岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2173-2184.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1873

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于界面黏结的含根土抗剪强度极限值估算模型

夏鑫1, 2,姜元俊1,苏立君1,MEHTAB Alam1,李佳佳3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院 水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所,四川 成都 610041; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 四川农业大学 水利水电学院,四川 雅安 625014
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-13 修回日期:2021-03-24 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 姜元俊,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害方面的研究工作。E-mail:yuanjun.jiang.civil@gmail.com E-mail:1321682500@qq.com
  • 作者简介:夏鑫,女,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程、地质灾害预警防治相关方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41761144077);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(No. XDA23090202)。

Estimation model of limit values of shear strength of root-bearing soil based on interface bonding

XIA Xin1, 2, JIANG Yuan-jun1, SU Li-jun1, MEHTAB Alam1, LI Jia-jia3   

  1. 1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan 625014, China
  • Received:2020-12-13 Revised:2021-03-24 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41761144077) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA 23090202).

摘要: 目前根系力学固土定量评估模型中缺乏对根-土界面黏结作用的考虑,为提高量化模型精度及适用性,以广泛应用的Wu模型为基础,结合含根土中根系的破坏模式,通过界面黏结强度参数量化根-土界面间的黏结作用,建立了基于界面黏结的含根土抗剪强度极限值估算模型,考虑了含根土中土体应力、根径、根长、根系与剪切方向初始夹角的影响。含根土直剪试验的实测结果均在估算模型计算值范围内,其中根系与剪切方向夹角为45°时实测值接近模型计算最大值,夹角为90°时实测值接近模型计算极限值的平均值。与Wu模型计算值相比,估算模型精度平均提高了5倍。模型参数敏感性分析表明,根系提供的土体附加强度受根系数量参数、尺寸参数及界面黏结强度参数的影响较大。

关键词: 含根土, 根-土界面黏结强度, 抗剪强度, 力学模型

Abstract: At present, the quantitative evaluation models of mechanical reinforcement of soil by roots lack consideration of root-soil interface bonding effect. In order to improve the accuracy and applicability of the quantitative model, this study was premised on the widely used Wu model, combined with the failure mode of root system in root-soil, and quantified the bonding effect of interface between root and soil interface by interface bonding strength parameters. Thus, an estimation model of limit values of shear strength of root-bearing soil based on interface bonding was established, which considered the influence of soil stress, root diameter, root length, and initial angle between root and shear direction in root-bearing soil. Furthermore, the comparison of shear strength of root-bearing soil between the measured values of direct shear test and the calculated values of the model showed that the measured values were within the range of the calculated values of the model established in this article. When the angle between the root and the shear direction was 45°, the measured value was close to the maximum value of the model calculation, and when the angle was 90°, the measured value was close to the average value of the limit values of the model calculation. Compared with the calculated value of Wu model, the accuracy of the estimation model established in this article was increased by five times on average. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis of model parameters showed that the additional soil strength provided by roots was greatly affected by the root number parameters, root size parameters and root-soil interface bond strength parameters.

Key words: root-bearing soil, root-soil interface bonding strength, shear strength, mechanical model

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[2] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[3] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[4] 胡伟, 曾攀煜, 王辉, 刘顺凯, 陈秋南, PUIG DAMIANS I, . 黏性土地基中水平条形锚板上拔承载力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1731-1744.
[5] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[6] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[7] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[8] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[9] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[10] 王军, 张凯宇, 陈晟凯, 秦伟, 倪俊峰, 高紫阳, 张一帆, . 爆破挤淤法中炸药埋深对土体参数影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 123-132.
[11] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[12] 张雅琴, 杨平, 张婷, 韩琳亮. 含盐量及冻融条件对冻融氯盐粉质黏土静动强度特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 157-166.
[13] 张化进, 吴顺川, 李兵磊, 赵宇松, . 基于高斯过程回归的岩石抗剪强度参数不确定性估测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 415-423.
[14] 朱俊宇, 裴利华, 桂跃, . 含有机质土抗剪强度再认识——基于土壤有机质赋存形态的认知[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 451-460.
[15] 冉宇玲, 张文博, 柏巍, 孔令伟, 周丽娜, 樊恒辉, . 基于孔内剪切试验的游离氧化铁对红黏土抗剪强度影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2573-2582.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!