岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3307-3316.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2183

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

静钻根植能源桩承载特性模型试验研究

李富远1,王忠瑾2,谢新宇1, 2,娄扬1,王奎华1,方鹏飞2,郑凌逶2, 3   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 滨海和城市岩土工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310058;2. 浙大宁波理工学院,浙江 宁波 315100; 3. 浙江大学 宁波研究院,浙江 宁波 315100
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-30 修回日期:2020-05-11 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 王忠瑾,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事桩基工程、基础工程、能源桩等研究。E-mail: zhongjin_wang@zju.edu.cn. E-mail:21712224@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李富远,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事能源桩承载特性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51708496);浙江省自然科学基金(No. LY20E080001);宁波市自然科学基金(No. 2019A610396)。

Model test on bearing characteristic of static drill rooted energy pile

LI Fu-yuan1, WANG Zhong-jin2, XIE Xin-yu1, 2, LOU Yang1, WANG Kui-hua1, FANG Peng-fei2, ZHENG Ling-wei2, 3   

  1. 1. Research Center of Coastal and Urban Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. NingboTech University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China; 3. Ningbo Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315100, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Revised:2020-05-11 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708496), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY20E080001) and the Ningbo Municipal Natural Science Foundation (2019A610396).

摘要: 为了研究静钻根植能源桩在热?力耦合作用下的承载特性,采用自行设计模型试验系统,测试模型桩在黏?砂双层地基中的热力响应。试验结果表明:桩体温度沿深度变化并不均匀,对桩周土的温度影响半径为3倍桩径;3次冷热循环后桩顶和桩周土表面均产生累积沉降,在桩顶荷载达到单桩极限承载力的25%时,桩顶累积沉降达到桩径的3.12‰,是桩顶无荷载情况下的1.77倍;模型桩附加温度应力沿深度分布均表现为中间大两端小,位移变化零点(附加温度应力最大处)随着桩顶荷载增大(约束增强)而上移,桩顶荷载较小时降温引起桩身局部产生拉应力。因此,静钻根植能源桩的承载特性与温度变化条件、桩顶荷载大小和桩端约束条件密切相关,在工程设计中需要综合考虑以确保运行安全性。

关键词: 静钻根植能源桩, 热?力耦合, 附加温度应力, 模型试验, 承载特性

Abstract: In order to study the bearing characteristic of static drill rooted energy piles under thermo-mechanical coupling conditions, a self-designed model test system has been used to evaluate the thermal response of the model pile in the clay-sand double-layered foundation. The results show that the temperature of the pile is non-uniformly distributed along the depth, and the radius of thermally affected region around the pile is 3 times of its diameter. Accumulated settlements are observed on the pile top and the surrounding soil surface after 3 heating-cooling cycles. Driven under the load of 25% of the ultimate bearing capacity on top, the cumulative settlement of single pile reached 3.12‰ of the pile diameter, which is 1.77 times that of the pile top under non loading condition. Larger additional thermal stress performs at the pile middle than both ends, and the null point (where lies maximum additional thermal stress) moves upward with the increase of the pile top load. In fact, it has been observed that under small load on the top, local tensile stress occurs in the pile body due to cooling. Therefore, the bearing characteristic of static drill rooted energy pile is of high relevance to temperature change, load on pile top and stress boundaries of pile ends, and that requires comprehensively consideration in engineering design to guarantee safety service of pile.

Key words: static drill rooted energy pile, thermo-mechanical coupling, additional thermal stress, model test, bearing characteristic

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[13] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[14] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[15] 孙旻洋, 王忠瑾, 谢新宇, 张日红, 娄扬, 朱大勇, . 饱和黏土中能源群桩热力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 382-390.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!