岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 1084-1094.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0724CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0724

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究

董建华1, 2, 3,杨博1,田文通1, 4,吴晓磊1,何鹏飞1, 2, 3,赵律华4,连博1   

  1. 1.兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;2.兰州理工大学 甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730050; 3.兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730050; 4.中国地震局兰州地震研究所 中国地震局(甘肃省)黄土地震工程重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-11 接受日期:2024-11-12 出版日期:2025-04-11 发布日期:2025-04-11
  • 作者简介:董建华,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事冻土静动力分析与设计方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: djhua512@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52178335, No.52438345);水利部重大科技项目(No.SKS-2022166);甘肃省科技重大专项计划(No.24ZDCA010);教育部产学合作协同育人项目(No.22107031081835)。

Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response

DONG Jian-hua1, 2, 3, YANG Bo1, TIAN Wen-tong1, 4, WU Xiao-lei1, HE Peng-fei1, 2, 3, ZHAO Lü-hua4, LIAN Bo1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 3. Western Engineering Research Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2024-06-11 Accepted:2024-11-12 Online:2025-04-11 Published:2025-04-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178335, 52438345), the Major Scientific and Technological Projects of the Ministry of Water Resources (SKS-2022166), the Gansu Province Major Science and Technology Special Project (24ZDCA010) and the University-Industry Collaborative Education Program (22107031081835).

摘要: 地震诱发液化滑坡灾害严重,为解决含可液化土层边坡的支护治理问题,基于“防抗结合”的理念,集主动“排水”和被动“抗滑”为一体,提出了一种新型防液化抗滑桩。为检验新型抗滑桩的抗液化效果,基于黄河上游流域含可液化土层边坡的勘察资料,抽象概化含可液化土层的边坡模型,设计开展了新型抗滑桩和普通抗滑桩对比分析的大型振动台模型试验,得出了地震作用下不同类型抗滑桩支护可液化土层边坡的破坏模式和土体超孔压动力响应特性。结果表明:地震作用下,抗滑桩支护含液化土层边坡破坏模式为地震诱发-液化层上覆土层水平甩出-液化土层底部坡面鼓包剪出-抗滑桩前土体流滑堆积;相较普通抗滑桩,新型防液化抗滑桩可快速有效消散桩周土体超孔压,能有效防止桩周土体液化,达到防液化的设计目标。研究结果验证了防液化抗滑桩的可靠性,对减轻地震液化滑坡灾害具有重要参考价值。

关键词: 地震液化滑坡, 新型防液化抗滑桩, 超孔隙水压力, 振动台试验

Abstract: Liquefied landslide disasters induced by earthquake are serious, in order to solve the problem of support and management of slopes with liquefiable soil layer, a novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction is proposed based on the concept of "combination of prevention and resistance", which integrates active drainage and passive anti-slip. To evaluate the effectiveness of the novel anti-slide pile in preventing liquefaction, a slope model was developed based on survey data from slopes with liquefiable soil layers in the upper Yellow River region. A large-scale shaking table model test was conducted to compare the novel anti-slide pile with conventional ones. The failure mode and dynamic response characteristics of excess pore water pressure in soil of the slope with liquefiable soil layer supported by different types of anti-slide piles under earthquake are obtained. The results indicate that the failure mode of slope with liquefied soil layer supported by anti-slide pile under earthquake is earthquake-induced-horizontal ejection of overlying soil layer on liquefied soil layer-bulging, shearing of slope surface at the bottom of liquefied soil layer-flowing and sliding accumulation of soil in front of anti-slide pile. In comparison to conventional anti-slide piles, the novel anti-slide pile for liquefaction prevention can rapidly and efficiently dissipate excess pore pressure in the surrounding soil. This mechanism effectively prevents liquefaction around the pile, achieving the goal of liquefaction prevention. The research findings confirm the reliability of the novel anti-slide pile for liquefaction prevention, providing valuable insights for mitigating seismic liquefaction landslide disasters.

Key words: seismic liquefaction landslide, novel anti-slide pile for liquefaction prevention, excess pore water pressure, shaking table test

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[2] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[3] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[4] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[5] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[6] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[7] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[8] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[9] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[11] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[12] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[13] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[14] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[15] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!