岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3317-3325.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0050

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

自由段先注浆对预应力锚索抗拔试验结果影响研究

杨庆光,柳 雄,刘杰,何杰,梁凌川,陈斌   

  1. 湖南工业大学 土木工程学院,湖南 株洲 412007
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-14 修回日期:2020-06-06 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 作者简介:杨庆光,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,主要从事桩土相互作用理论等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51978260);湖南省自然科学基金(No. 2020JJ6080,No.2020JJ6007,No.2019JJ60051)。

Influence of the pre-grouting in free segment on the pullout test of prestressed anchor cable

YANG Qing-guang, LIU Xiong, LIU Jie, HE Jie, LIANG Ling-chuan, CHEN Bin   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan 412007, China
  • Received:2020-01-14 Revised:2020-06-06 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978260) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ6080, 2020JJ6007, 2019JJ60051).

摘要: 为了解决无法采用已注浆锚索进行抗拔试验问题,基于界面脱黏剪切模型,利用荷载传递和弹性变形理论,考虑锚索锚固段与自由段长度比Lb /La的影响,建立了采用自由段已注浆锚索抗拔试验结果评价锚索抗拔性能的方法。结果表明:自由段注浆对锚索抗拔力有较大幅度的提高,尤其是当界面剪切阶段由弹性向脱黏过渡时,提高比例快速增加,并在脱黏后逐渐趋于稳定。其次,锚索自由段与锚固段交界面处剪切位移和轴力最大,并向两端逐渐降低。随着拉拔力的提高,界面剪切位移和轴力都不断增大,同时向锚索两端的衰减速度也加快。此外,弹性阶段时剪应力曲线为山峰型,而脱黏阶段为马鞍型,并随抗拔力的提高,马鞍开口逐渐扩大。最后,锚固段与自由段长度比Lb /La对锚索极限抗拔力的影响较小,其极限抗拔力折减系数?Q取值介于0.81~0.83之间,且Lb /La =2.5时,?Q计算值仅比实测结果小6.02%,验证了本文方法的可行性。

关键词: 预应力锚索, 自由段先注浆, 界面脱黏, 抗拔特性, 荷载传递

Abstract: To overcome the drawback that the ultimate pullout resistance of prestressed anchor cable cannot be directly obtained by the pullout test, this study proposes a pullout resistance performance evaluation method of pre-stressed anchor cable based on the pullout tests on prestressed anchor cable with pre-grounting in the free segment. Based on the interfacial debonding shear model and the theories of load transfer and elastic deformation, the length ratio of the anchor segment to the free segment was considered in the evaluation method. The results indicate that pre-grouting in free segment can significantly improve the pullout resistance capability of anchor cable. When the interfacial deformation behavior transfers from an elastic manner to debonding stage, the improvement of the pullout resistance will be more pronounced, which will tend to be stable after debonding. The shear displacement and axial force at the interface of the free segment and grouting segment is the highest. With increasing the pullout force, both the shear displacement and axial force increase but the increment declines to the two ends of anchor cable. The shear stress curve is one peak type in the elastic stage and then becomes a saddle type in the debonding stage. The opening of the saddle type curve becomes larger with the improvement of the pullout resistance. Finally, the length ratio of anchoring and free segment has insignificant effects to the ultimate pullout resistance. The reduction coefficient ?Q of the ultimate pullout resistance of pre-grouting anchor cable is in the range from 0.81 to 0.83. The empirical method in paper is feasible due to the fact that merely 6.02% error is existed between the measured ultimate pullout resistance and calculation result when Lb /La is 2.5.

Key words: prestressed anchor cable, pre-grouting in free segment, interfacial debonding, pullout resistance feature, load transfer

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[2] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[3] 邓友生, 姚志刚, 冯爱林, 李龙, 孟丽青, 肇慧玲, . 不同垫层下煤矸石桩网复合路基承载特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1895-1905.
[4] 叶帅华, 辛亮亮, . 基于桩-土界面剪切特性的单桩沉降和承载问题研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1457-1471.
[5] 邓东平, 杨春会, 谢志军, . 非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1051-1066.
[6] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[7] 陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[8] 黄炜, 简文彬, 杨坚, 豆红强, 罗金妹, . 多支盘锚杆的原型试验与荷载传递特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[9] 周杨, 陈永辉, 孔纲强, 陈龙, 陈庚. 路堤荷载下浅层就地固化联合管桩复合地基 桩−土应力比及沉降计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 688-696.
[10] 冯忠居, 江冠, 赵瑞欣, 龙厚胜, 王政斌, 张正旭, . 基于多因素耦合效应的锚索预应力长期损失研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[11] 侯振坤, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 黎剑华, 张树文, 徐晓斌, 刘春林, . 随钻跟管桩竖向承载性能原位试验 与室内物理模拟试验对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 419-429.
[12] 宫跃航, 李明宝, 郑俊杰, . 三角形布桩下桩承式加筋路堤荷载传递效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3051-3058.
[13] 安彩龙, 梁 烨, 王亮清, 邓 姗, 孙自豪, 范斌强, 郑罗斌. 岩质边坡楔形体锚索加固方向角三维优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2765-2772.
[14] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[15] 贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!