岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 121-130.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0920CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0920

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征

王江锋1,吴涵兵1,赵顺利2, 3,杜春雪1,张淼4   

  1. 1. 华北水利水电大学 地球科学与工程学院,河南 郑州 450046;2. 江河安澜工程咨询有限公司,河南 郑州 450003; 3. 黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司,河南 郑州 450003;4. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-24 接受日期:2025-01-20 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-26
  • 作者简介:王江锋,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道与地下工程、岩土加固与测试等方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail: 398909366@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42107169);黄河勘测规划设计研究院有限公司自主研究开发项目(No.2022KY003)

Mechanical evolution characteristics of loading and unloading of red sandstone in a certain water conveyance tunnel considering compaction deformation

WANG Jiang-feng1, WU Han-bing1, ZHAO Shun-li2, 3, DU Chun-xue1, ZHANG Miao4   

  1. 1. College of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 2. Jianghe Anlan Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China; 3. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450003, China; 4. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • Received:2024-07-24 Accepted:2025-01-20 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42107169) and the Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd. Independent Research and Development Projects (2022KY003).

摘要: 针对不同幅值加卸载引起的围岩损伤破坏问题,选取某输水隧洞红砂岩开展不同应力幅值峰前、峰后加卸载试验,分析加卸载过程中应力−应变曲线、滞回环演化及宏观破坏特征。基于考虑压密变形的剪切损伤力学机制揭示了红砂岩四阶段力学演化特征,推导了加、卸载模量的理论计算公式,探究了其演化规律。结果表明:红砂岩峰前加卸载应力幅值越大,滞回环面积越大,相同应力幅值下,峰前滞回环面积相比峰后小;峰前滞回环随轴向应变呈疏−密−疏的发展趋势,峰后滞回环随轴向应变呈密−疏的发展趋势;红砂岩在加卸载条件下整体呈单斜面剪切破坏且在峰前、峰后全过程中均存在较大的不可逆变形;红砂岩的力学演化特征表现为孔隙裂隙压密、微裂纹稳定发展、裂纹非稳定发展、岩石破坏后4个阶段;考虑压密变形的剪切损伤力学机制能较好地描述红砂岩的强度变形特征;对加卸载模量的分析表明,峰前加载模量随着应力幅值的增大整体呈增加趋势,卸载模量趋于稳定值。研究成果对于隧道围岩损伤及稳定性分析具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 峰前、峰后加卸载, 压密变形, 加卸载模量, 剪切损伤, 力学特征

Abstract: In response to the damage and failure of surrounding rock caused by different amplitudes of loading and unloading, red sandstone from a certain water conveyance tunnel was selected for pre-peak and post-peak loading and unloading tests with different stress amplitudes, and the stress-strain curve, hysteresis loop evolution, and macroscopic failure characteristics during the loading and unloading process were analyzed. Based on the shear damage mechanics process that takes into account compaction deformation, the four-stage mechanical evolution characteristics of red sandstone were revealed, and the theoretical calculation formulas for loading and unloading moduli were derived to explore their evolution laws. The results show that the larger the amplitude of loading and unloading stress prior to the peak of red sandstone, the larger the hysteresis loop area. Under the same stress amplitude, the hysteresis loop area before the peak is less than that after the peak. The hysteresis loop before the peak shows a development trend of “sparse-dense-sparse” with axial strain, while the hysteresis loop after the peak shows a development trend of “dense-sparse”. Red sandstone exhibits overall single slope shear failure under loading and unloading conditions, with considerable irreversible deformation occurring throughout the process before and beyond the peak. The mechanical evolution characteristics of red sandstone are manifested in four stages: pore crack compaction, stable development of microcracks, unstable development of cracks, and rock failure. The strength and deformation characteristics of red sandstone may be better described using the shear damage mechanical mechanism that takes into account compaction deformation. The analysis of the loading and unloading moduli shows that the pre-peak loading modulus generally increases with the increase in stress amplitude, while the unloading modulus tends to stabilize. The research results have certain reference values for analyzing tunnel surrounding rock damage and stability.

Key words: pre-peak and post-peak loading and unloading, compaction deformation, loading and unloading moduli, shear damage, mechanical characteristics

中图分类号: TU452
[1] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[2] 王磊, 商瑞豪, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 张宇, 王安铖, 张帅, 刘化强, . 荷载作用下多裂隙煤体力学特性与起裂角研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 659-673.
[3] 许海亮, 谭安福, 宋义敏, 朱力, 安栋, 杜羽, 高晗钧, . 层状复合岩石变形破坏全过程接触面力学特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1683-1694.
[4] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[5] 赖金星 ,牛方园 ,樊浩博 ,邱军领 ,王开运,. 浅埋黄土隧道三层支护结构力学特性现场测试[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1769-1775.
[6] 查文华 ,宋新龙 ,武腾飞 ,李 雪 , . 温度对煤系泥岩力学特征影响的试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1334-1339.
[7] 林 杭,曹 平,李江腾,何忠明. 全长粘结式锚杆加固节理边坡的动静态位移响应[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1787-1792.
[8] 陈 松,徐光黎,陈国金,吴雪婷. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡滑带工程地质特征研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3048-3052.
[9] 贺可强 ,白建业 ,王思敬,. 降雨诱发型堆积层滑坡的位移动力学特征分析[J]. , 2005, 26(5): 705-709.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!