岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 601-610.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0906

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

动渗耦合作用下软黏土动力特性试验研究

雷华阳1, 2, 3,许英刚1,缪姜燕1,刘旭1   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院 土木工程系,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350; 3. 中国地震局 地震工程综合模拟与城乡抗震韧性重点实验室,天津 300350
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-28 修回日期:2020-12-24 出版日期:2021-03-11 发布日期:2021-03-15
  • 作者简介:雷华阳,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程教学与科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC0805407);国家自然科学基金重大项目(No.51890911);土木工程防灾国家重点实验室开放课题基金(No.SLDRCE17-01)

Experimental investigation on dynamic properties of soft clay under coupled cyclic-seepage loads

LEI Hua-yang1, 2, 3, XU Ying-gang1, MIAO Jiang-yan1, LIU Xu1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Education Ministry, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering Simulation and Seismic Resilience, China Earthquake Administration, Tianjin 300350, China)
  • Received:2020-06-28 Revised:2020-12-24 Online:2021-03-11 Published:2021-03-15
  • Supported by:
    the National Key R&D Plan(2017YFC0805407), the Major Projects of the National Natural Science Foundation(51890911) and the Open Project Fund of State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering(SLDRCE17-01).

摘要: 针对天津地区饱和软黏土,开展了一系列动渗耦合作用下的循环三轴试验。结果表明,软黏土在动渗耦合作用下累积塑性应变发展呈现初期瞬时增长、减速增加、稳定/线性发展3阶段特征;渗流力的存在使得软黏土的动力变形增大1~2倍,且渗流力越大,累积塑性变形增幅越大;振动频率越小,动应力越高,累积塑性应变越大;建立了考虑渗流力作用的软黏土累积塑性应变预测模型;渗流力的存在使得加载初期滞回曲线向应变轴倾斜程度增大;动渗耦合下软黏土的动弹性模量随应变发展先增加后减小,且渗流力越大,模量越低;定义了动弹性模量的换算系数,揭示了其与累积塑性应变的变化规律,建立了考虑渗流力、频率影响的动弹性模量归一化预测模型;渗流力越大,阻尼比的衰减幅度越大,且在振动末期,其阻尼比近似为0.02~0.04。研究成果可以为流固耦合条件下的场地动力特性分析提供理论参考。

关键词: 软黏土, 动渗耦合, 累积塑性应变, 渗流, 动弹性模量, 阻尼比

Abstract: In this paper, a series of triaxial tests under coupled cyclic-seepage loads was carried out for saturated soft clay in Tianjin. The results show that the development of cumulative plastic strain is characterized by three stages: initial instantaneous growth, decelerated increase and stable / linear development, and seepage can enlarge the dynamic deformation up to 1?2 times of that compared to cyclic load only. Larger seepage force induces greater cumulative plastic deformation. The lower frequency or greater cyclic stress amplitude induces larger strain. The prediction model of cumulative plastic deformation of soft clay is established under the condition of dynamic-seepage coupling. The presence of seepage induces greater inclination to strain axis of hysteric curve at initial vibration. The dynamic elastic modulus of soft clay increases firstly and then decreases, and the larger seepage force induces lower modulus; the mathematical relationship between dynamic elastic modulus and cumulative plastic strain is revealed: under seepage condition, a prediction model of dynamic modulus was proposed considering the influences of seepage force and frequency. The damp ratio decreases to a constant value with increasing number of cycles. The larger the seepage force is, the larger the damping ratio attenuation amplitude is, and the damping ratio is approximately 0.02?0.04 at the end of the vibration. The results could provide guidance on the numerical simulation of dynamic characteristics of soft clay ground under seepage condition.

Key words: soft clay, dynamic-seepage coupling, cumulative plastic strain, seepage, dynamic modulus, damping ratio

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[4] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[5] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[6] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[7] 任旺, 苗君, 雷万钧, 王络, 陈益峰, . 混凝土坝坝基立体排水的数值模拟与优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2281-2295.
[8] 刘杰, 钟伦伟, 钟振, 张宪尚, 隆清明, 应鹏, . 恒定法向刚度边界条件下受剪岩石裂隙非线性渗流特性的数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1919-1933.
[9] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[10] 邓汉鑫, 武东生, 王晓光, 王东坡. 非均质孔隙介质中循环驱替对两相渗流及毛细捕获的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 505-514.
[11] 王浩, 侯泓冰, 江文豪, . 考虑根系对水文特性影响下非饱和植被土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3329-3345.
[12] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[13] 张仁君, 肖碧, 杨志兵, 郑小康, 胡冉, 陈益峰. 裂隙介质中毛细黏聚作用影响颗粒运移-堵塞机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3473-3484.
[14] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[15] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!