岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 640-652.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0397

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究

姚嘉楠1,徐长节1, 2, 3,迟民良1,王艳萍4,习跃来4,王伟锋4,冯国辉1,孙佳政1   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 华东交通大学 江西省地下空间技术开发工程研究中心,江西 南昌 330013; 3. 华东交通大学 江西省岩土工程基础设施安全与控制重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013; 4. 浙江省建投交通基础建设集团有限公司,浙江 杭州 310012
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-03 接受日期:2024-08-19 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 作者简介:姚嘉楠,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事土压力理论与离散元模拟等方面的研究。E-mail: yaojn@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52238009);国家自然科学基金–高铁联合基金(No. U1934208);江西省自然科学基金–揭榜挂帅资助项目 (No. 20223BBG71018)

Discrete element simulation and theoretical study on non-limit active earth pressure of rigid retaining wall under RBT mode

YAO Jia-nan1, XU Chang-jie1, 2, 3, CHI Min-liang1, WANG Yan-ping4, XI Yue-lai4, WANG Wei-feng4, FENG Guo-hui1, SUN Jia-zheng 1   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Engineering Research & Development Centre for Underground Technology of Jiangxi Province, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 3. Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Infrastructure Safety Control in Geotechnical Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330013, China; 4. Zhejiang Infrastructure Construction Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
  • Received:2024-04-03 Accepted:2024-08-19 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52238009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China-High-Speed Rail Joint Fund (U1934208) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province – Unveiling the Leader Funding Project (20223BBG71018).

摘要: 针对刚性挡墙绕基底转动与平动耦合(rotation around the base and translation coupling,简称RBT)模式下砂土非极限主动土压力的分布问题,选取转动中心位置参数n=0.5、1.0、5.0共3组转动中心对其进行离散元模拟研究。结果表明,RBT模式下主动土压力兼具绕基底转动(rotation around base,简称RB)模式下凹型分布和平动(translational,简称T)模式直线分布的特点。在破坏过程中,墙土摩擦角往往先于内摩擦角达到极限值,墙后滑裂面为一曲面,且土体滑裂面处有明显的主应力偏转现象。基于数值模拟结果,根据中间对称圆弧拱得到了层间等效内摩擦角与n的函数关系式,利用水平层分析法,建立了曲边梯形微分单元的受力平衡方程,采用有限差分法求解得到了RBT模式非极限主动土压力数值解。参数分析表明,墙体位移、内摩擦角及转动中心位置参数n对主动土压力具有显著的影响。通过与数值模拟和模型试验的对比,验证了所提理论的合理性和可靠性,研究成果可为刚性挡土墙土压力计算提供参考。

关键词: RBT模式, 非极限主动土压力, 离散元法, 土拱效应, 层间等效内摩擦角, 水平层分析法

Abstract: This study investigates the distribution of non-limit active earth pressure in sand under the rotation around the base and translation coupling (RBT) mode of rigid retaining wall. Three groups of position parameter of rotation center (n=0.5, 1.0, and 5.0) are selected for discrete element simulation study. The results indicate that the active earth pressure in RBT mode exhibits both concave distribution characteristics of the rotation around base (RB) mode and linear distribution characteristics of the translational (T) mode in rigid retaining walls. During failure, the wall-soil friction angle usually reaches its limit value before the internal friction angle. The slip surface behind the wall forms a curve, with a noticeable principal stress deflection at the soil slip surface. Based on the numerical simulation results, the relationship between the equivalent internal friction angle of the interlayer and the position parameter of rotation center n is derived using the middle symmetrical arc arch. The force equilibrium equation for the curved trapezoidal differential unit is established using the horizontal layer analysis method, and the numerical solution for non-limit active earth pressure in RBT mode is obtained using the finite difference method. Parameter analysis shows that displacement, internal friction angle and n significantly affect the active earth pressure. Comparison of numerical simulations and model tests verifies the rationality and reliability of the theory presented in this paper. The findings provide a valuable reference for calculating earth pressure in rigid retaining walls.

Key words: RBT mode, non-ultimate active earth pressure, discrete element method, soil arching effect, equivalent internal friction angle of interlayer, horizontal layer analysis method

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[2] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[3] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[4] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[5] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[6] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[7] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[8] 金磊, 叶阳, 王宇, 李晶晶, . 抗转动对散粒介质三轴剪切力学行为的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3779-3790.
[9] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[10] 杜炜, 聂如松, 李列列, 谭永长, 张杰, 祁延录, . 考虑不同边界条件的风积沙−土工格栅拉拔试验离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[11] 杨阳, 田英辉, 张春会, 王荣, 王智超, 王乐, . 砂土海床中海底管道贯入阻力演化特征及细观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1001-1008.
[12] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[13] 王思远, 蒋明镜, 李承超, 张旭东, . 三轴剪切条件下胶结型深海能源土应变局部化离散元模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3307-3317.
[14] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[15] 杨磊, 涂冬媚, 朱启银, 吴则祥, 余闯, . 考虑变温幅值影响的颗粒循环热 固结离散元法试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 591-600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!