岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 389-398.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0001

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析

苏永华,李诚诚   

  1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-02 修回日期:2019-05-29 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-08
  • 通讯作者: 李诚诚,男,1991年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的学习和研究。E-mail: Lcc_ah@163.com E-mail: yong_su1965@126.com
  • 作者简介:苏永华,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程可靠度等方面的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51578232,No. 51878266)。

Stability analysis of slope based on Green-Ampt model under heavy rainfall

SU Yong-hua, LI Cheng-cheng   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, Hunan 410082, China
  • Received:2019-01-02 Revised:2019-05-29 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-08
  • Contact: LI Cheng-cheng, male, born in 1991, Master degree candidate, majoring in geotechnical engineering. E-mail: Lcc_ah@163.com E-mail: yong_su1965@126.com
  • About author:SU Yong-hua, male, born in 1965, PhD, Professor, PhD supervisor,Research interests: reliability of geotechnical engineering. E-mail: yong_su1965@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578232, 51878266).

摘要: 降雨入渗分析方法直接影响降雨型滑坡的预测与防范。Green-Ampt(GA)模型物理意义明确、参数较少,在降雨型滑坡分析中逐渐得到了重视,但该方法忽略了湿润层非饱和层的存在以及饱和层渗流而影响计算精度。针对以上不足,基于GA模型,建立了适用于边坡并且能综合考虑湿润层土体含水率分布情况与饱和层内平行于坡面渗流作用的降雨入渗分析(LSGA)模型,并提出了该模型下边坡稳定性系数表达式。结果表明:对于不考虑分层的无限长边坡,LSGA模型可简化为GA模型,说明GA模型是LSGA模型的一个特例;与LSGA模型相比,GA模型在失稳深度和时间上有较大延缓;饱和层渗流作用对湿润层特性影响较小,对边坡稳定性影响较大;相反,坡体长度方向尺寸效应则对湿润层特性影响明显,而对边坡稳定性影响较小;利用LSGA模型和稳定性评价方法得到的结果与模型试验揭示的现象基本吻合,证明了该方法有较好的精确性和可靠性。

关键词: 降雨入渗, Green-Ampt 模型, 分层假设, 渗流, 边坡稳定性

Abstract: The method of rainfall infiltration analysis directly affects the prediction and prevention of rainfall-induced landslides. Green-Ampt (GA) model, which has clear physical meaning and few parameters, has been paid more and more attention in the analysis of rainfall-induced landslides. However, this method ignores the existence of the unsaturated layer of the wetting layer and the seepage of the saturated layer, which affects the calculation accuracy. In view of the above deficiencies, the LSGA model is established based on the stratified hypothesis and the saturated layer seepage, and the expression of slope stability coefficient is established. All results show that LSGA model can be simplified to GA model for infinite slope without considering the stratified hypothesis of wetting layer, which indicates that GA model is a special case of LSGA model. The slope infiltration depth and instability time of GA are obviously behind the LSGA model. The saturated layer seepage has slight effect on the characteristics of the wetting layer, but has a great influence on the stability of slope. On the contrary, the effect of slope length on wetting layer characteristics is important, but the effect on slope stability is slight. All results obtained by using LSGA model and the stability evaluation method are basically consistent with the phenomena revealed by the model test, which proves that the method has better accuracy and reliability than others.

Key words: rainfall infiltration, Green-Ampt model, stratified hypothesis, seepage, slope stability

中图分类号: TU 431
[1] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[4] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[5] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[6] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[7] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[8] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[9] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
[10] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[11] 邓汉鑫, 武东生, 王晓光, 王东坡. 非均质孔隙介质中循环驱替对两相渗流及毛细捕获的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 505-514.
[12] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[13] 张仁君, 肖碧, 杨志兵, 郑小康, 胡冉, 陈益峰. 裂隙介质中毛细黏聚作用影响颗粒运移-堵塞机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3473-3484.
[14] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[15] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!