岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1228-1239.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0822CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0822

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析

王洪涛1, 2, 3,刘容利1,赵晓东3,赵耀辉4,赵万里1   

  1. 1.山东建筑大学 土木工程学院,山东 济南 250101;2.山东建筑大学 教育部建筑结构加固改造与地下空间工程重点实验室,山东 济南 250101; 3.济南轨道交通集团有限公司,山东 济南 250100;4.山东省物化探勘查院,山东 济南 250013
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-02 接受日期:2024-11-08 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-15
  • 作者简介:王洪涛,男,1986年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程灾变及稳定控制方面的研究。E-mail: wanghongtao918@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52374093);中国博士后科学基金(No.2022M711314);山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR2022ME088);济南市科研带头人工作室项目(No.202333054)。

Mechanical effect analysis of soil arch between piles under composite support of steel pipe piles and cast-in-place piles

WANG Hong-tao1, 2, 3, LIU Rong-li1, ZHAO Xiao-dong3, ZHAO Yao-hui4, ZHAO Wan-li1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, Shandong 250101, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Structural Retrofitting and Underground Space Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan, Shandong 250101, China; 3. Jinan Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250100, China; 4. Shandong Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, Jinan, Shandong 250013, China
  • Received:2024-07-02 Accepted:2024-11-08 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52374093), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M711314), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022ME088) and the Jinan Scientific Research Leader Studio Project (202333054).

摘要: 为研究不同类型围护桩联合作用下基坑地层土体支护力学响应特征,以济南轨道交通4号线林家庄车站基坑工程为依托,针对现场首次采用的钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护形式,构造提出了复合桩作用下地层支护应力解析分析模型与计算方法,分析了不同地层深度与桩间距下地层内部最大主应力分布特征及成拱效应规律。在此基础上,根据最大主应力支护迹线与桩间土拱轴线关系,提出了钢管桩与灌注桩间隔布设下桩间成拱分析模型,由内拱与外拱共同承担地层侧向土压力,推导了合理桩间距S和荷载分担系数λ 的理论公式,并讨论了钢管桩、灌注桩的承担荷载能力关系。最后,结合具体工程实例验证了土拱分析模型的有效性,分析了内摩擦角、黏聚力、桩径等不同参数对合理桩间距S和荷载分担系数λ 的影响规律。研究结果表明:钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下,合理桩间距S随着内摩擦角、黏聚力、桩径的增加而增大;荷载分担系数λ 随着内摩擦角及黏聚力的增加而增大,相应的外拱承担荷载的能力逐渐增强;当其他参数不变,钢管桩直径增大时,外拱承担荷载能力会逐渐减小。

关键词: 土拱效应, 大主应力, 桩间距, 荷载分担系数

Abstract: In order to study the mechanical response characteristics of soil support of foundation pit under the combined action of different types of retaining piles. Based on the foundation pit project of Linjiazhuang Station, Line 4 of Jinan Rail Transit, and aiming at the composite support form of steel pipe pile and cast-in-place pile adopted for the first time on site, the analytical analysis model and calculation method of stratum support stress under the action of composite piles are proposed. The distribution characteristics of the maximum principal stress and the rule of arching effect under different formation depths and pile spacings are analyzed. On this basis, according to the relationship between the maximum principal stress support line and the soil arch axis between piles, an arch analysis model is put forward, in which the inner arch and the outer arch bear the lateral earth pressure together, the theoretical formulas of reasonable pile spacing S and load sharing coefficient λ  are derived, and the load-bearing capacity relationship between steel pipe pile and cast-in pile is discussed. Finally, the effectiveness of the soil arch analysis model is verified with concrete engineering examples, and the influence of different parameters such as internal friction angle, cohesion force, and pile diameter on reasonable pile spacing S and load sharing coefficient λ  is analyzed. The results show that the reasonable pile spacing S increases with the increase of internal friction angle, cohesion force, and pile diameter under the composite support design. The load sharing coefficient λ  increases with the increase of internal friction angle and cohesion, and the load bearing capacity of the outer arch gradually increases. When other parameters remain unchanged and the diameter of steel pipe pile increases, the load bearing capacity of outer arch will gradually decrease.

Key words: soil arching effect, maximum principal stress, pile spacing, load sharing factor

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[2] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[3] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[4] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[5] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[6] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[7] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[8] 戴天毅, 肖世国, . 考虑路堤−加固区相互作用的刚性桩复合 地基沉降算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 479-489.
[9] 邓友生, 李令涛, 彭程谱, 李龙, 刘俊聪, 付云博. 静动荷载下桩网结构路基模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2149-2156.
[10] 黎春林. 盾构开挖面三维曲面体破坏模型 及支护力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2092-2102.
[11] 张恒志, 徐长节, 何寨兵, 黄展军, 何小辉, . 基于离散元方法的不同挡墙变位模式下有 限土体主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.
[12] 尹小卡, 杜思义, 王涛涛. 砂土液化与水泥粉煤灰碎石桩施工参数 关系的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2518-2524.
[13] 朱晟, 张远, 加力别克·阿哈力别克, 喻建清, 何兆升, . 基于增量分析的堆石坝瞬变-流变参数联合反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1453-1461.
[14] 崔蓬勃, 朱永全, 刘勇, 朱正国, 潘英东, . 非饱和砂土隧道土拱效应模型试验 及颗粒流数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.
[15] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!