岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1424-1433.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0973

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于非线性模糊层次分析法的TBM 施工风险评价模型研究

宋战平1, 2,郭德赛1,徐甜1,华伟雄3, 4   

  1. 1. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710055;2. 西安建筑科技大学 陕西省岩土与地下空间工程重点实验室,陕西 西安 710055; 3. 中国铁建大桥工程局集团有限公司,天津 300300;4. 中铁建大桥工程局集团第二工程有限公司,广州 深圳 518083
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-08 修回日期:2021-01-04 出版日期:2021-05-11 发布日期:2021-05-08
  • 作者简介:宋战平,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事隧道和地下工程方面的教学和工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51578447);陕西省创新能力支撑计划-创新团队(No. 2020TD-005);陕西省住房城乡建设科技计划项目(No. 2019-K39)

Risk assessment model in TBM construction based on nonlinear fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

SONG Zhan-ping1, 2, GUO De-sai1, XU Tian1, HUA Wei-xiong3, 4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 2. Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Space Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 3. China Railway Construction Bridge Engineering Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300300, China; 4. China Railway Construction Bridge Engineering Bureau Group No.2 Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518083, China
  • Received:2020-07-08 Revised:2021-01-04 Online:2021-05-11 Published:2021-05-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51578447), the Innovation Capability Support Plan of Shaanxi Province- Innovation Team (2020TD-005) and the Science and Technology Project of Housing Urban-rural Construction in Shaanxi Province (2019-K39).

摘要: 隧道掘进机(tunnel boring machine,简称TBM)施工风险评价受到众多不确定因素影响,传统的模糊层次分析法(fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,简称FAHP)使用线性算子计算风险等级,易造成某些突出风险因素的影响被弱化,引起最终评价结果的准确性降低。将非线性算子引入到传统FAHP的综合计算中,建立了基于非线性FAHP的TBM施工风险评价新模型。基于作业分解结构法(WBS)和风险分解结构法(RBS),构建了TBM施工风险指标体系;采用层次分析法计算风险评价指标体系中所有风险因素的权重,结合专家评价法得到的隶属度向量构造模糊关系矩阵;引入非线性算子对风险权重和模糊关系矩阵进行综合分析;在此基础上根据最大隶属度原则,得到TBM施工的最终风险等级。将构建的新模型应用到在建深圳地铁羊台山隧道TBM穿越F2-2次生断层施工的风险分析中,得出TBM穿越该断层洞段施工风险等级为4级,属较高风险。基于羊台山隧道工程实例,讨论了新模型和传统FAHP评价方法的区别,进一步验证了新模型的可靠性。

关键词: 隧道工程, TBM施工, 风险评价, 非线性, 模糊层次分析法

Abstract: Risk assessment of tunnel boring machine (TBM) construction is affected by many uncertain factors. The traditional fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) tends to weaken the influence of some prominent risk factors due to the use of linear operators for calculating risk levels, reducing the accuracy of the final assessment results. This paper introduced a nonlinear operator into the comprehensive calculation of traditional FAHP, and established a new risk assessment model for TBM construction based on the nonlinear FAHP. Based on the work breakdown structure method (WBS) and the risk breakdown structure method (RBS), a risk assessment index system for TBM construction was also established. To calculate the weight of risk factors in the risk assessment index system and to construct the fuzzy relation matrix, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the membership vector obtained from the expert evaluation method were adopted. Through introducing the nonlinear operator, the weight of risk factors and fuzzy relation matrix were analyzed, and on this basis the final risk level for TBM construction was obtained based on the principle of the maximum membership degree. The proposed model was successfully applied to the risk assessment of a TBM crossing the F2-2 secondary fault in Yangtaishan Tunnel of Shenzhen metro and the risk level of TBM construction crossing the fault section was determined to be level 4, which was a high risk. Finally, to further verify the reliability of the proposed model, the difference between the new risk assessment model and the traditional FAHP evaluation method was discussed based on the Yangtaishan Tunnel project.

Key words: tunnel engineering, TBM construction, risk assessment, nonlinear, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 刘雯, 范金洋, 刘文浩, 陈结, 刘伟, 吴斐, . 气压-应力耦合作用下盐岩应力松弛特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2434-2448.
[2] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
[3] 陈灯红, 张心瀚, 刘云辉, 胡昊文, 刘云龙, 梁羽翔, . 基于八叉树比例边界有限元法的高拱坝-不规则地基-库水系统非线性地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2586-2599.
[4] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[5] 田抒平, 王振钰, 张陈蓉, . 大直径单桩基础海上风机非线性共振特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 156-164.
[6] 雷国平, 吴泽雄, 苏栋, 莫烨强, 程马遥, . 考虑桩身材料非线性的微型抗滑桩计算p-y[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 337-348.
[7] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[8] 孙锦鑫, 卢萌盟, 刘干斌, . 高置换率散体材料桩-不透水桩组合型复合地基非线性固结解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2421-2436.
[9] 冯世进, 徐熠, 杨俊毅, 郑奇腾, 张晓磊, . 基于集对-组合赋权的填埋场失稳风险评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2129-2139.
[10] 江学辉, 颜建伟, 罗文俊, 李佳宝, 徐长节. 纵向压力和加固钢板对隧道力学性能影响的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1623-1632.
[11] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[12] 邓东平, 杨春会, 谢志军, . 非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1051-1066.
[13] 雷国平, 苏栋, 程马遥, 刘慧芬, 张维, . 基于被动区土弹簧刚度降低过程的基坑围护结构计算增量法及软化p-y 曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 797-808.
[14] 徐斌, 王星亮, 庞锐, 陈柯好, . 考虑组构演化的砂砾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3197-3211.
[15] 邓东平, 彭一航, 柳梦琦, 李媛媛. 滑面极径-应力-强度耦合关联下非线性破坏特征边坡稳定性极限平衡分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3235-3258.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!