岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1443-1458.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0311CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0311

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

热损伤灰岩声发射特征及巴西劈裂破坏规律研究

张坤博1,黄彦华1, 2,印昊1,李明旭1,杨景3   

  1. 1.中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116;2.中国矿业大学 深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;3.安徽理工大学 煤炭无人化开采数智技术全国重点实验室,安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-28 接受日期:2025-06-12 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 黄彦华,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事深部岩石力学与工程方面的研究。E-mail: huangyh1219@163.com
  • 作者简介:张坤博,男,2001年生,硕士研究生,主要从事深部岩石力学与工程方面的研究。E-mail:TS23030234P31@cumt.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2022YFC2905700);浙江省岩石力学与地质灾害重点实验室开放基金(No.ZJRMG-2024-04)。

Acoustic emission characteristics and Brazilian splitting failure patterns of thermally damaged limestone

ZHANG Kun-bo1, HUANG Yan-hua1, 2, YIN Hao1, LI Ming-xu1, YANG Jing3   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Digital and Intelligent Technology for Unmanned Coal Mine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2025-03-28 Accepted:2025-06-12 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2905700) and the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards of Zhejiang Province (ZJRMG-2024-04).

摘要: 为探究不同冷却方式下的岩石强度特性及破裂机制,对高温后灰岩进行自然冷却和遇水冷却处理,开展高温后灰岩巴西劈裂和声发射试验,获得了不同冷却方式下的灰岩抗拉强度,采用K-Means算法分析了灰岩破坏过程张拉及剪切裂纹演化规律。利用PFC构建了灰岩数值模型,分析了温度和冷却方式对灰岩抗拉强度、裂纹演化过程、位移场和力链的影响规律。结果表明:(1)灰岩抗拉强度随着温度升高而降低,且遇水冷却下灰岩强度低于自然冷却条件,与未经高温处理的灰岩相比,200~600 ℃下自然冷却的灰岩抗拉强度降幅为21.8%、62.8%、77.3%,遇水冷却的抗拉强度降幅为54.5%、65.3%、79.2%;(2)随着温度升高,峰前声发射事件增多,灰岩内部损伤程度逐渐加剧,且张拉裂纹分布于整个加载过程,而剪切裂纹主要分布于峰值及峰后阶段;(3)随着温度升高,裂纹复杂程度增加,遇水冷却下主裂纹衍生出较多次生裂纹,震级事件频率上升,位移场分布不规则性增强,力链网络稳定性降低。

关键词: 灰岩, 遇水冷却, 声发射, 破裂模式, 颗粒流

Abstract: To explore rock strength characteristics and fracture mechanisms under different cooling methods, limestone subjected to high temperature was naturally cooled or water-cooled. Brazilian splitting tests and acoustic emission measurements were performed on the limestone samples after high-temperature treatment, tensile strength under different cooling methods was measured, and the tensile and shear crack evolution during failure was analyzed using a K-Means algorithm. A numerical model of limestone was constructed by using PFC, and the influence of temperature and cooling mode on the tensile strength, crack evolution, displacement field and force chain of limestone was analyzed. The results show that: (1) The tensile strength of limestone decreases with the increase of temperature, and the strength of limestone cooled by water is lower than that under natural cooling conditions. Compared with the limestone without high temperature treatment, the tensile strength of naturally cooled limestone at 200−600°C decreases by 21.8%, 62.8% and 77.3%, and the tensile strength of limestone cooled by water decreases by 54.5%, 65.3% and 79.2%. (2) As temperature increases, pre-peak acoustic emission events increase and internal damage accumulates; tensile cracks are observed throughout loading, while shear cracks occur mainly near the peak and post-peak stages. (3) With increasing temperature, crack complexity increases; under water cooling, the main crack arises from numerous cracks, event magnitudes become more frequent, the displacement field becomes more irregular, and the stability of force-chain networks decreases.

Key words: limestone, cooled by water, acoustic emission, fracture pattern, PFC

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 赵康, 黄奇正, 石一辰, 马超, 冯印成, 田向勤, 刘浪. 不同粉煤灰掺量尾砂胶结充填体声发射与破坏预警特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 88-100.
[2] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[3] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[4] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[5] 李满, 辛昊哲, 刘先珊, 张帆, 胡大伟, 杨福见, . 基于修正相场模型的岩体混合模式破裂数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2600-2612.
[6] 雷瑞德, 顾清恒, 胡超, 贺培, 周林森, . 裂隙砂岩声发射信号特征及破裂前兆识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2023-2038.
[7] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[8] 吕萌, 王亮清, 谢妮, 朱林锋, 安彩龙, 柯睿, 王旭晨, . 加锚异性结构面剪切特性及声发射响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2106-2120.
[9] 马春德, 康子豪, 阳文源, 谭观霜, 赵俊康, . 不同加载速率下花岗岩多期应力记忆方向独立性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1709-1718.
[10] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[11] 韩世迎, 王航龙, 彭俊, 朱君星, 王林飞, 潘堃, . 结构面影响深埋隧道硬质围岩岩爆特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[12] 彭潇, 周剑, 张路青, 杨志法, 周唐富, 林雅苗, 杨多兴, . 实时高温和自然冷却条件下石英岩热损伤特征对比模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1943-1956.
[13] 张艳博, 周浩, 梁鹏, 姚旭龙, 陶志刚, 来有邦, . 基于到时精确拾取与智能优化算法结合的岩石声发射定位方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[14] 王晓敏, 屈钧利, 师亚平. 基于自回归模型方差陡增效应的微震P波到时拾取[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1335-1342.
[15] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!