岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 379-388.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0016

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

热−水−力耦合条件下黏土岩蠕变特性研究

陈卫忠1,李翻翻1, 2,雷江1, 2,于洪丹1,马永尚1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-07 修回日期:2019-05-28 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-08
  • 作者简介:陈卫忠,男,1968年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事隧道及地下工程方面的教学及研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51979266,No. 51879258);比利时核废料地质处置研究中心合作项目(No. EUR-12-110)。

Study on creep characteristics of claystone under thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling

CHEN Wei-zhong1, LI Fan-fan1, 2, LEI Jiang1, 2, YU Hong-dan1, MA Yong-shang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-01-07 Revised:2019-05-28 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-08
  • About author:CHEN Wei-zhong, male, born in 1968, PhD, Professor, Doctoral supervisor, Research interest: tunnel and underground. E-mail: wzchen@whrsm.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979266, 51879258) and the Cooperation Project of the European Underground Research Infrastructure for Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Clay Environment, Mol, Belgium (EUR-12-110).

摘要: 黏土岩作为放射性核废料处置的备选介质,长期处于热-水-力耦合的复杂条件下。为研究围岩的长期稳定性,开展了一系列不同围压和偏应力下的黏土岩加温-降温排水蠕变试验。得出以下结论:温度的升高会提升黏土岩的蠕变速率,延长衰减蠕变阶段的时间,但是降温过程中试样主要以冷缩变形为主,并未见明显的蠕变变形;围压的降低以及偏应力的增加会提高黏土岩的蠕变速率,并且这种影响会随温度的升高明显加剧。基于试验结果,在Perzyna过应力理论的基础上引入蠕变硬化、蠕变损伤以及热损伤,建立了黏土岩热-水-力耦合蠕变模型。通过ABAQUS软件及其子程序对该模型进行数值实现,模拟结果与试验结果的对比初步表明该模型可以很好地描述热-水-力耦合条件下黏土岩的蠕变特性。

关键词: 黏土岩, 温度, 蠕变, 损伤, 过应力

Abstract: As an alternative medium for the underground disposal of radioactive waste, claystone will be in the complex conditions of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling for a long time. In order to study the long-term stability of surrounding rocks, a series of heating-cooling drainage creep tests on claystone was carried out under different confining pressures and deviatoric stresses, and the following conclusions were drawn. The rise of temperature will increase the creep rate of claystone, and extend the time of decay creep stage. But during the cooling process, the samples mainly experience shrinkage deformation without obvious creep deformation being observed. The decrease of confining pressure and the increase of deviatoric stress will increase the creep rate of claystone, and this effect will be significantly aggravated with the increase of temperature. Based on the experimental results, creep hardening, creep damage and thermal damage were introduced on the basis of Perzyna overstress theory, and a coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical creep model for claystone was established. The model was numerically implemented by ABAQUS and its subroutines. The comparison between the simulation results and test results demonstrates that the model can effectively describe the creep characteristics of claystone under thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling.

Key words: claystone, temperature, creep, damage, overstress

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[2] 张宪成, 池宝涛, 于先泽, 郭前建, 袁伟, 张耀明, . 面向近场有限元法的非结构网格划分及其断裂损伤分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 467-476.
[3] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[4] 张胜, 柏巍, 徐鼎平, 郑虹, 江权, 李志伟, 向天兵, . 循环荷载作用下砂岩损伤演化的声发射与电阻率监测及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 53-66.
[5] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[6] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[7] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[8] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[9] 王炳文, 刘臣毅, 康明超, 李乾龙, 杨雷, 周森林, 钱垒. 考虑应力的非闭合裂隙岩体损伤机制及裂纹扩展研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2409-2420.
[10] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[11] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[12] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[13] 雷舒羽, 曹净, 刘海明, 张兴文, 张柠锐. 工程碱性环境中泥炭土体结构性损伤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2135-2146.
[14] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[15] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!