岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1240-1251.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0761CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0761

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验

常洪林1,孔纲强1,王福慧1,王成龙2,周杨1   

  1. 1.河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210024;2.重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验,重庆 400045
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-18 接受日期:2024-08-01 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 孔纲强,男,1982年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事能源地下结构与工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: gqkong1@163.com
  • 作者简介:常洪林,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事能量桩等方面的研究工作。E-mail: changhonglin2019@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No. B240205006);国家自然科学基金(No. 52108313)

Field tests on thermo-mechanical response characteristics of prestressed high-strength concrete energy pile under the action of cushion layer

CHANG Hong-lin1, KONG Gang-qiang1, WANG Fu-hui1, WANG Cheng-long2, ZHOU Yang1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210024, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of the Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China
  • Received:2024-06-18 Accepted:2024-08-01 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B240205006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108313).

摘要: 能量桩是一种兼具承载与换热功能于一体的建筑节能新技术,然而,既有研究主要围绕能量桩桩顶处于自由无约束状态或者桩基−承台/筏板等刚性约束状态,对于柔性约束状态下能量桩的热力响应机制尚不清楚,尤其是能量桩桩基复合地基的作用机制知之甚少。依托河南平舆坝道工程医院超低能耗绿色建筑项目,开展褥垫层对预应力高强混凝土(prestressed high-strength concrete,PHC)能量桩热力响应特性影响的现场试验;实测温度和荷载联合作用下桩身温度及应变的发展规律,初步探讨了约束应力、热致侧摩阻力、轴向位移、桩−土应力比、邻桩响应特性等演化规律。研究结果表明:试验条件下,褥垫层影响下桩顶处(0.133L)的约束度约为65%;加热96 h后,距桩顶0.133L~0.333L处表现较小的负摩阻力,桩顶处(0.133L)产生的最大向上轴向位移约为桩径的0.14%;加热120 h后,距桩顶0.333L处的桩−土应力比增长了近3倍。

关键词: PHC管桩, 能量桩, 褥垫层, 柔性约束, 热力响应特性

Abstract: Energy piles are a new energy-saving technology for buildings that combines load-bearing performance and heat exchange performance. Most studies on energy piles are carried out under free and unconstrained conditions or rigid constraints, such as pile-cap/raft systems. However, the thermo-mechanical response characteristics of energy piles under the relatively flexible constraint state of a composite foundation remain unclear. Field tests were conducted at the BeSTDR Infrastructue Hospital in Pingyu County, Henan Province, as an ultra-low energy consumption green building project to assess how cushion layers affect the thermo-mechanical response characteristics of prestressed high-strength concrete (PHC) energy piles. The development patterns of temperature and strain along pile body were measured, and the changes in constraint stress, thermal-induced side friction resistance, axial displacement, pile-soil stress ratio, and the response characteristics of the adjacent pile were preliminarily explored. The results show that under the experimental conditions, the constraint capacity at the pile top (0.133L) is approximately 65% due to the influence of the cushion layer. After 96 hours of heating, the region between 0.133L and 0.333L from the pile top exhibited minimal negative skin friction, with the maximum upward axial displacement at the pile top (0.133L) reaching about 0.14% of the pile diameter. After 120 hours of heating, the pile-soil stress ratio at 0.133L from the pile top nearly tripled.

Key words: prestressed high-strength concrete (PHC) pipe pile, energy pile, cushion layer, flexible constraint, thermo-mechanical response characteristics

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 蒋济泽, 王成龙, 黄煜镔, 赵华, 陈志雄, . 竖向和水平组合荷载下能量桩单桩变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 788-796.
[2] 凌造, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 李波, 苏定立, . 非挤土嵌岩预应力高强度混凝土管桩的桩端承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 97-107.
[3] 任连伟, 任军洋, 孔纲强, 刘汉龙, . 冷热循环下PHC能量桩热力响应 和承载性能现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 529-536.
[4] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[5] 费康, 朱志慧, 石雨恒, 周莹. 能量桩群桩工作特性简化分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3889-3898.
[6] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[7] 芮 瑞, 孙 义, 朱 勇, 吴端正, 夏元友, . 刚性基础下复合地基褥垫层细观工作机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 445-454.
[8] 任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[9] 费 康, 戴 迪, 洪 伟, . 能量桩单桩工作特性简化分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 70-80.
[10] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[11] 费 康,钱 健,洪 伟,刘汉龙,. 黏土地基中能量桩力学特性数值分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2651-2661.
[12] 王成龙,刘汉龙,孔纲强,吴宏伟,李建斌, . 不同刚度约束对能量桩应力和位移的影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4261-4268.
[13] 孔纲强,王成龙,刘汉龙,吴 迪,车 平,. 多次温度循环对能量桩桩顶位移影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 958-964.
[14] 刘汉龙,吴 迪,孔纲强,王成龙,吴宏伟,. 预埋与绑扎埋管形式能量桩传热特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 333-340.
[15] 刘汉龙,王成龙,孔纲强,吴 迪,. U型、W型和螺旋型埋管形式能量桩热力学特性对比模型试验[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 441-447.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!