岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1126-1132.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1362

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算

杨坚1，简文彬1, 2，黄炜1，黄聪惠1，罗金妹3，李先忠3   

  1. 1. 福州大学 环境与资源学院 岩土与地质工程系，福建 福州 350116；2. 福州大学 福建省地质灾害重点实验室，福建 福州 350003； 3. 中化地质矿山总局福建地质勘查院，福建 福州 350013
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-09 修回日期:2020-11-08 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-26
  • 通讯作者: 简文彬，男，1963年生，博士，教授，主要从事边坡工程、地质灾害及其防治、岩土工程防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail: jwb@fzu.edu.cn E-mail:yj_fzu@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨坚，男，1995年生，硕士研究生，主要从事边坡工程方面研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No. 41861134011）；中化地质矿山总局科技创新团队基金项目（No. 201806291）。

Pull-out test and ultimate bearing capacity calculation of grouting branch-type anchor

YANG Jian1, JIAN Wen-bin1, 2, HUANG Wei1, HUANG Cong-hui1, LUO Jin-mei3, LI Xian-zhong3   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Fujian Province, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China; 3. Fujian Geological Exploration Institute of Geology and Mine Bureau, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China
  • Received:2020-09-09 Revised:2020-11-08 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-26
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41861134011) and the Science and Technology Innovation Team Fund Project of China Chemical Geology and Mine Bureau (201806291).

PDF (Chinese)

283

摘要： 注浆支盘式锚杆是自主研发的一种新型锚杆，具有广阔的应用前景。为了探究支盘式锚杆的承载特性，构建室内试验模型，针对不同的埋置深度、支盘直径和双支盘间距等条件进行拉拔试验，获取相应的荷载?位移曲线，并对部分数据采取无量纲化处理得到埋深比与荷载系数关系曲线，最后通过简化力学模型推导出支盘式锚杆的端阻力与拉拔极限承载力的计算公式。研究结果表明，埋置深度与极限承载力呈非线性关系且存在临界埋深；盘径对抗拔承载力的影响最为显著，与极限承载力呈线性增长关系，极限承载力较普通锚杆提高了2～5倍多；双支盘的分界间距为4倍支盘直径时可充分调用双支盘的承载力，由于双支盘锚杆在加载初期时土体主要为剪切变形，故其荷载?位移曲线开始阶段斜率较单支盘锚杆要大得多；埋深比与荷载系数关系曲线的斜率突变点为临界埋深比，其值为3.02；该计算公式所得结果与4组试验结果基本一致，验证了计算公式的有效性。研究结果对支盘式锚杆的设计和工程应用具有重要的理论及实际意义。

关键词: 支盘式锚杆, 极限承载力, 拉拔试验, 端阻力, 黏土

Abstract: Branch-type anchor is a new type of bolt independently developed by the authors, which has broad application prospects. In order to explore the load-bearing characteristics of branch-type anchors, an indoor test model was constructed, and a series of pull-out tests was carried out for different embedding depths, branch diameters, and double-branch spacing. The corresponding load-displacement curves were obtained, and non-dimensional processing for part of the data was conducted to obtain the relationship curve between the buried depth ratio and the load factor. Finally, a simplified mechanical model was used to derive the calculation formula for the end resistance and the pull-out ultimate bearing capacity of the branch-type anchor. The research results show that there is a nonlinear relationship between the embedment depth and the ultimate bearing capacity, and a critical embedment depth exists. The plate diameter has the most significant impact on the pull-out bearing capacity, which has a linear growth relationship with the ultimate bearing capacity. The ultimate bearing capacity is 2?5 times higher than that of a straight bolt. The bearing capacity of the double plate can be fully used when the separation distance of the double plate is 4 times of the plate diameter. Since the soil is mainly sheared at the initial stage of loading, the initial slope of the load-displacement curve of the double-branch anchor is much larger than that of the single-branch anchor. The sudden change point of the slope of the relationship between the embedment depth ratio and the load factor is the critical embedment ratio, which is 3.02. The results obtained by this formula are basically consistent with those of the four testing groups, which verifies the validity of the calculation formula. The research results have important theoretical and practical significance for the design and engineering application of the branch-type anchor.

Key words: branch-type anchor, ultimate bearing capacity, pull-out tests, end resistance, clay

中图分类号: U 418.5
[1] 陶志刚, 李梦楠, 于海军, 范方政, 王炯, . 不同锚固孔径下2G-NPR锚杆锚固特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 67-80.
[2] 段书苏, 候志强, 王志佳, 胡俊, 张友良, 张建经. D-山梨醇对微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积作用效果及加固红黏土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 238-248.
[3] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[4] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[5] 王梦洁, 张莎莎, 杨晓华, 张超, 晏长根, . 循环荷载作用下漫灌区粉质黏土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1215-1227.
[6] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[7] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[8] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[9] KOCHARYAN Gevorg, OSTAPCHUK Alexey, SHATUNOV Ivan, 戚承志. 含黏土断层滑动行为稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3513-3522.
[10] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[11] 李世昌, 李剑, 余飞, 耿赟, 杨奇志, 王江琛, . 峰前等剪应力幅值下黏土−混凝土接触面小变形特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 208-216.
[12] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
[13] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[14] 高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[15] 冷伍明, 丁荣锋, 杨奇, 陈琛, 邓煜晨, 徐方, 阮波, . 粗糙度对单桩竖向承载变形特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1597-1607.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发