岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 2611-2621.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0358

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

原状黄土−古土壤中水分入渗过程研究

赵志强1,戴福初1,闵弘2,谭晔1   

  1. 1. 北京工业大学 城市建设学部,北京 100124;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-11 修回日期:2021-04-26 出版日期:2021-09-10 发布日期:2021-08-31
  • 通讯作者: 戴福初,男,1967年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程与地质灾害研究。E-mail: daifc@bjut.edu.cn E-mail:zhaozhiqiang6733@163.com
  • 作者简介:赵志强,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事灌溉作用下黄土滑坡诱发机制研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大项目(No.41790440)。

Research on infiltration process in undisturbed loess-paleosol sequence

ZHAO Zhi-qiang1, DAI Fu-chu1, MIN Hong2, TAN Ye1   

  1. 1. Faculty of Architecture, Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2021-03-11 Revised:2021-04-26 Online:2021-09-10 Published:2021-08-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was funded by the Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(41790440).

摘要: 黄土塬区的农业灌溉致使地下水位不断升高,诱发了一系列黄土滑坡灾害。为探究灌溉水在黄土中的入渗过程,在陕西泾阳南塬开展了场地直径为20 m的原位浸水试验,监测得到了土体含水率和基质吸力的时空变化特征,并通过数值计算分析了浸水及间歇灌溉时水分的入渗规律。研究表明:塬边黄土的浸水入渗过程可分为均匀入渗、优势入渗和稳定入渗3个阶段,马兰黄土中存在竖向裂隙,当裂隙宽度大于2 mm且裂隙上部土体饱和后产生优势入渗;古土壤(S1)下部透水性较上部弱,湿润峰抵达S1下部时水分聚集而产生瞬态滞水;三维入渗数值计算再现了浸水入渗过程,多次灌溉条件下湿润锋的叠加效应促进水分入渗,且入渗强度随深度增加而减小,深度大于5.6 m时,水分入渗速率小于土体渗透系数,水分仅受重力下渗而含水率和基质吸力近似不变,这一发现解释了以往研究中深部黄土的水分入渗很难被监测到的现象。

关键词: 黄土, 现场监测, 灌溉入渗, 含水率, 基质吸力

Abstract: Agricultural irrigation in loess platform has led to a continuous rise of the groundwater level and triggered a series of loess landslides. To gain a better understanding of the infiltration behavior of irrigation water in loess, a field infiltration test with a diameter of 20 m was conducted on the South Jingyang tableland, Shaanxi province. The spatiotemporal characteristics of moisture content and matric suction were monitored. Then the infiltration laws under the conditions of soaking and intermittent irrigation were simulated. Results show that the soak infiltration can be divided into three stages, namely, uniform infiltration, preferential flow infiltration, and stable infiltration, respectively. Preferential flow associated with the vertical cracks in the Malan loess was observed when the width of the crack was more than 2 mm and the soil above the crack was saturated. The hydraulic conductivity of the lower part of paleosol layer (S1) was relatively weak compared to the upper part of S1, and a transient perched water was observed above the lower part of S1. The three-dimensional infiltration numerical model was established to reappear the soak infiltration process. Due to the multiple irrigation events, the downward percolation of water was significantly promoted by the superposition effect of wetting front. The infiltration capacity decreased with the increase of depth. The velocity of infiltration below 5.6 m depth was less than the hydraulic conductivity of the soil, the infiltration was driven solely by the gravity, and the moisture content and matric suction were almost unchanged. This finding explains the phenomenon that water infiltration in deep loess is difficult to be monitored in the previous studies.

Key words: loess, field monitoring, irrigation infiltration, moisture content, matric suction

中图分类号: TU444
[1] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[2] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[3] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[4] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[5] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[6] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[7] 鄂天龙, 崔强, 孙志亮, 冯杨州, 李冰臻, 缪栋, 杨健, 苗田, . 新型短柱斜桩复合基础结构优化与承载机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[8] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[9] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[10] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[11] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[12] 亢佳伟, 邓国华, 李开超, 王丽琴, . 基于原位浸水试验的黄土软化力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1851-1864.
[13] 李林, 张等红, 张淼, 顾晓强, 徐龙飞, . 考虑水-力耦合的桩-非饱和黄土接触面荷载传递模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1343-1355.
[14] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[15] 包卫星, 田磊, 吴谦, 黄志明, 张智勇. 伊犁黄土水分入渗特征及其对湿陷变形的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1379-1391.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!