岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3033-3044.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1464CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1464

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究

蔡晓光1,徐洪路1,王海云2,李思汉3,李莹4   

  1. 1.中国地震灾害防御中心,北京 100029;2.中国地震局工程力学研究所 地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 3.防灾科技学院 地质工程学院,河北 三河 065201;4.滁州城市职业学院 管理与信息学院,安徽 滁州 239000
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-27 接受日期:2025-01-03 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 徐洪路,男,1996年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事加筋土挡墙抗震性能方面的研究。E-mail: xuhonglu@163.com
  • 作者简介:蔡晓光,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程抗震方面的研究。E-mail: caixiaoguang123@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金联合基金(No.U2139207);国家自然科学基金(No.51778144)。

Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall

CAI Xiao-guang1, XU Hong-lu1, WANG Hai-yun2, LI Si-han3, LI Ying4   

  1. 1. China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center, Beijing 100029, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 3. College of Geological Engineering, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Sanhe, Hebei 065201, China; 4. College of Management and Information, Chuzhou City Vocational College, Chuzhou, Anhui 239000, China
  • Received:2024-11-27 Accepted:2025-01-03 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2139207) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778144).

摘要: 现有加筋土挡墙抗震设计规范中的水平地震系数主要基于单组模型试验或数值模拟结果,且未考虑面板型式对加速度放大系数分布的影响。使用相同筋土材料开展了3组不同面板型式加筋土挡墙振动台模型试验,研究了加速度响应时频域分布特征以及面板型式对加速度放大系数的影响。试验结果表明:铺设加筋材料可有效提高土体刚度和整体性,从而增强加筋土挡墙对地震波低频和高频成分的放大作用;加速度放大系数沿墙高逐渐增大,且面板型式显著影响加速度放大系数的分布规律;返包式挡墙由于面板刚度较小,其加速度放大系数随着峰值加速度的增大而减小,最大加速度放大系数为1.69;而模块式和整体式挡墙的面板刚度较大,随着峰值加速度的增大,加速度放大系数逐渐增大,最大加速度放大系数分别为1.84和1.37。最后,提出了基于多组试验结果的不同面板型式加筋土挡墙拟静力法水平地震系数计算方法。该研究成果可为加筋土挡墙的地震稳定性分析提供参考。

关键词: 加筋土挡墙, 不同面板型式, 振动台试验, 水平地震系数, 抗震设计

Abstract: Current seismic design specifications for reinforced soil retaining walls primarily derive horizontal seismic coefficients from a limited set of model tests or numerical simulations, without considering the influence of facing type on acceleration amplification coefficient distribution. To address this gap, three sets of shaking table tests were conducted on reinforced soil retaining walls with different facing types, using identical soil and geosynthetic materials. The aim was to investigate the frequency-domain distribution of acceleration responses and the effect of facing type on the acceleration amplification coefficient. The test results show that the reinforcement materials significantly improves soil stiffness and integrity, enhancing the amplification of seismic wave components at both low and high frequencies. The acceleration amplification coefficient increases with height along the wall, and the facing type significantly influences its distribution. Specifically, for wrapped retaining wall with low facing stiffness, the acceleration amplification coefficient decreases as peak acceleration increases, reaching a maximum value of 1.69. In contrast, for modular and integral retaining walls with higher facing stiffness, the acceleration amplification coefficient increases with peak acceleration, reaching the maximum values of 1.84 and 1.37, respectively. Based on these findings, this paper proposes a method for calculating the horizontal seismic coefficients of reinforced soil retaining walls with different facing types using the quasi-static method. The results provide valuable insights for seismic stability analysis of reinforced soil retaining walls.

Key words: reinforced soil retaining wall, different facing types, shaking table test, horizontal seismic coefficient, seismic design

中图分类号: TU 476.4
[1] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[5] 朱斌, 齐吉琳, 李江, 杨玉生, 张屹蕃, 赵博超, . 基于震害调查的土石坝震陷规律和关键影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 619-630.
[6] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[7] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[8] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[9] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[11] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[12] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[13] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[14] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[15] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!