岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1163-1173.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0849CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0849

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究

周文强1, 2,蒋良潍1, 2,罗强1, 2 ,肖卓琦1, 2,罗義錬1, 2,魏明3   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031; 3. 华东交通大学 交通运输工程学院, 江西 南昌 330013
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-08 接受日期:2024-08-23 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 蒋良潍,男,1974年生,博士,副教授,主要从事道路岩土工程、地震工程方面的研究。E-mail: jiangliangwei@swjtu.cn
  • 作者简介:周文强,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事路基与土工技术方面的研究。E-mail: fanzhou1001@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52078435);2024年度江西省职业早期青年科技人才培养专项(No. 20244BCE52132)。

Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads

ZHOU Wen-qiang1, 2, JIANG Liang-wei1, 2, LUO Qiang1, 2, XIAO Zhuo-qi1, 2, LUO Yi-lian1, 2, WEI Ming3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031 China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of High-Speed Railway Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031 China; 3. School of Transportation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China
  • Received:2024-07-08 Accepted:2024-08-23 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078435) and the 2024 Jiangxi Provincial Special Program for the Cultivation of Early-Career Young Scientific and Technological Talents (20244BCE52132).

摘要: 锚杆框架梁在高烈度地震作用下存在节点处锚杆断裂、拔出而整体失效的破坏风险。基于在框架梁节点外锚头设置缓冲弹簧的柔性减震理念,设计并开展几何比尺为12的浅覆盖层-基岩边坡振动台模型试验。输入高烈度地震的人工合成波和汶川地震波,对比研究设置柔性外锚头对模型坡体振动加速度、锚杆轴力等地震响应特征的影响,分析锚杆轴力减载比随缓冲弹簧刚度的变化规律,探究柔性外锚头对锚杆地震能量响应及振动累积损伤的抑制效果。研究结果显示:设置柔性外锚头后,坡体加速度Arias强度沿高程的放大系数有所减小;随缓冲弹簧刚度减小,锚杆动轴力减载效果显现,减载比为72%~89%,且锚杆震后预应力变化幅度降低;锚杆动轴力的频谱分析和锚固界面线性累积损伤计算表明,易引起结构损伤的中高频段能量响应显著减弱,锚杆体受拉疲劳累积损伤及锚杆-砂浆锚固界面剪切累积损伤程度均明显减小,采用柔性外锚头可有效控制高烈度地震过程中的结构损伤。

关键词: 锚杆框架梁, 柔性外锚结构, 振动台试验, 时频特性, 线性累积损伤

Abstract: Anchoring frame beams are at risk of anchor bolt fracturing or pulling out at joints, which can lead to overall failure under high-intensity seismic action. Based on the concept of flexible damping, buffer springs were installed at the external anchor heads of frame beam joints, and a shaking table model test was conducted on a shallow overburden-rock slope with a geometric scale of 12. The seismic responses, including slope acceleration and anchor bolt axial force, were compared with and without the flexible external anchor heads under high-intensity seismic ground motions (artificial seismic waves and Wenchuan earthquake wave). Specifically, the variation in the anchor bolt force reduction ratio with different buffer spring stiffnesses was analyzed, and the benefits of spring anchor heads on seismic energy response and vibration-induced cumulative damage in anchor bolts were explored. The research results indicated that installing flexible external anchor heads led to a reduction in the amplification factor of Arias intensity. As the stiffness of the buffer spring decreased, the reduction ratio of the anchor bolt dynamic axial force ranged from 72% to 89%, and post-earthquake prestress loss of the anchor bolts was effectively reduced. Spectral analysis of anchor rod dynamic axial forces and linear cumulative damage calculations at the anchoring interface demonstrated that the energy response in the mid-to-high-frequency range was significantly attenuated, which could lead to structural damage. Both the cumulative tensile fatigue damage of the anchor bolt and the cumulative shear fatigue damage at the grout-anchor interface were both significantly reduced. The adoption of flexible external anchor heads effectively controlled structural damage during high-intensity seismic events.

Key words: anchoring frame beam, flexible external anchor structure, shaking table test, time-frequency characteristics, linear cumulative damage

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[2] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[3] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[4] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[5] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[6] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[7] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[8] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[9] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[10] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[11] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[12] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[13] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[14] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[15] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!