岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3289-3299.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2190

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深基坑地连墙支护体系协调变形规律试验研究

陈保国1,闫腾飞1,王程鹏1,宗秋雷2   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 中国水利水电第七工程局有限公司,四川 成都 610081
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-02 修回日期:2020-05-12 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 作者简介:陈保国,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地下建筑工程方面的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41602319,No. 51108434);中国地质大学(武汉)教学实验室开放基金(No. SKJ2018114)。

Experimental study on compatible deformation of diaphragm wall support system for deep foundation pit

CHEN Bao-guo1, YAN Teng-fei1, WANG Cheng-peng1, ZONG Qiu-lei2   

  1. 1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 2. Sinohydro Bureau 7 Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610081, China
  • Received:2020-01-02 Revised:2020-05-12 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602319, 51108434??) and the Open Fund for Teaching Laboratory of China University of Geosciences (SKJ2018114?).

摘要: 深基坑地连墙支护体系中局部应力集中问题,以及施工过程中的实际变形与设计值之间往往存在较大差异造成施工风险。通过设计模型试验,采用可伸缩的内支撑体系来解决上述问题。研究了内支撑体系、地连墙和墙后土体之间的协调变形特性;得出了内支撑的轴力、墙后水平土压力、基坑周围地表位移、地连墙的最大变形量等随支撑体系调节方式的变化规律;提出了地连墙支护体系协调变形智能调节方法。研究发现,相同的位移控制条件下,上部支撑伸缩引起的轴力变化量最大,底部支撑伸缩次之,4道支撑同时伸缩时影响最小;但是,支撑伸缩的位置越深,对地表竖向位移的影响范围越大,4道支撑同时伸缩对地表位移的影响范围和幅度大于单独伸缩某一道内支撑;支撑伸长可明显减小地连墙水平位移,但是会导致支撑轴力急剧增大。结果表明,实际工程中并非基坑水平位移控制越严格,支护体系就越安全,而是应合理控制内支撑伸缩长度,加强支撑轴力和位移监测。

关键词: 深基坑, 支护体系, 协调变形, 模型试验

Abstract: The stress concentration in diaphragm wall support system, combined with an intolerable difference between deformation of diaphragm wall occurred during the construction process and predicted by design probably result in large construction risk. The paper solved these problems by model tests in which an adjustable device was set on the support system. The compatible deformation among the support system, the diaphragm wall and the ground soil behind the diaphragm wall were investigated. The variation of the support axial force, the lateral earth pressure on the diaphragm wall, the ground surface settlement around the foundation pit and the maximum deformation of the diaphragm wall with the adjustment mode of supports were obtained. A smart regulation method for compatible deformation of the diaphragm wall support system was proposed. The results show that under a constant displacement condition, the variation of support axial force caused by the adjustment of the upper support is the largest, by the adjustment of the bottom support is secondary, and by the simultaneous adjustment of the four supports is the smallest. However, the influence range of the ground surface displacement increases with the depth of the adjusted support, but the amplitude decreases. The influence range and amplitude of the simultaneous adjustment of the four supports are larger than that of the adjustment of a single support. The lateral displacement of the diaphragm wall can be reduced by the extension of the support, but the axial force of the support will increase sharply. It can be concluded that it is not wise to strictly control the horizontal displacement of foundation pit. Instead, a reasonable adjusted displacement of support and the monitoring of the support axial force and displacement in succession are recommend.

Key words: deep foundation pit, support system, compatible deformation, model test

中图分类号: TU 476
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[11] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 雷华阳, 杨洋, 许英刚. 不同埋深条件下盾构施工扰动试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!