岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 591-612.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0147

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤矿深部巷道大变形分步联合控制研究

李培涛1, 2,刘泉声2,朱元广3,高峰2,范利丹1   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454003;2. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-26 接受日期:2024-05-16 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘泉声,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: liuqs@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李培涛,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事深部软岩大变形控制研究方面的工作。E-mail: tm_lpt@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. U21A20153, No. 52208244)

Combined support method for large deformation of deep coal mine tunnel

LI Pei-tao1, 2, LIU Quan-sheng2, ZHU Yuan-guang3, GAO Feng2, FAN Li-dan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454003, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2024-01-26 Accepted:2024-05-16 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20153, 52208244).

摘要: 深部巷道大变形已成为深部煤炭安全高效开采的关键制约因素。为实现深部软弱围岩稳定性控制,提出了基于深部巷道大变形演化过程的分步联合支护方案及其理论分析模型。结果表明,深部软弱围岩呈破裂碎胀变形-损伤扩容变形-连续变形的分布特征。分步联合支护后,围岩极限承载力随锚杆和锚索等效支护力增大呈线性增大趋势,但随注浆修复系数呈指数增大趋势。锚杆和锚索支护设计时应以极限承载力所需的注浆修复系数等于1.0时的等效支护力临界条件为基准。深浅孔注浆支护时须同时考虑注浆修复系数和围岩破裂区半径。不同支护措施的协同支护参数可由破裂修复区围岩极限承载平衡条件确定。数值模拟和工程应用分析表明,分步联合支护可实现深部软弱围岩碎胀大变形控制,具有较高的工程推广应用价值。

关键词: 深部软弱围岩, 大变形, 分步联合支护, 承载平衡, 协同控制

Abstract: Large deformations in deep tunnels pose a significant challenge to safe and efficient mining. To control the stability of deep soft surrounding rock, a combined support method and its theoretical analysis model were proposed, based on the evolution of large deformation in deep tunnels. Results indicated that deep soft surrounding rock can be categorized into fracture deformation, damage and expansion deformation, and continuous deformation zones. Following the implementation of combined support measures, the ultimate bearing capacity increased linearly with the equivalent support forces of anchor rods and cables and exponentially with the grouting reinforcement coefficient. The parameters for pre-stressed bolts and cables should be determined based on bearing balance conditions when the grouting reinforcement coefficient is 1.0. Both the grouting reinforcement coefficient and the fracture zone radius of surrounding rock should be considered in the design of grouting support for deep and shallow holes. Collaborative support parameters for various support measures were determined by the ultimate bearing capacity balance conditions of the surrounding rock in the reinforced fracture zone. Numerical simulation and engineering application analysis demonstrated that the large deformation of deep soft surrounding rock can be controlled through the collaborative control of support structures. The combined support method can be widely applied in other tunnel engineering projects.

Key words: deep soft rock, larger deformation, combined support method, bearing capacity balance, collaborative control

中图分类号: TD 322
[1] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[2] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[3] 王学滨, 陈双印, 郑一方, 廖裴彬, . 考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 613-624.
[4] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[5] 张伟, 晏飞, 王兆丰, 李邵军, . 基于物质点和深度积分耦合模型的滑坡数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2515-2526.
[6] 马登辉, 韩迅, 蔡正银, 关云飞, . 静压桩的桩侧土压力分布规律数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1863-1872.
[7] 陈丁, 黄文雄, 黄丹. 光滑粒子法中的摩擦接触算法及其在含界面土体变形问题中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 885-894.
[8] 阳军生, 杨喜锋, 方星桦, 谢亦朋, 刘伟龙, ILYAS Ahbanouch, . 倾斜薄层炭质板岩隧道围岩大变形特征及其卸荷破坏防控对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3728-3737.
[9] 赵明珠, 吴学震, 叶青, 王刚, 蒋宇静, 邓涛, . 缩管式恒阻大变形锚杆抗冲击特性及其治理岩爆潜力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3355-3365.
[10] 邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴. 隧道底板渐进破裂碎胀大变形:一种新的底鼓机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1512-1529.
[11] 王祖乐, 孔德琼, 杜越明, 朱斌, . 岩土工程连续极限分析方法拓展与验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3531-3540.
[12] 邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴, 潘玉丛, 伯音, . 水平层状软弱围岩破裂碎胀大变形机制 有限元−离散元耦合数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 508-523.
[13] 康永水, 耿志, 刘泉声, 刘滨, 朱元广, . 我国软岩大变形灾害控制技术与方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2035-2059.
[14] 周亚东, 翟鑫东, 李顺群, 陈思源, . 碎石桩复合地基大变形非线性固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2777-2784.
[15] 王兴开, 夏才初, 朱哲明, 谢文兵, 宋磊博, 韩观胜, . 单级荷载下极软煤岩长期蠕变规律及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2078-2088.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!