岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (S1): 156-162.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1349

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验

郑方1,邵生俊1, 2,佘芳涛1,袁浩1   

  1. 1. 西安理工大学 岩土工程研究所,陕西 西安 710048;2. 西安理工大学 陕西省黄土力学与工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710048
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-02 修回日期:2019-12-17 出版日期:2020-06-19 发布日期:2020-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 邵生俊,男,1964 年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学与黄土力学方面的研究。E-mail: sjshao@xaut.edu.cn E-mail:zhfshirley@126.com
  • 作者简介:郑方,女,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事黄土力学与土动力学方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.11572245,No.41272320,No.51608442)。

True triaxial shear tests of remolded loess under different matrix suctions

ZHENG Fang1, SHAO Sheng-jun1, 2, SHE Fang-tao1, YUAN Hao1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710048, China; 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Loess Mechanics and Engineering, Xi’an University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710048, China
  • Received:2019-08-02 Revised:2019-12-17 Online:2020-06-19 Published:2020-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11572245, 41272320, 51608442).

摘要: 为研究重塑黄土在控制吸力真三轴条件下的剪切特性,利用非饱和土固结仪测试了重塑黄土的土?水特征曲线,得到基质吸力与含水率的对应关系。利用真三轴仪对重塑黄土进行了控制基质吸力为50、100、200 kPa的固结排水剪切试验。在剪切试验中同时控制净平均应力为300 kPa,中主应力参数b值分别为0、0.25、0.50、0.75、1.00,试验结果给出大主应变、中主应变和小主应变与偏应力的关系曲线,研究了基质吸力和b值对土体应力?应变响应的影响。结果表明,重塑黄土的抗剪强度随基质吸力的增大而增大,随中主应力参数的b值增大而降低;应力?应变曲线随b值增大逐渐从应变硬化型向理想弹塑型转化;给出的重塑黄土在π平面上的强度破坏线,其随着基质吸力的增大而向外扩展,基质吸力会影响其位置、大小及形状,且重塑黄土不同基质吸力的试验结果与Lade-Duncan破坏准则的预测结果更接近。

关键词: 土?水特征曲线, 重塑黄土, 真三轴仪, 基质吸力, 中主应力参数

Abstract: In order to investigate the shear characteristics of remolded loess under suction-controlled true triaxial condition, firstly, soil-water characteristic curve of remolded loess was tested by using the unsaturated soil oedometer, so the relationship between moisture content and matrix suction of remolded loess was obtained. Then, true triaxial shear tests under consolidated drained conditions of remolded unsaturated loess were carried out with matrix suction of 50, 100 and 200 kPa. In the true triaxial shear tests, the net mean stress was kept at 300 kPa and the intermediate principal stress parameters(b-values) were respectively 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00. The relationship curves of major principal strain, intermediate principal strain and minor principal strain versus deviatoric stress from true triaxial test results were given. The effects of matrix suction and intermediate principal stress parameter on the stress-strain response of remolded loess were studied. It could be concluded that the shear strength of remolded loess increased with the increase of matrix suction. And it could be summarized that the shear strength of remolded loess decreased with the increase of intermediate principal stress parameter(b-value). The stress-strain curves gradually transformed from strain-hardening type to ideal elastic-plastic type with the increase of intermediate principal stress parameter(b-value). The strength failure line of the remolded loess on π-plane was given. The failure line expanded outward with the increase of matrix suction. Matrix suction might affect the position, size and shape of the failure line. Besides, the test results of different matrix suction were more similar to those predicted by Lade-Duncan criterion.

Key words: soil-water characteristic curve, remolded loess, true-triaxial apparatus, matrix suction, intermediate principal stress parameter

中图分类号: TU 444
[1] 李林, 孙砖芹. 考虑基质吸力影响的非饱和路堤三维稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1014-1025.
[2] 罗晓倩, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 田升奎, . 不同饱和度下膨胀土原位孔内剪切试验及强度响应特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 153-163.
[3] 程光, 范文, 于宁宇, 姜程程, 陶宜权, . 土−石混合体土−水特性和微观结构的相关性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 365-374.
[4] 李品良, 许强, 刘佳良, 何攀, 纪续, 陈婉琳, 彭大雷, . 盐分影响重塑黄土渗透性的微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 504-512.
[5] 王泽驰, 邵帅, 魏军政, 邵生俊, 沈晓钧, 吴昊, . 考虑中主应力变化的原状黄土变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 854-860.
[6] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
[7] 陈勇, 苏剑, 曹玲, 王力, 王世梅, . 基于数据挖掘的土−水特征曲线演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 23-34.
[8] 潘振辉, 肖涛, 李萍, . 压实度与制样含水率对压实黄土微结 构及水力特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 357-366.
[9] 周兵红. 一种预测砂土土-水特征曲线的简化方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 222-228.
[10] 邓波, 杨明辉, 王东星, 樊军伟, . 刚性挡墙后非饱和土破坏模式及主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2371-2382.
[11] 王智超, 罗磊, 田英辉, 张春会, . 非饱和压实土率敏性及蠕变时效特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1816-1824.
[12] 王海曼, 倪万魁, 刘魁, . 延安压实黄土土−水特征曲线的快速预测方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1845-1853.
[13] 高游, 李泽, 孙德安, 于海浩, 陈波, . 考虑初始孔隙比影响的单/双峰土−水特征曲线 模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1441-1452.
[14] 许韬, 白冰, . 考虑循环温度驱动的土−水特征曲线滞后模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3393-3402.
[15] 刘金都, 冯晨, 李江山, 汪凯凯, . 砷、镉复合重金属污染土土−水特性及 微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2841-2851.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!