岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3045-3053.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1182CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1182

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答

张振光1,徐杰1,李海祥2   

  1. 1.上海公路桥梁(集团)有限公司,上海 200433;2.长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-24 接受日期:2024-11-05 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-10
  • 作者简介:张振光,男,1981年生,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事地下工程施工与岩土工程等研究。E-mail: zhangzg8505@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海市住房和城乡建设管理委员会科研项目(沪建科2021-002-013)

A slip line solution of active earth pressure against shafts in unsaturated soils considering the intermediate principal stress

ZHANG Zhen-guang1, XU Jie1, LI Hai-xiang2   

  1. 1. Shanghai Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200433, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Received:2024-09-24 Accepted:2024-11-05 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-rural Development (2021-002-013).

摘要: 合理确定主动土压力是实现空间轴对称竖井结构安全经济设计的前提。首先基于非饱和土双应力状态变量强度公式与空间轴对称统一强度理论,采用类比拓展法提出空间轴对称非饱和土的统一强度公式;继而联合滑移线简化法,推导考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答并在均布和线性吸力下具体化;最后对比文献结果进行验证,探讨非饱和特性、中间主应力效应的影响规律。研究表明:空间轴对称非饱和土统一强度公式可系列化呈现不同的中间主应力效应,具有重要的理论意义且表达简洁;竖井主动土压力滑移线解答同时考虑了中间主应力效应与非饱和特性,且与既有文献中饱和土竖井与非饱和土挡墙结果吻合良好,对均布、线性和非线性吸力均适用,工程应用前景广泛;竖井主动土压力随着基质吸力、中间主应力系数和统一强度理论参数的增加而显著减小,特别是在均布吸力下;慎重选取中间主应力系数以避免主动土压力偏离过大,不同中间主应力影响程度代表不同的非饱和土强度准则。

关键词: 圆形竖井, 主动土压力, 非饱和土, 滑移线法, 中间主应力

Abstract: Reasonable determination of active earth pressure is essential for safe and economical design of spatially axisymmetric shafts. Based on the strength equation involving two stress state variables for unsaturated soils and the spatially axisymmetric unified strength theory, a unified strength equation for spatially axisymmetric unsaturated soils was introduced through analogy extension method. Combined with the simplified slip line method, the slip line solution for active earth pressure on shafts in unsaturated soils was derived to capture the intermediate principal stress effect, specifically for uniform and linear suction distributions. Finally, it was validated through a comparative assessment with existing literature, discussing the influence of unsaturated characteristics and intermediate principal stress. The results reveal that the concise formulation of the unified strength equation for spatially axisymmetric unsaturated soils effectively addresses different intermediate principal stress effects, highlighting its theoretical importance. The slip line solution for active earth pressure on shafts simultaneously accounts for both intermediate principal stress effect and unsaturated characteristics, showing good agreement with results for shafts in saturated soils and retaining walls in unsaturated soils reported in the literature. Moreover, it is applicable to uniform, linear and nonlinear suction distributions, and it has broad engineering application prospects. The active earth pressure on the shaft decreases significantly as the matric suction, the intermediate principal stress coefficient, and the unified strength theory parameter increase, especially for uniform suction. Careful selection of the intermediate principal stress coefficient is crucial to prevent large deviations in active earth pressure. The different influencing extents of intermediate principal stress corresponds to different strength criteria for unsaturated soils.

Key words: circular shafts, active earth pressure, unsaturated soils, slip line method, intermediate principal stress

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 郑晨, 白强强, 黄克起, 刘晓敏, 张强, 何晓佩, 宋立伟, . 黏土中竖井开挖诱发地层三维变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 335-342.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[4] 张振光, 徐杰, 范家燊, . 不排水条件下非饱和土球孔扩张的塑性新解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1988-1996.
[5] 尚召伟, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 王斐, 黎澄生, . 非饱和花岗岩残积土的小应变剪切模量特性与其持水特征曲线确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1131-1140.
[6] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[7] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
[8] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[9] 柳鸿博, 戴国亮, 周凤玺, 龚志宇, 陈智伟, . 黏弹性非饱和土中劲性复合桩纵向动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1365-1377.
[10] 彭俊国, 黄宇豪. 非饱和边坡中锚托板锚固尺寸的新算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1003-1013.
[11] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[12] 陈可, 王琛, 梁发云, 汪中卫, . 考虑水力滞后与变形耦合的非饱和土持水曲线模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3694-3704.
[13] 邵帅, 邵生俊, 高梦洁, 刘小康, 王立新, 严广艺, . 水-力耦合非饱和黄土的弹塑性模型适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 436-442.
[14] 周凤玺, 姚桃岐, 柳鸿博, . 非饱和土中Rayleigh波传播的能量特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 612-622.
[15] 乔亚飞, 闫凯, 赵腾腾, 丁文其, . 软土地区超深圆形竖井的坑底隆起特性与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2707-2716.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!