软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0545

岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 1039-1047.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0545

软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究

雷升祥^{1, 2, 3}，赵伟^{1, 2}

1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院，四川成都 610031；2. 西南交通大学交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室，四川成都 610031； 3. 中国铁建股份有限公司，北京 100855

收稿日期:2019-03-20 修回日期:2019-07-29 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-26
通讯作者: 赵伟，男，1977年生，博士研究生，高级工程师，主要从事隧道与地下工程的研究工作。E-mail: swjtu_zhao@126.com E-mail:18192088688@163.com
作者简介:雷升祥，男，1965年生，博士，正高级工程师，博士生导师，主要从事隧道与地下工程的技术与管理工作
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划资助（No.2018YFC0808702，No.2018YFC0808706）；工程材料与结构加固福建省高校重点实验室开放基金（No.B170001-1）。

Study on mechanism of circumferential yielding support for soft rock tunnel with large deformation

LEI Sheng-xiang ^{1, 2, 3}, ZHAO Wei^{1, 2}

1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. China Railway Construction Corporation Limited, Beijing 100855, China

Received:2019-03-20 Revised:2019-07-29 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-26
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC0808702, 2018YFC0808706) and the Open Fund for Strengthening Engineering Materials and Structures in Key Laboratories of Universities in Fujian Province(B170001-1).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 传统锚喷支护不能满足软岩隧道变形控制的要求，让压支护成为控制变形的重要手段。环向让压支护是在隧道环向设置让压装置，实现支护结构刚?柔?刚的特性。从隧道开挖?支护过程中能量转化的角度，阐明了环向让压支护的原理，运用结构力学的解析法分析影响支护结构变形的主要因素，利用有限元软件ABAQUS比较分析传统支护与环向让压支护力学特点。得出如下结论：初期支护属于典型的压弯构件，环向让压支护通过环向压力使得让压装置屈曲，与支护结构的内力相一致，既能实现一定的支护阻力，又通过周长的缩短调整围岩应力和围岩压力；环向让压装置应设置在弯曲应力较小处，并确保其抗剪切的刚度和承载力，应具备“强剪弱压”的特点；环向让压支护具有刚?柔?刚的力学特性，可以实现与高地应力软岩的流变特性相适应。

关键词: 软岩隧道, 大变形, 环向让压支护

Abstract: It is difficult for traditional bolt-shotcrete support to meet the requirements of deformation control in soft rock tunnel, therefore yielding support becomes an important means to control deformation. The circumferential yielding support sets up the yielding device in the circumferential direction of the tunnel in order to realize the rigid-flexible-rigid characteristics of the supporting structure. From the perspective of energy transformation in tunnel excavation-support process, the principle of circumferential yielding support is clarified in this paper. The main factors affecting the deformation of the support structure are analyzed using the analytical method of structural mechanics, and the mechanical characteristics of traditional support and circumferential yielding support are compared using the finite element software ABAQUS. The following conclusions are drawn: the initial support is a typical compression-bending member. The circumferential yielding support causes the yielding device to buckle through the circumferential pressure, which balances with the internal force of the support structure. It is hence possible to achieve a certain support resistance while controlling the surrounding rock stress by shortening the circumference. The circumferential yielding device should be set at places where the bending stress is relatively small. The shear stiffness and bearing capacity of the device should be ensured with the characteristics of "strong shear and weak compression". The circumferential yielding support has the mechanical characteristics of rigid-flexible-rigid, which can be adapted to the rheological characteristics of soft rock with high geo-stress.

Key words: soft rock tunnel, large deformation, circumferential yielding support

中图分类号: U45

雷升祥, 赵伟. 软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.

LEI Sheng-xiang , ZHAO Wei. Study on mechanism of circumferential yielding support for soft rock tunnel with large deformation[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[2]	周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[3]	王学滨, 陈双印, 郑一方, 廖裴彬, . 考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 613-624.
[4]	李培涛, 刘泉声, 朱元广, 高峰, 范利丹, . 煤矿深部巷道大变形分步联合控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 591-612.
[5]	娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[6]	张伟, 晏飞, 王兆丰, 李邵军, . 基于物质点和深度积分耦合模型的滑坡数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2515-2526.
[7]	马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[8]	陈丁, 黄文雄, 黄丹. 光滑粒子法中的摩擦接触算法及其在含界面土体变形问题中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 885-894.
[9]	阳军生, 杨喜锋, 方星桦, 谢亦朋, 刘伟龙, ILYAS Ahbanouch, . 倾斜薄层炭质板岩隧道围岩大变形特征及其卸荷破坏防控对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3728-3737.
[10]	赵明珠, 吴学震, 叶青, 王刚, 蒋宇静, 邓涛, . 缩管式恒阻大变形锚杆抗冲击特性及其治理岩爆潜力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3355-3365.
[11]	邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴. 隧道底板渐进破裂碎胀大变形:一种新的底鼓机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1512-1529.
[12]	王祖乐, 孔德琼, 杜越明, 朱斌, . 岩土工程连续极限分析方法拓展与验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3531-3540.
[13]	邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴, 潘玉丛, 伯音, . 水平层状软弱围岩破裂碎胀大变形机制有限元−离散元耦合数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 508-523.
[14]	康永水, 耿志, 刘泉声, 刘滨, 朱元广, . 我国软岩大变形灾害控制技术与方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2035-2059.
[15]	周亚东, 翟鑫东, 李顺群, 陈思源, . 碎石桩复合地基大变形非线性固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2777-2784.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究

Study on mechanism of circumferential yielding support for soft rock tunnel with large deformation

PDF (Chinese)

PDF (English)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0