岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 3910-3918.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0425

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

爆破荷载下围岩及支护锚杆动力响应特征 模型试验研究

陈士海1, 2,宫嘉辰1,胡帅伟1   

  1. 1. 华侨大学 土木工程学院,福建 厦门 361021;2. 华侨大学 福建省隧道与城市地下空间工程技术研究中心,福建 厦门 361021
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-13 修回日期:2020-07-07 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-15
  • 作者简介:陈士海,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程防灾减灾方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51974136);爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室开放课题(No.DPMEIKF201307);华侨大学科研基金项目(No.13BS402)。

Model test study on dynamic response characteristics of host rockmass and supporting bolt under blasting load

CHEN Shi-hai1, 2, GONG Jia-chen1, HU Shuai-wei1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China; 2. Fujian Research Center for Tunneling and Urban Underground Space Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China
  • Received:2020-04-13 Revised:2020-07-07 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51974136), the Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention & Mitigation of Explosion & Impact(PLA University and Technology) (DPMEIKF201307) and the Huaqiao University Research Foundation(13BS402).

摘要: 为了研究爆破荷载下围岩及支护锚杆动力响应特征,借助地下工程模型试验系统,开展了三维动态加载物理模型试验,采用电火花震源代替传统炸药,测试了爆破地震波在围岩中的传播规律和支护锚杆的动力响应特征。试验研究表明,电火花震源具有冲击荷载特性,能够很好地代替传统烈性炸药。爆破地震波的径向加速度峰值以及轴向和环向应变峰值沿洞室径向不是逐级递减,而是呈现正负交替波浪式衰减;加速度峰值沿洞室轴向基本上呈现非线性逐渐递减。加速度峰值受震源荷载幅值的影响较大,即震源荷载越大,同一测点加速度峰值越大。另外,测量了爆破荷载作用下支护锚杆的振动特性,发现对于加长锚固锚杆,自由段主要以受拉状态为主,锚固段拉压状态都存在。锚固段和自由段的最大拉应变大致相同,而锚固段的最大压应变远大于自由段,而且锚固段和自由段振动持续时间大致相同。对于全锚锚杆,锚杆既存在拉伸状态,又存在压缩状态,拉伸应变大于压缩应变。对于端锚锚杆,其受力状态主要以受拉状态为主,拉伸应变远大于压缩应变。研究结论不仅具有重要的理论意义,也能够为地下洞室支护设计提供可预见性指导。

关键词: 模型试验, 电火花震源, 爆破地震波, 支护锚杆, 动力响应

Abstract: To study the dynamic response characteristics of host rockmass and supporting bolt under blasting load, a three-dimensional dynamic loading physical model test was performed using an underground engineering model test system. The propagation law of blasting seismic wave and the dynamic response characteristics of supporting bolt were tested using electric spark source instead of traditional explosives. Experimental research results show that the electric spark source has the characteristic of the impact loading, which can well replace traditional high explosives. The radial acceleration peak values and the axial and hoop strain peak values of blasting seismic wave within host rock do not decrease gradually as the increasing of the radial distance along the excavation, but show a wave-like attenuation pattern of positive and negative alternating. In addition, the acceleration peak values show a nonlinear and decrease gradually along the excavation axial direction. The peak acceleration values are affected largely by the seismic load amplitude, that is, the higher the source load, the higher the peak acceleration value at the same measurement point. In addition, the vibration characteristics of the supporting bolt were measured under blasting load. It is found that the extension anchor bolt, the free section of the anchor bolt is mainly in tension state, but the anchor section of the bolt is in the state of both tension and compression. The maximum tensile strain of the anchor and free section is approximately the same, while the maximum compressive strain of the anchor section is much larger than that of the free section. The vibration duration of anchor section and free section is also approximately similar. As for the full-anchored bolt, the bolt has subjected both a tensile state and a compressive state, and the tensile strain is greater than the compressive strain. As for the end-anchored bolt, the stress state is mainly in the tension state, and the tensile strain is much greater than the compressive strain. The research conclusion not only has important theoretical significance, but also can provide predictable guidance for the ground support design of underground excavation.

Key words: model test, electric spark source, blasting seismic wave, supporting bolt, dynamic response

中图分类号: TU457
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[15] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!