岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3291-3300.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0567

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

厦门花岗岩残积土的压缩变形特性及其微观机制

王港1, 2,张先伟1,刘新宇1, 2,徐倚晴1, 2,芦剑锋1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 修回日期:2021-08-13 出版日期:2021-12-13 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 张先伟,男,1982年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事特殊土土力学基础研究及工程应用方面的研究。E-mail: xwzhang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:wanggang191@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:王港,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土土力学等方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41972285,No.41672293);中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(No.2018363);湖北省杰出青年科学基金(No.2020CFA103);长江科学院开放研究基金(No.CKWV2021884/KY)。

Compression characteristics and microscopic mechanism of Xiamen granite residual soil

WANG Gang1, 2, ZHANG Xian-wei1, LIU Xin-yu1, 2, XU Yi-qing1, 2, LU Jian-feng1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Revised:2021-08-13 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41972285, 41672293), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2018363), the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province (2020CFA103) and CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2021884/KY).

摘要: 研究花岗岩残积土压缩变形过程中微观结构的演化规律,对于深入理解风化土的变形机制、结构特性对其力学性质的影响,建立微观结构特征与宏观力学行为的联系均有重要意义。对厦门花岗岩残积土原状样与重塑样进行了一维压缩试验,对不同荷载作用下的试样进行扫描电子显微镜测试,提取表征颗粒团聚体与孔隙的体积、形状与定向性等微观结构参数,对比分析这些微观结构参数在压缩变形过程中变化的规律,提出了花岗岩残积土的压缩变形机制。结果表明:厦门花岗岩残积土具有明显的胶结效果,压缩曲线呈现明显的弯点,当荷载超过拟先期固结压力后,压缩曲线逐渐向固有压缩曲线(ICL)靠近;原状土的压缩变形主要由大孔隙压缩引起,而重塑土是大、中孔隙向小孔隙转化;原状土的颗粒团聚体具有相对较差的圆度,随着压缩变形逐渐增大,颗粒团聚体形状向偏圆形发展;压缩变形会引起颗粒团聚体向垂直于加载应力方向偏转,造成颗粒团聚体定向性增加。花岗岩残积土的压缩变形机制可归结为微观结构的不断自我调整以趋达到稳定有序状态。该研究可为我国南方地区的花岗岩残积土的基础变形分析提供理论支撑。

关键词: 花岗岩残积土, 压缩, 微观结构, 定向性, 孔隙, 胶结

Abstract: Study on the microstructural change of granite residual soils (GRS) during compression is important to comprehend the influence of deformation mechanism and structure characteristics on soil mechanical characteristics and to establish relations between macroscopic behavior and microstructural characteristics of weathered soils. One-dimension compression tests were conducted on Xiamen GRS and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to investigate samples under different loading conditions. Structural parameters enabling the quantification of particle assemblage and pore volume, morphologies and preferred orientations of GRS were gained. This study investigated these parameters during compression procedures, then the mechanisms of compression deformation were proposed. The results indicate that the effects of cementation played an important role on GRS. The compression curve showed an obvious turning point and approached ICL gradually after the load exceeding the pre-consolidation pressure. The compression of large pores contributed to deformation of natural soils, while deformation of reconstituted soils was mainly dependent on the transformation from large pores and meso pores to small pores. Particle assemblages of natural soils showed relatively low roundness value, while after one-dimension compression test, the particle assemblage shape showed remarkable tendency towards medium roundness. Compression deformation resulted in deflection of particle assemblages perpendicular to loading, facilitating the preferred orientation. The deformation mechanism of GRS is that the microstructure constantly rearranges and reorients into a more stable and orderly structure. The research provides theoretical support for foundation deformation analysis related to GRS.

Key words: granite residual soil, compression, microstructure, preferred orientation, pore, cementation

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[2] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[3] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[4] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[5] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[6] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[7] 蔡玉娟, 蔡静森, 任少文, 刘锴, 陈劲, 李漪, . 岩溶区非均质岩组岩体力学参数快速估计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2749-2762.
[8] 刘先珊, 孙梦, 郑志伟, 熊振瑀, 于明智, 曹伊婷, 宋昱霖, 黄子宣, . 复杂孔隙介质两相驱替模式及驱替效率研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2363-2375.
[9] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[10] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[11] 谈云志, 吴仙桥, 吴军, 明华军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 磷石膏基团粒调控固化淤泥的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[12] 吴婷, 杨志兵, 胡冉, 陈益峰, . 细颗粒运移与孔隙堵塞对两相渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1755-1764.
[13] 陈一纬, 董平川, . 饱和各向异性裂缝型岩石中波的频散和衰减[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1934-1942.
[14] 彭潇, 周剑, 张路青, 杨志法, 周唐富, 林雅苗, 杨多兴, . 实时高温和自然冷却条件下石英岩热损伤特征对比模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1943-1956.
[15] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!