岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 489-498.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0132

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冻融循环对二灰和改性聚乙烯醇 固化盐渍土力学性能的影响

李敏1,于禾苗1,杜红普2,曹保宇1,柴寿喜3   

  1. 1. 河北工业大学 土木与交通学院,天津 300401;2. 中国广电河南网络有限公司,河南 郑州450046; 3. 天津城建大学 地质与测绘学院,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-10 修回日期:2021-12-06 出版日期:2022-02-11 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 作者简介:李敏,女,1985年生,博士,教授,主要从事污染土的处置研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51978235);河北省自然科学基金(No. E2018202274);河北省科技创新战略基金(No. 20180602)。

Mechanical properties of saline soil solidified with the mixture of lime, fly ash and modified polyvinyl alcohol under freeze-thaw cycles

LI Min1, YU He-miao1, DU Hong-pu2, CAO Bao-yu1, CHAI Shou-xi3   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 2. Radio and Television Henan Network Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China; 3. School of Geology and Geomatics, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2021-08-10 Revised:2021-12-06 Online:2022-02-11 Published:2022-02-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978235), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2018202274) and the Technology Innovation Strategy Foundation of Hebei Province (20180602).

摘要: 随季节性变化的冻融循环作用对土体结构有显著的影响。为降低盐渍土对环境温度的敏感性并将其应用于工程中,提出以石灰、粉煤灰和改性聚乙烯醇(MPA)为固化材料的联合固化方法。先通过无侧限抗压强度(UCS)和微观扫描试验评价固化效果,构建固化材料的参数范围,再将抗剪强度(黏聚力和内摩擦角)与正交试验相结合,分析各因素的影响,明确最佳组合参数。结果表明:石灰+粉煤灰+MPA联合固化有助于提高盐渍土的强度,联合固化盐渍土的UCS为1 130.25 kPa,是盐渍土(218 kPa)的5.18倍;联合固化盐渍土的冻融强度满足工程规范(JTG 3430-2020)要求。冻融循环作用下联合固化盐渍土的UCS稳定值为700 kPa,且3次循环后的波动范围在5%左右。适宜配比下联合固化盐渍土的抗剪强度(黏聚力和内摩擦角)在3次冻融循环后为208.2 kPa和38.56°。各因素的敏感性由高到低依次为养护时间、石灰掺量、MPA掺量、干密度、含盐量和冻融循环次数,随石灰、粉煤灰和MPA掺量的增加,联合固化盐渍土强度增大并趋于稳定,固化参数的优化可有效弱化冻融作用对滨海盐渍土的影响。结合抗压及抗剪强度试验结果,建议固化参数的最佳组合为石灰掺量14%、粉煤灰掺量30%、MPA掺量1%、养护时间28 d、干密度1.65 g/cm3。

关键词: 力学性能, 冻融性能, 联合固化, 抗压强度, 抗剪强度, 微观结构, 盐渍土

Abstract: The repeated freeze-thaw cycles with seasonal alternations have an obvious effect on soil structure. To reduce the sensitivity of saline soil to temperature and then use it in engineering, a combined treatment method is proposed, where lime, fly ash and modified polyvinyl alcohol (MPA) are used as solidified materials. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and microstructure characterization tests are firstly used to evaluate the solidified effect and obtain the parameters scope of solidified materials. Then the tests of shear strength (cohesion and internal friction angle) and the orthogonal experiment are used to analyze the influence of each factor, and then obtained the optimal combination of solidified parameters. The results indicate that the combination of lime, fly ash and MPA can improve the strength of saline soil. After combined treatment, the UCS is 1 130.25 kPa, which is 5.18 times than that of saline soil (218 kPa). The strength of combined solidified saline soil meets the requirements of engineering specification (JTG 3430-2020). The stable value of UCS of combined solidified saline soil under freeze-thaw cycles is 700 kPa. The fluctuation is about 5% after three freeze-thaw cycles. The cohesion and the internal friction angle of combined solidified saline under the most appropriate ratio can be 208.2 kPa and 38.56°, respectively after three freezing-thawing cycles. The sensitivity ranking of the factors is as follows: curing time, lime content, MPA content, dry density, salt content, and times of freeze-thaw cycles. With an increase in lime, fly ash and MPA content, the strength of combined solidified saline soil increases and then tends to become stable. The optimization of solidification parameters can effectively weaken the influence of freeze-thaw on coastal saline soil. Based on tests results of compressive strength and shear strength, it can be concluded that the optimal combination of solidified parameters is 14% of lime, 30% of fly ash, 1% of MPA, 28 days of curing time, and a dry density of 1.65 g/cm3.

Key words: mechanical property, freeze-thaw performance, combined solidified method, compressive strength, shear strength, microstructure, saline soil

中图分类号: TU 448
[1] 郅彬, 魏园钧, 王番, 张茜, 刘存利, 任会明, . 冻融循环作用下含Na2SO4盐原状黄土宏观强度与微观结构关联机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 106-120.
[2] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[3] 张春瑞, 纪洪广, 付桢, 张月征, 宋宇, 田竹华, 范文博, . 白云石对粉砂岩物理力学性质影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2661-2675.
[4] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[5] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[6] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[8] 倪祖甲, 乔江美, 张俊楷, 唐旭海, . 基于微观岩石力学试验及精确矿物晶体建模的砂岩力学性质及波速分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1865-1880.
[9] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[10] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[11] 佘磊, 赵阳, 李炎隆, 李东锋, 宋卿, 郑继光, 陈晨, . 基于隧道掘进机掘进参数的现场岩体力学参数快速估计方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1595-1604.
[12] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[13] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[14] 崔雯雯, 董晓强, 刘晓勇, 赵睿阳, 贺高乐, 张蒙, 周磊, 武学文, . 赤泥基胶凝材料的水化动力学过程及其水化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 867-880.
[15] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!