岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 969-980.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1123

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑软弱夹层厚度的岩体力学响应及破坏特征研究

赵宏刚1, 2,张东明1, 2,蒋长宝1, 2,余北辰1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 煤矿灾害动力学与控制国家重点实验室,重庆 400030;2. 重庆大学 资源与安全学院,重庆 400030
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-22 修回日期:2021-10-06 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 张东明,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩石力学和冲击地压等方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhangdm@cqu.edu.cn E-mail: hg.zhao@cqu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵宏刚,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事矿山岩石力学、煤与瓦斯共采等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51874053,No. 51674048)。

Mechanical response and failure characteristics of rock mass considering the thickness of weak interlayer

ZHAO Hong-gang1, 2, ZHANG Dong-ming1, 2, JIANG Chang-bao1, 2, YU Bei-chen1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China; 2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
  • Received:2021-07-22 Revised:2021-10-06 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (51874053, 51674048).

摘要: 作为一种典型的地质结构,软弱夹层与硬脆性岩体共同形成了围岩层状复合结构,进而显著影响着隧洞围岩的稳定。以往对含软弱夹层的复合岩石的研究多集中于单轴、双轴或常规三轴,对隧洞临空面处真三轴应力路径下的复合围岩力学性质和破坏特征缺乏分析讨论。通过制作的含不同厚度的软弱夹层复合岩样,探讨了软弱夹层厚度对隧洞临空面围岩力学响应和破坏特征的影响。研究表明:软弱夹层厚度显著影响着复合岩样峰值应力和应变,随着厚度的增大,软弱夹层上方岩块向临空面方向的滑移变形逐渐增大,软弱夹层压缩变形逐渐减小;复合岩样靠近临空面的岩石单元破坏模式随着软弱夹层厚度的增大逐渐由拉剪混合破坏转变为张拉破坏,且宏观裂隙数量和破坏范围均逐渐减小,而远离临空面的岩石单元则由剪切破坏逐渐转变为基本无损伤断裂;不同厚度的隧洞侧帮复合围岩的破坏区域均集中在软弱夹层及其上方围岩处,软弱夹层下方围岩则基本保持稳定;在应力分布方面,软弱夹层厚度越大,最大压应力越向深部软弱夹层处转移,而拉应力区分布范围越小,但拉应力区深度越大。

关键词: 软弱夹层, 滑移变形, 拉剪混合破坏, 最大压应力, 拉应力

Abstract: As a typical geological structure, the layered composite structure of surrounding rock is formed by weak interlayer and hard brittle rock, and it significantly affects the stability of tunnel surrounding rock. In the past, the research on composite rock with weak interlayer focused on uniaxial, biaxial or conventional triaxial stress paths, and the mechanical properties and failure characteristics of composite rock at the free face of tunnel under true triaxial stress path were lack of analysis and discussion. In this study, the influence of the thickness of weak interlayer on the mechanical response and failure characteristics of surrounding rock at the free face is discussed based on the composite rock samples with different thicknesses of weak interlayer. The results show that: (1) The thickness of weak interlayer significantly affects the peak stress and strain of composite rock samples. With the increase of thickness, the sliding deformation of rock blocks above the weak interlayer gradually increases, and the compression deformation of the weak interlayer decreases gradually. (2) With the increase of thickness of the weak interlayer, the failure mode of the rock element near the free face of the composite rock sample gradually changes from mixed tension shear failure to tension failure, and the number and failure range of macro cracks gradually decrease, while the rock element far away from the free face gradually changes from shear failure to basically undamaged fracture. (3) The failure areas of composite surrounding rock of side wall with different thicknesses are concentrated on the weak interlayer and the surrounding rock above it, while the surrounding rock below the weak interlayer is basically stable. In terms of stress distribution, with the increase of thickness of the weak interlayer, the maximum compressive stress gradually transfers to the deep weak interlayer, and the tensile stress area gradually decreases, while the depth of the tensile stress area gradually increases.

Key words: weak interlayer, sliding deformation, mixed tension and shear failure, maximum compressive stress, tensile stress

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[2] 曹建军, 胡斌, 王泽祺, 李京, . 基于分数阶积分的软弱夹层蠕变损伤模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 454-464.
[3] 刘啸, 张晓君, 魏金祝, 何俊玲, 王靖涛, . 循环加卸载下直墙拱形巷(隧)道应力松弛特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 476-484.
[4] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[5] 郭明珠, 谷坤生, 张合, 孙海龙, 王晨, 刘晃, . 强震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1306-1316.
[6] 刘汉香, 许 强, 朱 星, 周小棚, 刘文德. 含软弱夹层斜坡地震动力响应过程 的边际谱特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1387-1396.
[7] 朱赛楠, 殷跃平, 李 滨, . 二叠系炭质页岩软弱夹层剪切蠕变特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1377-1386.
[8] 陈 宾,周乐意,赵延林,王智超,晁代杰,贾古宁,. 干湿循环条件下红砂岩软弱夹层微结构与剪切强度的关联性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1633-1642.
[9] 姚 囝,叶义成,王其虎,岳 哲,罗斌玉,. 基于量纲分析的缓倾斜空区顶板稳定性的影响规律研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4232-4241.
[10] 范 刚,张建经,付 晓, . 含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡传递函数及其应用研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1052-1059.
[11] 周 飞 ,许 强 ,刘汉香 ,王 龙,. 地震作用下含水平软弱夹层斜坡动力响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 133-139.
[12] 殷 勇 ,周国庆,. 软弱夹层的极限荷载分析[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1035-1040.
[13] 张绪涛 ,张强勇 ,向 文 ,高 强 ,袁圣渤 ,王 超,. 深部层状节理岩体分区破裂模型试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2247-2254.
[14] 王浩然 ,黄茂松 ,刘怡林, . 含软弱夹层边坡的三维稳定性极限分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 156-160.
[15] 刘怡林 ,黄茂松 ,袁 伟 ,王浩然 , . 斜坡含软夹层地基路堤离心模型试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 22-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!