岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2261-2270.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1522

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究

张磊1, 2,海维深1, 2,甘浩1, 2,曹卫平1, 2,王铁行1, 2   

  1. 1. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 西安建筑科技大学 陕西省岩土与地下空间工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710055
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-03 修回日期:2019-12-31 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:张磊,男,1981年生,博士,讲师,主要从事土与结构物相互作用方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51508455);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(No. 2019JM-232)

Study on bearing behavior of flexible single pile subject to horizontal and uplift combined load

ZHANG Lei1, 2, HAI Wei-shen1, 2, GAN Hao1, 2, CAO Wei-ping1, 2, WANG Tie-hang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Space Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China
  • Received:2019-09-03 Revised:2019-12-31 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508455) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2019JM-232).

摘要: 为探讨柔性单桩在水平与上拔组合荷载下的承载特性,开展了两组共6根单桩室内模型加载试验。其结果表明:相比于纯水平受荷桩的极限承载力Hu1,预先施加不超过0.5Tu1(纯上拔桩的极限承载力)的上拔荷载能够提高单桩的水平极限承载力,且随上拔荷载增加,水平极限承载力先增大后减小;增大预先施加的上拔荷载降低了同一水平荷载下桩身的弯矩及土反力,也削弱了地基的水平刚度,综合影响下桩身的水平位移先减小后增大;预先施加不超过0.5Hu1的水平荷载主要增大0~10D(D为外径)范围内桩身的平均摩阻力从而提高上拔极限承载力值,且水平荷载越大,其提高效果越显著;当水平荷载达到0.5Hu1时,对应的上拔极限承载力相比Tu1增加了17.1%,设计中可对增加的上拔极限承载力给予考虑。进一步通过理论研究验证了试验结果的合理性,给出了组合荷载下柔性桩的上拔极限承载力计算公式,其计算误差在6%范围内。

关键词: 桩基础, 承载特性, 模型试验, 组合荷载, 桩?土相互作用, 黄土地基

Abstract: In order to study the bearing behavior of a flexible single pile under combined horizontal and uplift loading, two groups of structural testing, comprised of 6 pile models in total have been carried out. The results show that for a flexible single pile, pre-applied uplift load with a magnitude smaller than half of pure uplifting capacity(Tu1) lead to significant improvement of ultimate horizontal bearing capacity, achieving greater horizontal resistance compared to pure ultimate horizontal bearing capacity (Hu1) Additionally, it has been observed that this horizontal bearing capacity increases initially but decreases subsequently under further increasing uplift load. This load increasing results in reduction of bending moment and soil resistance whilst degrades horizontal stiffness, and consequently, the horizontal displacement of pile increases initially but decreases subsequently under resultant effect. The ultimate uplift bearing capacity of a flexible single pile could be improved under pre-applied horizontal loads not exceeding 0.5Hu1, mainly attributed by increasing the average side friction of pile within the distance of 10 times the diameter of pile below the ground surface. This capacity is strengthened under larger horizontal load, and when this load reaches 0.5Hu1, the magnitude is increased by 17.1% compared with Tu1. This behavior could be taken into account with respect to pile design. The precision of test results has been verified by theoretical analysis, and a formula for calculating the ultimate uplift bearing capacity of flexible single pile under combined loads has been proposed. The corresponding analysis results have achieved good agreements with testing data and the error is less than 6%.

Key words: pile foundations, bearing behavior, model tests, combined loading, soil-pile interaction, loess subgrade

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!