岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 613-624.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0041

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用

王学滨1, 2,陈双印2,郑一方2,廖裴彬2   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学 计算力学研究所,辽宁 阜新 123000;2. 辽宁工程技术大学 力学与工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-08 接受日期:2024-09-19 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 作者简介:王学滨,男,1975年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程材料变形、破坏及稳定性等方面的研究工作。E-mail: wxbbb@263.net
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52474101)

Lagrangian-discrete element method considering creep shear cracking and its application

WANG Xue-bin1, 2, CHEN Shuang-yin2, ZHENG Yi-fang2, LIAO Pei-bin2   

  1. 1. Institute of Computational Mechanics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China; 2. College of Mechanics and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2024-01-08 Accepted:2024-09-19 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52474101).

摘要: 随着煤炭开采向深部转移,巷道冒顶、底臌和两帮移进等软岩大变形问题层出不穷,对煤矿安全生产带来了严峻的挑战。目前,兼具连续方法和非连续方法优势的连续-非连续方法正在快速发展,然而,基于连续-非连续方法的蠕变研究尚少见报道。为了模拟蠕变剪裂现象,以岩石发生蠕变破坏时的应变位于三轴压缩应力-应变曲线峰后区域内这一试验现象为基本依据,在自主开发的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合连续-非连续方法中,考虑了单元的黏弹性,发展了能模拟界面黏塑性的蠕变剪裂模型,并引入了蠕变剪裂判据。单轴压缩岩样的蠕变曲线计算结果与试验结果基本相符,蠕变剪裂开始稍后,岩样即进入加速蠕变阶段,这表明所提出的方法具有模拟加速蠕变的潜力。针对软岩巷道的计算表明,在深部围岩的推挤作用下,离散块体涌向巷道,导致巷道断面急剧缩小,在宏观上表现为大变形,巷道竖直方向收缩率可达58.8%。从单元的黏弹性和界面(虚拟裂纹面)的黏塑性两方面,丰富了软岩巷道大变形机制,即介质的黏弹性小变形、块体的大位移及之间的空隙以及界面的黏塑性变形共同作用。巷道围岩宏观上的大变形无须采用复杂大变形理论即可描述。

关键词: 软岩, 蠕变, 大变形, 巷道围岩, 连续-非连续方法, 黏弹性, 剪裂

Abstract: As mining depth increases, the large deformation of soft rock, such as roof fall, floor heave and two-side movement of the tunnel, poses a severe challenge to safe mining. Currently, continuous-discontinuous methods, combining advantages of both continuous and discontinuous methods, are rapidly developing. However, creep has not yet been introduced into these methods. Based on the experimental phenomenon that rock creep failure strain occurs in the post-peak region of the triaxial compression stress-strain curve, the viscoelasticity of the element is considered. A creep shear cracking model is developed to account for the viscoplasticity of the interface, and a criterion of creep shear cracking is introduced into the combined Lagrangian-discrete element method (a kind of continuous-discontinuous method) to simulate the creep shear cracking. The calculated creep curve under uniaxial compression aligns closely with experimental results. Once creep shear cracking begins, the specimen enters the accelerated creep stage. The proposed method has the potential to simulate accelerated creep. Results of the soft rock tunnel indicate that discrete blocks move into the tunnel due to the pushing of deep rock, sharply reducing tunnel size. Macroscopically, the tunnel exhibits a large deformation. The tunnel’s vertical shrinkage rate can reach 58.8%. The mechanisms of large deformation in the soft rock tunnel, attributed to the viscoelasticity of the element and the viscoplasticity of the interface (fictitious crack surface), result from a combination of small viscoelastic deformation of the medium, large block displacement, and viscoplastic deformation of the interface. It is unnecessary to describe the tunnel’s macroscopic large deformation using complex large deformation theories.

Key words: soft rock, creep, large deformation, surrounding rock of roadway, continuous-discontinuous method, viscoelasticity, shear cracking

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 周雨晴, 吕鑫龙, . 红层软岩崩解面释放率与崩解特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 285-296.
[3] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[4] 梁金平, 李小瑞, 荆浩勇, 侯公羽, 苏占东, 张明磊, . 厚壁圆筒围岩试件的屈服机制及卸荷变形破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2676-2686.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[7] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[8] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[9] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[10] 朱元广, 王璇尧, 刘滨, 刘学伟, 薛皓元, 耿志, . 层状岩石横观各向同性蠕变损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1095-1108.
[11] 胡惠华, 李军伟, 范文韬, 林滢, 贺建清, . 水岩作用下红层软岩损伤劣化特征及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 685-694.
[12] 周航, 汪义圣, 亓戈平, . 黏弹性土中异形桩横向动力响应半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 761-774.
[13] 乔龙全, 常聚才, 严良欢, 齐潮, 史文豹, . 类软岩真三轴劈裂注浆裂隙扩展特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 833-850.
[14] 李培涛, 刘泉声, 朱元广, 高峰, 范利丹, . 煤矿深部巷道大变形分步联合控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 591-612.
[15] 潘超钒, 张晨, 张星星, 蔡正银, 王旭东, . 盐渍化粉土的蠕变特征及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3383-3394.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!