岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1952-1960.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0567CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0567

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑预压压力的理化复合法处理流泥的强度发展模型

白欣悦1,郑俊杰1,章荣军1, 2, 3,刘斯杰1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 水资源工程与调度全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉430072
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-30 接受日期:2025-08-22 出版日期:2026-06-11 发布日期:2026-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 郑俊杰,男,1967年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程与隧道工程方面的教学、科研与技术咨询工作。 E-mail: zhengjunjie@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:白欣悦,女,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: baixinyue@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52338007,No.52208367);湖北省重点研发计划项目(No.2022BAA068)

Strength development model for slurry-like mud treated by physicochemical combined method considering preloading stress

BAI Xin-yue1, ZHENG Jun-jie1, ZHANG Rong-jun1, 2, 3, LIU Si-jie1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2025-05-30 Accepted:2025-08-22 Online:2026-06-11 Published:2026-06-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52338007, 52208367) and the Key Research and Development Program in Hubei Province of China (2022BAA068).

摘要: 采用融合了絮凝−固化−真空预压的理化复合法处理流泥能够实现流泥的高效资源化利用,但既有研究对该方法处理流泥的强度发展模型的认知尚不充分。本研究开展了系统的无侧限抗压强度试验,旨在剖析养护龄期、预压压力、等效初始含水率、固化剂掺量对理化复合法改性流泥早中期强度特性的影响机制。试验结果表明:改性流泥强度随养护龄期呈现前期快速增长、后期增速逐渐趋缓的增长规律;随预压压力的增大,改性流泥强度近似呈线性增长;固化剂掺量增加能显著提高改性流泥强度;等效初始含水率的增加则会降低改性流泥强度。通过对试验数据的挖掘与拟合分析,本研究创新性地构建了一种双曲线形式的强度发展模型,该模型全面涵盖了养护龄期、预压压力、等效初始含水率、固化剂掺量等关键参数,可为工程实践提供理论基础。

关键词: 流泥, 理化复合法, 絮凝, 固化, 预压压力, 强度发展模型

Abstract: The integrated physicochemical approach, which combines flocculation, solidification, and vacuum preloading, presents an efficient strategy for the resource utilization of slurry-like mud. To address the limited understanding of the development of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) in treated slurry-like mud, this study systematically conducted unconfined compressive strength tests. The investigation primarily focused on examining the influence of curing age, preloading stress, equivalent initial water content, and binder dosage on the strength characteristics during the early to medium stages. The test results unveiled distinct relationships: UCS exhibits rapid growth during the initial curing stages, followed by a gradual deceleration in the growth rate. Elevated preloading stress induces a nearly linear increase in strength, whereas an increased binder dosage significantly enhances UCS. Conversely, a higher equivalent initial water content diminishes the strength. Based on a rigorous analysis and fitting of the experimental data, this research developed a novel hyperbolic strength development model. This model uniquely incorporates the effects of curing age, preloading stress, equivalent initial water content, and binder dosage as key governing parameters. The comprehensive model offers a valuable theoretical framework for predicting the strength behavior of modified fluid mud treated by this physicochemical composite method in practical engineering applications.

Key words: slurry-like mud, physicochemical combined method, flocculation, solidification, preloading stress, strength development model

中图分类号: TU449
[1] 王勇, 吴其金, 李琦, 雷美清, 汪明元. 预碳化时长对MgO固化压实土强度的影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1160-1170.
[2] 王子帅, 陈益人, 王东星, 赵静, 任衍增, . 工业废渣-水泥流态固化盾构渣土性能与配合比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 595-606.
[3] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[4] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[5] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[6] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[7] 谈云志, 吴仙桥, 吴军, 明华军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 磷石膏基团粒调控固化淤泥的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[8] 吴林玉, 缪林昌, 孙潇昊, . 聚丙烯酰胺对酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀固沙效果影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1573-1580.
[9] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[10] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[11] 蒋新彧, 征西遥, 吴俊, 杨爱武, 李博, . HNO3和H2SO4侵蚀作用下地质聚合物固化软土的抗酸性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 851-866.
[12] 赖汉江, 刘润明, 陈志波, 崔明娟, . 粒径效应对大豆粗脲酶固化砂土效果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 25-32.
[13] 李爽, 李江山, 张平, 刘磊, 杜月林, 朱磊, 高腾飞, 陈亿军, . 垃圾腐殖土固化回填可行性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 84-94.
[14] 张荣, 卢正, 刘杰, 赵阳, 冯一诺, . 矿渣+粉煤灰+聚丙烯酰胺固化硫酸盐渍土的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 123-132.
[15] 沈君, 程寅, 金小平, 斯纪平, 杨天军, 于浩, 余昆, . 废渣基地聚物稳定粉黏土性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 147-156.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!