岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 891-900.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0843

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

化学改性联合真空预压法加固吹填土试验分析

雷华阳1, 2,王磊1,刘景锦1, 2,王鹏3,章纬地1,薄钰1   

  1. 1. 天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300350;2. 天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300350; 3. 天津市市政工程设计研究总院,天津 300392
  • 收稿日期:2021-06-04 修回日期:2021-11-10 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 作者简介:雷华阳,女,1974年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52078334)

Experimental analysis of chemical modification combined with vacuum preloading method for reinforcing dredger fill

LEI Hua-yang1, 2, WANG Lei1, LIU Jing-jin1, 2, WANG Peng3, ZHANG Wei-di1, BO Yu1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China; 3. Tianjin Manucipal Engineering Design and Research Institute, Tianjin 300392, China
  • Received:2021-06-04 Revised:2021-11-10 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (52078334).

摘要: 通过开展室内真空预压模型试验和微观测试,针对黏粒含量较高的吹填土,探讨分析了化学改性联合真空预压法的加固效果及其机制。结果显示:经过化学改性后,吹填土的液限及塑性指数显著降低,渗透系数明显增大;此外,微观测试结果显示,经过化学改性后,改性外掺剂与吹填土颗粒间发生复杂的化学反应,吹填土颗粒表面附着大量的难溶物,使其表现为典型的团粒结构,孔隙直径明显增大,土体的渗透性显著提高;与常规真空预压法相比,化学改性联合真空预压法处理吹填土的加固效果得到大幅度的提升,其中排水量最大提升幅度达17.6%,表层沉降量明显增大,加固后土体十字板剪切强度最大提高69.0%。该研究为改进真空预压法的技术发展提供了理论依据。

关键词: 真空预压, 化学改性, 模型试验, 加固效果, 机制分析

Abstract: Aiming at the dredger fill with high clay content, a series of vacuum preloading model tests and microscopic tests were carried out in this study, to discuss the reinforcement effect and mechanism of the chemical modification combined with vacuum preloading method. The results show that the liquid limit and plasticity index of the dredger fill were both reduced notably, while the coefficient of permeability of the dredger fill was significantly increased; in addition, the microscopic tests results show that a series of complex chemical reactions happened between modified admixture and soil particles due to chemical modification, and it can be observed that a large amount of insoluble substance was attached to the surface of the dredger fill particles due to the chemical modification, which contributed to a typical aggregate structure and increasing the pore diameter, and leading to a significant improvement in the permeability of the dredger fill. Compared with traditional vacuum preloading method, the chemical modification combined with vacuum preloading method has greatly improved the reinforcement effect of the dredger fill. The maximum increases in vacuum preloading drainage and vane shear strength of the dredger fill reinforced were 17.6% and 69.0%, and the surface settlement increased significantly. This research provides a theoretical basis for improving the technical development of vacuum preloading method.

Key words: vacuum preloading, chemical modification, model test, reinforcement effect, mechanism analysis

中图分类号: O 319.56
[1] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[2] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[3] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[6] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[7] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[8] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[9] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[10] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[11] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[12] 裴媛媛, 龙建辉, 郭师苡, 安成纪, 翁杭雨, 张吉宁, . 不同荷载作用下折角式加筋土挡墙应力-应变特征模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[13] 吴学震, 夏亚歆, 李大勇, 游先辉, 单宁康, 肖贞科, 陈祥, . 新型劲性水泥土组合桩内界面抗剪强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 467-478.
[14] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[15] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!