岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 37-50.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0765

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞 破坏机制模型试验

周光新1, 2,盛谦1, 2,崔臻1, 2,王天强3,马亚丽娜4,付兴伟5   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;4. 中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430056; 5. 中国长江三峡集团有限公司,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-23 修回日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-06
  • 通讯作者: 崔臻,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程抗震安全方面的研究。E-mail: zcui@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:zhouguangxin95@163.com
  • 作者简介:周光新,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事隧道与地下工程方面研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51779253,No. 52079133);深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室开放基金课题(No. SKLGDUEK1912);长江科学院开放研究基金资助项目(No. CKWV2019746/KY);暨南大学“重大工程灾害与控制”教育部重点实验室开放基金课题(No. 20200904002)。

Model test of failure mechanism of tunnel with flexible joint crossing active fault under strike-slip fault dislocation

ZHOU Guang-xin1, 2, SHENG Qian1, 2, CUI Zhen1, 2, WANG Tian-qiang3, MA Ya-li-na4, FU Xing-wei5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 4. CCCC Second Highway Consultant Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China; 5. China Three Gorges Corporation,Beijing 100038,China
  • Received:2021-05-23 Revised:2021-09-13 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51779253, 52079133), the Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (SKLGDUEK1912), CRSRI Open Research Program (CKWV2019746/KY) and the MOE Key Laboratory of Major Disaster Forecast and Control in Engineering, Jinan University (20200904002).

摘要: 以滇中引水香炉山隧洞为背景工程,通过小尺度物理模型试验,对断层错动模拟过程中的隧洞上覆围岩破裂形态、衬砌破坏形态和裂纹发展、应变分布特征等关键响应特征开展试验分析,深入地研究了走滑断层错动影响下跨活断层铰接隧洞的破坏形式及破坏机制。在铰接隧洞抗错断设计参数作用机制方面,详细研究了衬砌节段长度、衬砌厚度、隧洞直径、隧洞轴线与断层带夹角、隧洞断面形式,衬砌材料力学特性等因素对铰接设计隧洞抗断性能的影响。研究结果表明:(1)当跨活断层隧洞不采用铰接设计时,在断层错动作用下隧洞破坏模式为剪切和弯曲组合破坏,衬砌破坏程度严重,存在剥离脱落现象。隧洞截面呈现椭圆化变形,整体坍塌趋势明显;在当前试验中,无铰接隧洞破坏范围达4Wf (Wf为断层带的宽度)。 (2)当跨活断层隧洞采用铰接设计时,在断层错动作用下隧洞整体变形呈现S形,衬砌结构破坏形式为节段间的转动和错台,衬砌节段相对完整,破坏程度较轻;当前试验中,铰接隧洞破坏范围为2.14Wf,相较于无铰接隧洞减少48%,表明铰接设计可改变活断层错断作用下隧洞的变形破坏模式,并减小隧洞结构的损伤范围。(3)铰接设计条件下,隧洞衬砌结构应变峰值主要分布在断层带内,隧洞易发生屈服破坏;与无铰接隧洞相比,铰接隧洞左右边墙纵向最大拉应变减少了56%,纵向最大压应变减少了68%,进一步表明铰接设计可以有效提高隧洞的抗错断性能。(4)在铰接隧洞抗错断设计参数作用机制方面,研究表明增加衬砌厚度、增加衬砌混凝土强度等级、减小节段长度、减小隧洞直径均可提高铰接隧洞的抗错断性能,隧洞穿越断层带的最佳角度为正交,圆形断面相较于三心圆断面可提升铰接隧洞的抗断能力。综上所述,研究成果可以为跨活断裂隧洞工程抗错断措施提供必要的理论参考和技术支持。

关键词: 隧洞工程, 走滑断层, 模型试验, 破坏形式, 铰接设计

Abstract: Based on the fault crossing situation of Xianglushan tunnel of water diversion project, we conducted systematic monitoring and analysis of key mechanical characteristics of tunnel such as surrounding rock rupture pattern, lining damage pattern and crack development, strain distribution characteristics during faults dislocation simulation through indoor physical model tests, and thoroughly studied the damage form and failure mechanism of tunnel with flexible joint crossing active faults under strike-slip fault dislocation. In terms of the mechanism of the design parameters of the flexible joint tunnel to resist faulting, the effects of factors such as liner section length, liner thickness, tunnel diameter, angle between tunnel axis and fault zone, tunnel section form, and mechanical properties of liner materials on the fracture resistance of the flexible joint tunnels were studied in detail. The results of the study show: 1) When the tunnel crossing the active fault is not articulated, the damage pattern presents a combination of shear and bending damage under the fault dislocation, and the lining damage is severe with a phenomenon of peeling off. The tunnel section shows elliptical deformation, and the overall collapse trend is obvious. The damage range of non-articulated tunnel reaches 4Wf (Wf is the width of the fault zone) in this scenario. 2) When the articulated design is adopted in the tunnel crossing the active fault, the deformation of the tunnel shows S-shape under the fault misalignment. The damage of the lining structure is in the form of inter-segment rotation and misalignment, while the lining segments are relatively intact and less damaged. The damage range of the flexible joint tunnel in this scenario is 2.14Wf, which is 48% less than that of the non-flexible joint tunnel, indicating that the articulated design can change the deformation and damage of the tunnel under the active fault dislocation and reduce the damage range of the tunnel structure. 3) Under the condition of articulated design, the maximum strain of the tunnel lining structure is mainly distributed in the fault zone, and the tunnel is prone to yield failure. Compared with the non-flexible joint tunnel, the maximum longitudinal tensile strain and compressive strain in the left and right side walls of the flexible joint tunnel are reduced by 56% and 68% respectively, which further indicates that the articulated design can effectively improve the tunnel’s resistance to fault dislocation. 4) In terms of the mechanism of the design parameters of the articulated tunnel, this paper concludes that the resistance performance of articulated tunnel can be enhanced by increasing the tunnel lining thickness, increasing the concrete strength level of the lining, reducing the length of the section and reducing the diameter of the tunnel. The optimal angle of the tunnel through the fault zone is orthogonal, and the circular section can improve the resistance of the flexible joint tunnel compared with the three-centered circular section. In summary, the research results can provide necessary theoretical reference and technical supports for the anti-faulting measures of cross-active fracture tunnel projects.

Key words: tunnel engineering, strike slip fault, model test, failure pattern, articulated design

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[7] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[8] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[10] 王滢, 刘嘉怡, 高盟, 孔祥霄, . 地震作用下深海含气能源土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 457-466.
[11] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[15] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!