岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 485-491.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0410

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

部分排水条件下饱和黏土 渐近状态本构模型研究

刘家顺1, 2,王来贵3,张向东1,杨建军1,孙嘉宝1   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000; 2. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116; 3. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-25 修回日期:2019-05-08 出版日期:2020-02-11 发布日期:2020-02-08
  • 作者简介:刘家顺,男,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事土力学与地基基础方面的教学与研究
  • 基金资助:
    中国矿业大学深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室开放基金课题(No. SKLGDUEK1914);国家自然科学基金(No. 51774166);辽宁省自然科学基金指导项目(No. 20180551162)

An asymptotic state constitutive model for saturated clay under partial drainage

LIU Jia-shun1, 2, WANG Lai-gui3, ZHANG Xiang-dong1, YANG Jian-jun1, SUN Jia-bao1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering , Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. School of Mechanics & Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2019-02-25 Revised:2019-05-08 Online:2020-02-11 Published:2020-02-08
  • About author:LIU Jia-shun, male, born in 1986, PhD, Lecturer, mainly engaged in the teaching and research of soil mechanics and foundation. E-mail: liujiashun000@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Program of State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (SKLGDUEK1914), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774166) and the Natural Science Foundation Guidance Project of Liaoning Province(20180551162).

摘要: 为研究排水边界条件对饱和黏土强度特性的影响,利用GDS-DYNTTS动三轴仪开展了饱和黏土的不排水试验和自由排水试验。采用控制体应变与轴向应变增量比 的方法进行了部分排水条件下饱和黏土的强度特性试验,从孔隙水压力、p'-q平面的有效应力路径和渐近状态特性等方面研究了排水边界条件对饱和黏土力学特性的影响。基于渐近状态特性和剪胀特性,将应变增量比 引入应力路径本构模型,建立了饱和黏土渐近状态本构方程。通过与孔压、有效应力路径试验结果的对比验证了模型的合理性。试验结果表明:饱和黏土的应变增量比 应小于0.3;排水条件影响正常固结黏土剪胀性的发挥程度、有效应力路径以及土的抗剪强度大小。随着应变增量比 的增大,饱和黏土的孔隙水压和有效应力比减小而强度增大。试验后期,饱和黏土试样长期处于临界状态,改变排水条件可抑制或加速土体的破坏。

关键词: 土力学, 饱和黏土, 部分排水, 应变增量比, 强度

Abstract: A series of undrained, partially drained and completely drained triaxial tests were carried out to investigate the influence of drainage boundary conditions on the strength characteristics of saturated clay. The partially drained tests were carried out by controlling the strain increment ratio of the volume and axial strains. The tests investigated the influence of drainage boundary conditions on the mechanical properties of saturated clay including the pore water pressure, the effective stress path and the asymptotic behavior of the p-q plane. Based on the asymptotic state and dilatancy characteristics, an asymptotic state constitutive model for saturated clay was established by introducing the strain increment ratio into the stress path constitutive model. The comparison between experimental results of pore water pressure and effective stress path and simulations demonstrates a good predictive ability of the model. The test results show that the strain increment ratio of saturated clay should be less than 0.3. The drainage condition affects the dilatancy of normal consolidated clay, the effective stress path and the shear strength of soil. With the increase of the strain increment ratio, the pore water pressure and the effective stress ratio of saturated clay decrease but the strength increases. The saturated clay specimen will be in a critical state for a long time, and the change in drainage conditions can inhibit or accelerate the failure of the soil.

Key words: soil mechanics, saturated clay, partial drainage, strain increment ratio, strength

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[3] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[4] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[5] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[6] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[7] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[8] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[9] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[10] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[11] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[12] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[13] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[14] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[15] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!