岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 19-29.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1520

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

极弱胶结岩石物理力学特性及本构模型研究

孟庆彬1, 2,王杰1,韩立军1,孙稳1,乔卫国2,王刚2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116; 2. 山东科技大学 山东省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室,山东 青岛 266590
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2019-11-11 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-04
  • 作者简介:孟庆彬,男,1985年生,博士后,副研究员,主要从事岩体加固理论与应用技术的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51704280,No.51574223);中国博士后科学基金项目(No.2015M580493,No.2017T100420);山东省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室开放课题项目(No.CDPM2014KF03)。

Physical and mechanical properties and constitutive model of very weakly cemented rock

MENG Qing-bin1, 2, WANG Jie1, HAN Li-jun1, SUN Wen1, QIAO Wei-guo2, WANG Gang2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics add Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Depositional Mineralization & Sedimentary Minerals, Shangdong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China
  • Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2019-11-11 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51704280, 51574223), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M580493, 2017T100420), and the Opening Project Fund for Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Mitigation) (CDPM2014KF03).

摘要: 极弱胶结岩石成岩时间晚,胶结差,强度低,易风化,遇水泥化崩解,特殊的成岩环境和沉积过程形成其独特的物理与力学性质。X射线衍射试验表明,极弱胶结岩石的黏土矿物成分以高岭石为主,其含量高达54%~69%。微观结构为蜂窝状、孔隙多且连通性好,整体结构性较差,遇水易发生水化反应,造成其孔隙率增加与强度降低,在自然条件下极易风化,短时间暴露即开裂。使用MTS 815岩石力学试验系统进行极弱胶结岩石的单轴与三轴压缩试验,获得极弱胶结岩石全应力?应变曲线,揭示了极弱胶结岩石峰后应变软化与扩容变形特性。试验结果表明,岩样破坏前后具有明显的体积膨胀特性,随着围压的提高,峰后体积膨胀特性逐渐减弱。基于裂纹体积应变模型,分析了极弱胶结岩石扩容大变形破坏机制,揭示了岩体强度与扩容参数随等效塑性应变的演化规律,建立了峰前损伤扩容与峰后破裂扩容屈服准则,构建了极弱胶结岩石扩容大变形本构模型。

关键词: 极弱胶结岩石, 物理力学性质, 单轴与三轴试验, 本构模型, 屈服准则

Abstract: The very weakly cemented rock has the characteristics of late diagenesis time, poor cementation, low intensity, easy weathering and disintegration. The special diagenetic environment and deposition process lead to its unique physical and mechanical properties. The X-ray diffraction test shows that the clay mineral composition of very weakly cemented rock is mainly kaolinite with the contents as high as 54%-69%. The microstructure of very weakly cemented rocks is honeycomb, porous and well-connected, with a poor overall structure. Hydration is easy to occur when encountering water, which results in an increase in porosity and a decrease in strength. It is easily weathered and cracks after a short period of exposure. Uniaxial and triaxial compression test of very weakly cemented rock are tested with the rock mechanical system MTS 815 and the complete stress-strain curves are obtained, revealing the post-peak strain softening and expansion deformation characteristics. The experimental results show that the rock sample has obvious volume expansion characteristics before and after the failure. With the increase of the confining pressure, the post-peak volume expansion characteristics are gradually weakened. Based on the crack volumetric strain model, the large dilation deformation failure mechanism of the very weakly cemented rock is analyzed, and the evolution law of rock mass strength and dilatancy parameters with equivalent plastic strain is revealed. At the same time, the pre-peak damage dilatancy and post-peak fracture dilatancy yield criteria are established, and the dilatancy and large-deformation constitutive model of the very weakly cemented rock is constructed.

Key words: very weakly cemented rock, physical and mechanical properties, uniaxial and triaxial compression test, constitutive model, yield criterion

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 侯克鹏, 江帆, 张超, 龚晶汉, . 土石混合体−基岩接触面剪切的基覆面形态效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 271-284.
[2] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[3] 梁金平, 李小瑞, 荆浩勇, 侯公羽, 苏占东, 张明磊, . 厚壁圆筒围岩试件的屈服机制及卸荷变形破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2676-2686.
[4] 屈俊童, 时启壮, 郭颖杰, 张 翔, 刘 熠, 蒋德阳. 冻融循环作用下冰碛土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2859-2872.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 都海龙, 金爱兵, 秦文静, 商瑞豪, 王传江, 马赛, . 单轴压缩下水泥注浆煤岩力学性能及损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1521-1533.
[7] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[10] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[11] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[12] 王番, 郅彬, 刘恩龙, 王小婵, 邓博团, 李金华, 张辉, . 考虑局部胶结破损热力学行为的结构性黄土二元介质本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 97-109.
[13] 薛阳, 苗发盛, 吴益平, 温韬, 王艳昆, . 土体本构模型参数的不确定性评估研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2797-2807.
[14] 周攀, 李镜培, 李盼盼, 刘耕云, 张超哲, . 基于界面本构模型的砂土中单桩荷载−沉降响应预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1686-1698.
[15] 郅彬, 王尚杰. 干湿-冻融循环下黄土力学特性及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1092-1102.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!