岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1219-1228.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0308CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0308

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析

刘红帅1,丁泊文1,宋东松2,李羿1,王永志3   

  1. 1.河北大学 河北省基础设施防灾减灾与智能评估重点实验室, 河北 保定 071002; 2.石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043; 3.中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-27 接受日期:2025-07-01 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 宋东松,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事场地地震响应研究。E-mail: 18233295386@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘红帅,男,1975年生,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土工程教学和液化场地基础抗震研究。E-mail: liuhs1975@hbu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金(No.E2024201045);中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项(No.2019EEEVL0202)。

Analysis of boundary effects of flexible laminated shear box on dry sand site centrifuge tests

LIU Hong-shuai1, DING Bo-wen1, SONG Dong-song2, LI Yi1, WANG Yong-zhi3   

  1. 1. Hebei Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Disaster Mitigation and Intelligent Assessment, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei 071002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structure, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2025-03-27 Accepted:2025-07-01 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2024201045) and the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2019EEEVL0202).

摘要: 干砂场地地震响应试验是检验柔性叠层剪切箱边界效应的有效手段。为此,设计完成50g离心加速度的干砂场地的离心振动台模型试验,采用典型的近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作为振动台面输入,对比分析埋设在场地中心和边界区的不同深度的加速度传感器的真实记录,评价箱体的边界效应。模型试验结果表明:边界效应随土体埋深的增大而减小,随箱壁距离的增大而减小;脉冲地震动的边界效应更加显著。试验若仅考虑地震动幅值,长边和短边方向离箱壁的距离分别不小于3/20L(L为模型箱长度)和1/5W(W为模型箱宽度)的范围可认为不受边界效应的影响,为自由场范围;若同时考虑地震动频谱特性和相位延滞,则自由场范围则应进一步根据试验研究确定。所得结论为提升离心振动台模型试验精度提供重要的参考。

关键词: 柔性叠层剪切箱, 边界效应, 干砂自由场, 离心振动台模型试验

Abstract: Seismic response testing of dry sand sites serves as an effective method for evaluating boundary effects of flexible laminated shear boxes. For this purpose, a centrifuge shaking table model test on a dry sand site was designed and conducted under 50g centrifugal acceleration. Representative near-fault pulse-like and non-pulse ground motions were used as input at the shaking table platform. Acceleration records from sensors installed at various depths within both the central zone and boundary regions of the site were comparatively analyzed to assess the shear box’s boundary effects. The model test results demonstrate that boundary effects diminish with increasing soil burial depth and greater distance from the box walls; furthermore, boundary effects are more pronounced under the pulse-like ground motion. When only ground-motion amplitude is considered, the free-field zone lies at least 3/20 L from the short-side wall and at least 1/5 W from the long-side wall (L = box length, W = box width). When ground-motion spectral characteristics and phase lag are also considered, the extent of the free-field zone requires further determination through experiments. The derived conclusions can provide critical reference for enhancing the accuracy of centrifuge shaking table model tests.

Key words: flexible laminated shear box, boundary effect, dry sand free field, centrifuge shaking table model test

中图分类号: TU 435
[1] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[2] 郑森, 李伟华, 崔杰, 李亚东, . 刚度可调层状多向剪切模型箱的研制及性能测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 616-625.
[3] 翟张辉, 张亚国, 李同录, 肖书雄, . 考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 301-311.
[4] 王体强, 王永志, 张雪东, 汤兆光, 段雪锋, . 超重力振动台柔性叠层箱剪切效能评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 719-728.
[5] 李小军,王晓辉,李 亮,韩 杰,. 振动台试验三维层状剪切模型箱的设计及性能测试[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1524-1532.
[6] 刘东燕,郑志明,侯 龙. 边坡模型边界效应及材料孔隙率敏感性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 23-27.
[7] 汪明元 ,包承纲 ,丁金华 ,蔡剑韬 , . 试验条件对土工格栅与膨胀土界面拉拔性状的影响[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 442-448.
[8] 钱岳红 ,唐德高 ,宋志文 ,姜鹏飞 ,曲 霞,. 脉冲荷载作用下地下结构动力特性及钢板抗层裂性能数值模拟[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 778-782.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!