岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 177-185.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0550

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载 特性模型试验研究

刘春林1, 2,唐孟雄1,胡贺松1,岳云鹏1, 3,侯振坤1, 2,陈航1   

  1. 1. 广州市建筑科学研究院有限公司,广州 广东 510440;2. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广州 广东 510641; 3. 广州大学 土木工程学院,广州 广东 510006
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-06 修回日期:2020-10-09 出版日期:2021-01-11 发布日期:2021-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 岳云鹏,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事桩基工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: yueyunpenggzu@163.com E-mail:liuchunlin2007@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘春林,男,1987年生,博士后,高级工程师,主要从事土与结构共同作用方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51908225,No. 51678171);中国博士后科学基金项目(No. 2019M652899);广东省基础与应用基础基金项目(No. 2019A1515110836);广州珠江科技新星项目(No. 201806010095)。

An experimental study of vertical bearing capacity of DPC piles considering sediment effect at pile bottom

LIU Chun-lin1, 2, TANG Meng-xiong1, HU He-song1, YUE Yun-peng1, 3, HOU Zhen-kun1, 2, CHEN Hang1   

  1. 1. Guangzhou Institute of Building Science Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510440, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2020-05-06 Revised:2020-10-09 Online:2021-01-11 Published:2021-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This word was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908225, 51678171), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project (2019M652899), the Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund of Guangdong (2019A1515110836) and the Peal River S & T Nova of Guangzhou (201806010095).

摘要: 随钻跟管桩施工不能完全清除桩底岩土沉渣,从而影响桩基端承力。为揭示桩底沉渣对随钻跟管桩承载力的影响机制,开展了考虑桩底沉渣影响的随钻跟管桩竖向承载特性模型试验研究。试验结果表明:在密砂地层中,具有桩端水泥土扩大头的随钻跟管桩,其桩顶荷载?沉降曲线为缓降型,而模拟试验的其他管桩均为陡降型;桩底沉渣降低随钻跟管桩的极限承载力在22%以内,且其桩顶荷载主要由桩侧摩阻力承担,承担占比超过90%;与存在一定厚度沉渣的钻孔灌注桩相比,随钻跟管桩的桩底沉渣对降低承载力的影响相对较小;靠近桩端的轴力随着沉渣厚度的增加而减小,沉渣越厚,减少的幅度越明显;桩端水泥土扩大头施工可提高随钻跟管桩约37%的承载力,且桩端阻比均小于15%。现场原位测试(桩长为15.5 m,长径比为15.50)和室内模型试验(桩长为1 m,长径比为15.87)结果均表明:存在桩底沉渣时,随钻跟管桩是以发挥侧摩阻力为主的端承摩擦型桩。研究成果有助于进一步加深对随钻跟管桩承载性状的认识。

关键词: 模型试验, 随钻跟管桩, 桩底沉渣, 桩基础, 承载性能

Abstract: The pile bottom sediments cannot be cleaned up completely during the construction process of drilling with pre-stressed concrete pile cased (DPC) piles, which may lead to the loss of bearing capacity of the pile. Model tests for DPC piles with consideration of the pile bottom sediment effect are carried out in this paper. The load-settlement curves of DPC piles with enlarged cement-soil pile end show slow-varying, while other tests of DPC piles with pile end sediments show sharply down. The influences of the sediment thickness and enlarged pile end on the vertical bearing characteristics are studied. Experimental results show that the pile end sediment has a certain impact on the vertical bearing capacity of the DPC pile, and its bearing capacity can be improved by around 22% after removing the sediments. Compared with the bored cast-in-place pile with a certain thickness of sediment, the sediment at the bottom of DPC piles has less effect on reducing the bearing capacity. Besides, DPC piles with expanded cement-soil pile end can increase the bearing capacity by 37% in approximation. The external load of the DPC piles with pile bottom sediments is generally borne by the pile side frictions for more than 90%, and the pile axial forces near the pile end become smaller with thicker sediments. In dense sand strata, the pile end resistance ratios of DPC piles are less than 15%. Both in-situ (pile length 15.5 m, pile length-diameter ratio 15.50) and indoor model test (pile length 1.0 m, pile length-diameter ratio 15.87) results show that DPC piles with pile bottom sediments are the type of end bearing friction piles. These research findings may provide a reference for further understanding the bearing characteristics of DPC piles.

Key words: model test, DPC pile, pile bottom sediment, pile foundation, bearing characteristics

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[12] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[13] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!