岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 228-237.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0007CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究

董 林,陈强,夏坤,李彦苍,李燕,王晓磊   

  1. 河北工程大学,土木工程学院,河北 邯郸 056038
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-02 接受日期:2024-03-12 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-27
  • 作者简介:董林,男,1985年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究。E-mail: donglin408@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51708525,No.52278171)。

Effects of plasticity on liquefaction and cyclic softening characteristics of fine-grained soils

DONG Lin, CHEN Qiang, XIA Kun, LI Yan-cang, LI Yan, WANG Xiao-lei   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, Hebei 056038, China
  • Received:2024-01-02 Accepted:2024-03-12 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-27
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708525, 52278171).

摘要: 为研究软黏土循环软化与粉土液化的特性差异,包括黏性(可塑性)对饱和细粒土动强度及孔压特性的影响,以及孔压对土体动模量阻尼比的影响趋势。选取邯郸市一种典型粉土与两种粉质黏土,并对粉土添加不同含量蒙脱石黏粒,开展均等固结动三轴试验。结果表明:粉土试样(FT)表现出典型的液化试验现象,孔压比能够达到1.0,且孔压比超过0.6后,动应力大幅衰减,滞回圈逐渐变水平。粉土添加5%、10%、15%、20%黏粒试样孔压比均超过0.8,动应力和滞回圈与粉土现象类似。粉质黏土峰值孔压不能达到围压,孔压比低于0.7,孔压波动幅度大,动应力衰减缓慢,滞回圈形态饱满。保持等干密度对粉土添加黏粒,动强度先降再升,粉质黏土强度显著高于粉土。随黏性增强,双幅应变为5%时的振次孔压比逐渐降低。5组粉土模量比随孔压上升快速下降,且均在孔压比达到0.8后,模量接近0并趋于平缓。在相同的应变水平下,两组粉质黏土模量比整体高于5组粉土。黏性最强的粉质黏土(FN1)阻尼比随孔压上升而一直上升,其他试样阻尼比都是先增大后减小,粉土试样(FT)液化时阻尼比接近0。土样黏性越强,双幅应变为5%时振次阻尼比越大。

关键词: 饱和细粒土, 黏性(可塑性), 动三轴试验, 孔隙水压力, 动模量, 阻尼比

Abstract: To investigate the characteristic differences between soft clay cyclic softening and silt liquefaction, as well as the effects of plasticity on dynamic strength and pore water pressure, and the influence trend of pore water pressure on the dynamic modulus and damping ratio of fine-grained soils, a typical silt and two types of silty clay from Handan, along with silts mixed with varying montmorillonite clay content, were tested using a cyclic triaxial apparatus. The test results indicate that the silt sample (FT) exhibits typical liquefaction behavior, with a pore pressure ratio reaching 1.0. Once the ratio exceeds 0.6, dynamic stress attenuates significantly, and the stress-strain hysteresis loop becomes progressively flatter. For silts with 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% clay content, the pore pressure ratio exceeds 0.8, and the dynamic stress and hysteresis loop characteristics are similar to those of the silt sample (FT). The peak pore pressure of silty clays does not reach the confining pressure, with pore pressure ratios below 0.7. These samples exhibit significant pore pressure fluctuations, slow attenuation of dynamic stress, and broader hysteresis loops. The cyclic strength of silts with varying clay content and constant dry density first decreases and then increases. The strength of silty clays is significantly higher than that of silts. The pore pressure ratio for cycles producing 5% double amplitude axial strain decreases gradually with increasing plasticity. The modulus ratio of the five silts decreases rapidly as pore pressure increases. Once the pore pressure ratio reaches 0.8, the modulus approaches 0 and tends to stabilize. The modulus ratio of the two silty clays is higher than that of the five silts at similar strain levels. The damping ratio of the most cohesive silty clay (FN1) increases with rising pore pressure. Other samples initially increase and then decrease in damping ratio, while the damping ratio of the silt sample (FT) approaches 0 upon liquefaction. In this study, the damping ratio of soils during cycles producing 5% double amplitude axial strain increases gradually with increasing plasticity.

Key words: saturated fine-grained soils, plasticity, cyclic triaxial test, pore water pressure, dynamic modulus, damping ratio

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[2] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[5] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[6] 刘璐, 李帅学, 张鑫磊, 高洪梅, 王志华, 肖杨. 微生物加固珊瑚砂动剪切模量与阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3410-3420.
[7] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[8] 王丽艳, 蒋飞, 庄海洋, 王炳辉, 张雷, 李明, . 考虑水化期影响的橡胶−钢渣填料动力特性与微观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 53-62.
[9] 肖思奇, 黄科锋, 周红波, . 基于动三轴试验的软黏土软化系数的分析与预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 133-146.
[10] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[11] 张大伟, 李昊泽, 刘飞禹, 冯忞, . 双向循环荷载作用下胶−砂粒径比对橡胶砂剪切特性影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 239-247.
[12] 谢森林, 胡安峰, 肖志荣, 汪美慧, 胡训健, 陈俞超, . 基于广义Voigt模型的半渗透边界隧道周围饱和软土固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
[13] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[14] 金丹丹, 鲁先东, 王炳辉, 施展, 张雷, . 冲击荷载下含夹层饱和砂土孔压变化规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1081-1091.
[15] 黄锋, 米吉龙, 杨永浩, 董广法, 张班, 刘星辰, . 分级动荷载下土石混合体滞回曲线形态特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 674-684.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!