai1, CHEN Yi-ren2, WANG Dong-xing1, 3, ZHAO Jing2, REN Yan-zeng2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Safecleen Technologies Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China
  • Received:2025-02-24 Accepted:2025-06-19 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Regional Innovation and Development Joint Funds of National Natural Science Foundation of China (U24A20183), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52578428), the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province (2024AFA051) and the Science Foundation for Young Scholar Class A of Hunan Province (2025JJ20049).

摘要: 为推动城市固体废弃物资源化利用进程,对工业废渣-水泥流态固化盾构渣土性能及配合比进行了研究。利用高炉矿渣、电石渣、磷石膏、稻壳灰、粉煤灰和硅灰等工业废渣与水泥联合处理盾构渣土制备流态固化土试样,探讨了水灰比、灰土比、工业废渣种类及替代率对试样流动度、收缩变形和强度的影响规律。结果表明:试样流动度由水灰比和灰土比决定,随着粉煤灰替代率增加,流动度逐渐增加,随着其他工业废渣替代率增加,流动度逐渐降低,降低幅度排序为硅灰>稻壳灰>磷石膏>矿渣>电石渣;试样收缩变形主要发生在3~28 d内,工业废渣替代水泥后显著降低了试样收缩率;试样强度取决于水灰比和灰土比,低水灰比增加试样后期强度,高灰土比提升试样早期强度,工业废渣中高炉矿渣与磷石膏促进后期强度发展。最后,基于净浆流变和强度发展理论提出了流态固化土配合比设计方法,可为后续施工提供参考。

关键词: 工业废渣, 流态固化, 盾构渣土, 收缩变形, 配合比

Abstract: The performance and mix ratio of industrial residue-cement fluid solidified shield muck were studied for promoting the utilization of urban solid wastes. The shield muck collected in Wuhan city were solidified by cement and industrial residues, including blast furnace slag, carbide slag, phosphogypsum, rice husk ash, fly ash and silica fume. The effects of water-cement ratio, cement-soil ratio, industrial residue type and replacement ratio on sample fluidity, shrinkage deformation and strength were discussed. Results indicate that sample fluidity is determined by the water-cement and cement-soil ratios. As the fly ash replacement ratio increases, sample fluidity continuously increases. With increasing replacement ratios of other industrial residues, sample fluidity gradually decreases. The order of reduction is silica fume > rice husk ash > phosphogypsum > slag > carbide slag. The shrinkage deformation mainly occurs within 3~28 d, and the shrinkage rate is significantly reduced when the industrial residue replaces the cement. Sample strength depends on the water-cement ratio and the cement-soil ratio. A low water-cement ratio enhances long-term sample strength, while a high cement-soil ratio boosts early strength. Blast furnace slag and phosphogypsum in the industrial residue promote long-term strength development. Finally, a design method of fluid solidified soil mix ratio based on the theory of slurry rheology and strength development is proposed, providing reference for subsequent construction.

Key words: industrial residue, fluid solidification, shield muck, shrinkage deformation, mixing proportion

中图分类号: X 799
[1] 沈君, 程寅, 金小平, 斯纪平, 杨天军, 于浩, 余昆, . 废渣基地聚物稳定粉黏土性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 147-156.
[2] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[3] 章定文,曹智国. 工业废渣加固土强度特性[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 54-59.
[4] 贾致荣 ,赵成泉 ,鞠泽青 ,杨若冲,. 用石灰粉煤灰稳定煤矸石的初步研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 909-912.
[5] 张艳美 ,张旭东 ,张鸿儒,. 土工合成纤维土补强机理试验研究及工程应用[J]. , 2005, 26(8): 1323-1326.
[6] 姜陈钊 ,刘汉龙 ,温学钧 ,高玉峰,. 现浇钢渣混凝土薄壁管桩强度特性试验研究[J]. , 2004, 25(8): 1293-1296.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!