岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1153-1162.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0806CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0806

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性

任一青,陈保国,任国卿,杨振忠,徐方   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉,430074
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-27 接受日期:2024-10-20 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 陈保国,男,1981 年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体与结构物相互作用方面的科研工作。E-mail: baoguo_chen@126.com
  • 作者简介:任一青,女,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事填埋式结构物受力特性研究。E-mail: ren-yiqing@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52178370)

Stress characteristics of high-fill box culvert with soft layers placed on the top and sidewall during construction

REN Yi-qing, CHEN Bao-guo, REN Guo-qing, YANG Zhen-zhong, XU Fang   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2024-06-27 Accepted:2024-10-20 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178370).

摘要: 高填方箱涵顶部铺设柔性填料能够大幅降低涵顶土压力,但同时也导致涵侧水平土压力和摩擦力显著增大,这很可能引起新的结构病害。为了进一步改善高填方箱涵受力状态,通过模型试验研究涵顶-涵侧同时铺设柔性填料后箱涵受力特性和减载效果。采用模型试验探究了海绵和可发性聚苯乙烯板(expanded polystyrene board,EPS板)两种柔性减载时,涵顶、涵侧和基底土压力随填土高度的变化规律;并将土压力结果无量纲化处理后得到土压力系数,与既有柔性填料减载技术代表性研究成果进行对比分析,探讨涵顶、涵侧铺设柔性填料的减载效果。结果表明,在涵洞顶部和侧部同时铺设柔性填料能够有效改善箱涵的受力状态,涵顶和涵侧产生土拱效应,通过土拱将涵洞上部土压力转移到涵侧外部填土中,既明显缓解了涵顶土压力集中,又有效降低了涵侧水平土压力和基底压力。

关键词: 箱型涵洞, 减载, 模型试验, 土压力, 土拱效应

Abstract: Laying soft materials on the top of high-fill box culverts can greatly reduce the vertical earth pressure on the top of the culvert. However, it also leads to a significant increase in horizontal earth pressure and friction on the sidewall of the box culvert, which is likely to cause new structural diseases. In order to improve the stress state of high-fill box culvert, this paper studied the stress characteristics and load reduction effect of box culvert with laying soft materials on the top slab and sidewalls of the culvert through model test. The variation laws of earth pressure on the culvert top, sidewall, and the foundation contact pressure with the fill height were explored by considering two different soft materials (i.e., Sponge and expanded polystyrene (EPS) board). Moreover, the earth pressure coefficients were obtained by the dimensionless of the earth pressure data, which were compared with the existing representative research results of the culverts with laying soft materials on the culvert structures, and the load reduction effect of laying soft materials both on the top slab and sidewalls was proved. The research results show that laying soft materials on the top slab and sidewalls of the culvert can effectively improve the stress state of the box culvert. The soil arch effects generate on the culvert top and sidewalls, the vertical load on the culvert top is transferred to the outside fill of the culvert. Thus, it not only significantly alleviates the earth pressure concentration on the culvert top slab, but also effectively reduces the horizontal earth pressure on the sidewall and the foundation contact pressure.

Key words: box culvert, load reduction, model test, earth pressure, soil arch effect

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[5] 卞海丁, 魏进, 王锦涛. 超大跨径管拱形钢波纹管涵洞的受力特性与土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2532-2546.
[6] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[8] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[9] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[10] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[11] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[12] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[13] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[14] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[15] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!