岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 2634-2646.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0577

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

氯氧镁水泥固化淤泥力学特性应变速率效应研究

王东星1, 2, 3,陈政光1, 2   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072;2. 武汉大学 岩土与结构工程安全湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 3. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-16 修回日期:2021-06-24 出版日期:2021-10-11 发布日期:2021-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 陈政光,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事固化材料研发和淤泥处置等环境岩土方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhengguang-chen@whu.edu.cn E-mail:dongxing-wang@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王东星,男,1984年生,博士(后),教授,博士生导师,主要从事淤泥固化、软基处理等环境岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51879202,No. 52079098)

Strain rate effect on mechanical properties of magnesium oxychloride cement solidified sludge

WANG Dong-xing1, 2, 3, CHEN Zheng-guang1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2021-04-16 Revised:2021-06-24 Online:2021-10-11 Published:2021-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51879202, 52079098).

摘要: 对氯氧镁水泥(MOC)固化淤泥进行无侧限压缩与间接拉伸试验,研究养护龄期、延迟压实对试样强度与刚度的影响,分析恒定多应变速率加载和交替应变速率加载下固化淤泥的应变速率效应。结果表明,应变速率增加,纯淤泥的拉压强度、弹性模量、破坏应变与总应变能均随之增加。MOC固化淤泥抗压强度、抗拉强度及其总应变能随应变速率增加呈增加趋势,而弹性模量和破坏应变受应变速率影响较弱。应变速率越快,试样破裂面越扭曲且崎岖不平。养护龄期延长,MOC固化淤泥抗压强度及总压缩应变能显著增加,而抗拉强度及总拉伸应变能略有减少,不同计算方法下龄期对应变速率敏感性的影响不同。延迟压实会折减固化淤泥的拉压强度、弹性模量和总应变能,降低应变速率敏感性。应变速率突变产生的应力跳跃随应力增大而增加,随应变增大先增加后持平。速率敏感性系数结果表明,固化淤泥的速率敏感性低于纯淤泥,劈裂抗拉强度对应变速率变化的敏感性大于无侧限抗压强度。该研究结果可为固化淤泥材料应变速率效应分析提供理论参考。

关键词: 淤泥, 氯氧镁水泥(MOC), 固化, 应变速率

Abstract: Series of unconfined compression and indirect tensile tests were performed to study the effects of curing age and delayed compaction on strength and stiffness of magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC) solidified sludge, analyzing the strain rate effect of solidified sludge under constant multi-strain rate loading and alternative strain rate loading. The obtained results indicate that the tensile strength, compressive strength, elastic modulus, failure strain, and total strain energy of sludge increase with an increased strain rate. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and total strain energy of MOC solidified sludge has an upward trend with strain rate, while the elastic modulus and failure strain have no apparent change. The faster the strain rate is, the more distorted and rugged the fracture surface is. With the prolongation of curing age, the compressive strength and total compressive strain energy are significantly increased, while the tensile strength and total tensile strain energy are reduced slightly. Significantly, different calculation methods adopted would result in different strain rate sensitivity coefficients for curing age. The delayed compaction would reduce the tensile strength, compressive strength, elastic modulus, total strain energy, and strain rate sensitivity coefficient of solidified sludge. The stress jump induced by a sudden change of strain rate is enlarged owing to the increase of applied stress, and it first increases and then levels off as the strain is extended. The strain rate sensitivity coefficient shows that solidified sludge is less sensitive than pure sludge, and the tensile strength is more sensitive than the compressive strength. The obtained results can provide an essential theoretical reference for the strain rate effect analysis of solidified sludge.

Key words: sludge, magnesium oxychloride cement (MOC), solidification, strain rate

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[3] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[4] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[5] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[6] 谈云志, 吴仙桥, 吴军, 明华军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 磷石膏基团粒调控固化淤泥的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[7] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[8] 吴林玉, 缪林昌, 孙潇昊, . 聚丙烯酰胺对酶诱导碳酸盐沉淀固沙效果影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1573-1580.
[9] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[10] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[11] 蒋新彧, 征西遥, 吴俊, 杨爱武, 李博, . HNO3和H2SO4侵蚀作用下地质聚合物固化软土的抗酸性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 851-866.
[12] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[13] 赖汉江, 刘润明, 陈志波, 崔明娟, . 粒径效应对大豆粗脲酶固化砂土效果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 25-32.
[14] 李爽, 李江山, 张平, 刘磊, 杜月林, 朱磊, 高腾飞, 陈亿军, . 垃圾腐殖土固化回填可行性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 84-94.
[15] 张荣, 卢正, 刘杰, 赵阳, 冯一诺, . 矿渣+粉煤灰+聚丙烯酰胺固化硫酸盐渍土的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 123-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!