岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 954-962.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1191

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于拉拔试验和离散元模拟的单、双层土工 格栅加固道砟的研究

陈成,段永达,芮瑞,汪伦   

  1. 武汉理工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430070
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-12 修回日期:2020-10-13 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 芮瑞,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程加固设计与理论方面的研究。E-mail: r.rui@whut.edu.cn E-mail:chengchen87@whut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈成,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事道砟颗粒材料力学特性及离散元数值模拟研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51708438);中央高校基本科研业务费(No. 2018IVB029)

Study of single and two-layer geogrid reinforced ballasted trackbed using pull-out test and discrete element method

CHEN Cheng, DUAN Yong-da, RUI Rui, WANG Lun   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2020-10-13 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708438) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018IVB029).

摘要: 工程中运用土工格栅加固道床,以通过增强水平约束来减少道砟层竖向累积沉降和侧向位移。为深入研究土工格栅对道砟的加固机制,采用自制多层格栅拉拔设备,在静荷载下进行了大、小孔径土工格栅的单、双层铺设抗拔试验,分析了格栅孔径、铺设深度及层数对拉拔阻力的影响。通过单层铺设得到不同深度的拉拔阻力标准值,提出了双层加固效应系数?,量化了双层铺设加固能力并探讨了最佳铺设方式。通过离散元方法模拟了65 mm孔径格栅双层铺设于200~300 mm的工况,从细观角度分析拉拔过程中双层格栅加筋道砟内部应力链的和法向接触力矢量的分布情况。结果表明:对于现行规范的级配道砟,65 mm孔径格栅加固能力优于32 mm孔径格栅;双层铺设时的极限拉拔阻力均不同程度地大于单层铺设时两层的拉拔阻力标准值之和,双层加固效应的发挥与格栅孔径及双层间距有一定的联系。模拟结果也验证了在拉拔过程中,双层格栅之间形成加固效应的叠加,法向接触力矢量分布情况表明双层格栅存在联锁加固效应。

关键词: 道砟, 土工格栅, 拉拔试验, 双层加固, 加固效应系数, 离散元方法

Abstract: Geogrid is used to reinforce the trackbed by increasing the confining pressure and reducing the vertical cumulative settlement and lateral displacement of ballast. In order to further study the reinforcement mechanism of geogrid reinforced ballast, pull-out tests of single and double-layer geogrids with large and small apertures under static load were carried out by using self-designed equipment, and the influences of grid aperture, reinforcement depth and number of layers on pull-out resistance were analyzed. The standard values of pull-out resistance at different depths were obtained by single-layer tests, and the coefficient of double-layer reinforcement was proposed to quantify the reinforcement capacity of double-layer geogrids, and the best laying way was also discussed. Double-layer geogrids with aperture size of 65 mm placed in 200-300 mm were simulated by DEM. The distribution of internal stress chain and contact force vector of geogrid reinforced ballast during pull-out process were analyzed from the micro view. The results show that, for the graded ballast, the geogrid with 65 mm aperture performed better than that with 32 mm aperture; the ultimate pullout resistance of double-layer laying was greater than the sum of the standard values of the two-layer laying. The double-layer reinforcement effect is related to the geogrid aperture and the layer spacing. The simulation results also verified the superposition of reinforcement effect between the two-layer geogrids during pull-out process, and the distribution of normal contact force vector showed that the double-layer geogrid had interlocking reinforcement effect.

Key words: ballast, geogrid, pull-out test, double-layer reinforcement, reinforcement effect coefficient, DEM

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 陶志刚, 李梦楠, 于海军, 范方政, 王炯, . 不同锚固孔径下2G-NPR锚杆锚固特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 67-80.
[2] 王家全, 吴新彪, 董程锋, 张涛艺, . 基于SmartRock传感技术的含砂道砟直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1060-1070.
[3] 常建梅, 田世龙, 李翔, 冯怀平, KUVANDIK Lesov, . 不同形状废旧轮胎橡胶颗粒改良道砟动剪切性能及细观作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 721-728.
[4] 杨家强, 朱玉龙, 奚邦禄, 张振华, . 不同含水率下脏污道砟累积塑性变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 715-722.
[5] 刘宗祺, 陈曦, 崔柳生, 唐建彬. 直剪和双轴离散元数值试验中剪切带宽度的孔隙率场测量技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 742-750.
[6] 蒋明杰, 李泽懿, 吉恩跃, 刘宇菠, 梅国雄, . 考虑级配影响的粗粒土−格栅最优网格尺寸试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[7] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[8] 贾朝军, 庞锐锋, 俞隽, 雷明锋, 李忠, . 基于离散元的岩石冻融损伤劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 588-600.
[9] 郭鹏飞, 王戌, 徐飞龙, 孙岩, 刘鑫. 软弱岩体锚杆物理锚固装置参数优化分析及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2961-2970.
[10] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[11] 蔡永明, 王志杰, 齐逸飞, 杨广庆, 王贺, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶碎石动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 87-96.
[12] 杜炜, 聂如松, 李列列, 谭永长, 张杰, 祁延录, . 考虑不同边界条件的风积沙−土工格栅拉拔试验离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[13] 邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴. 隧道底板渐进破裂碎胀大变形:一种新的底鼓机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1512-1529.
[14] 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 陶云翔, 唐跃, 王炳辉, 蔡晓光, 张雷, . 格栅条带式加筋废旧轮胎胎面挡土墙 抗震性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 931-940.
[15] 骆赵刚, 丁选明, 欧强, 蒋春勇, 方华强, . 土工格栅加筋珊瑚砂的强度及变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1053-1064.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!