岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S1): 157-163.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1216

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀改性膨胀土试验研究

喻成成1, 2,卢正1, 3,姚海林1, 3,刘杰1, 3,詹永祥1, 3   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 环境岩土工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-16 修回日期:2021-03-09 出版日期:2022-06-30 发布日期:2022-07-13
  • 通讯作者: 卢正,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土与路基工程的研究工作。E-mail: lzwhrsm@163.com E-mail:yuchengcheng18@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:喻成成,男,1992年生,硕士研究生,主要从事路基工程的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42077262,No.42077261,No.41972294)。

Experimental study of modifying expansive soils using microbial induced calcite precipitation

YU Cheng-cheng1, 2, LU Zheng1, 3, YAO Hai-lin1, 3, LIU Jie1, 3, ZHAN Yong-xiang1, 3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Hubei Key Laboratory of Environmental Geotechnology, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2020-08-16 Revised:2021-03-09 Online:2022-06-30 Published:2022-07-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(42077262, 42077261, 41972294).

摘要: 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀(microbial induced calcite precipitation,简称MICP)技术可能是有助于解决膨胀土胀缩行为的一种潜在方法。用细菌浓度和脲酶活性作为控制指标,研究了在不同培养条件下的巴氏芽孢杆菌的生长特性,确定了最有利于细菌生长的温度、pH和摇床震荡速率。用MICP技术对两种不同的膨胀土进行处治,通过比较处治前后土样的自由膨胀率、无荷膨胀率、黏聚力、内摩擦角以及抗剪强度等物理力学指标,验证处治效果,从微观角度解释了改性膨胀土的作用机制。结果表明:培养温度为30 ℃、pH为7、摇床震荡速率为200 r/min时,最适宜细菌生长。MICP处治后的膨胀土自由膨胀率和无荷膨胀率均有明显下降,黏聚力、内摩擦角以及抗剪强度均有明显增强,MICP过程中生成的碳酸钙起到了孔隙填充和土颗粒胶结作用,同时钙离子对低价阳离子的置换和碳酸钙对土颗粒的包裹效应,共同作用改善了膨胀土特性。研究可为微生物处治膨胀土技术和工程应用提供参考。

关键词: 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀(MICP), 膨胀土, 膨胀率, 强度

Abstract: Microbial induced calcite precipitation (MICP) is a technique that can be a potential method to solve wetting swelling and drying shrinkage of expansive soils. With the bacteria concentration and urease activity as standards of measurement, the growth properties of Sporosarcina pasteurii in various conditions were studied, and the most favorable temperature, pH and vibration velocity were determined. Two different types of expansive soils were treated with MICP, and the effect of this method was studied by comparing expansive properties, cohesive force, internal friction angle and shear strength before and after the treatment. The mechanism of MICP treated expansive soils was explained through microstructure perspective. The results showed that the optimal culture conditions for the bacterial growth were as follows: the pH of 7, the vibration velocity of 200 r/min, and the temperature of 30 ℃. After treating with MICP, the free swelling ratio and unloaded swelling ratio were decreased significantly, while the cohesive force, internal friction angle and shear strength were increased. The calcium carbonate generated during MICP played the role of pore filling and soil particle cementation, and the replacement of low valence cations by calcium ions and the wrapping effect of calcium carbonate on soil particles improved the properties of expansive soils. The research can provide beneficial references for the technology and engineering applications of MICP treatment of expansive soils.

Key words: microbial induced calcite precipitation(MICP), expansive soil, swelling ratio, strength

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[2] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[3] 刘静, 王昊, 杨鑫, 苏进臣, 张友良, . 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固热带土质边坡现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 343-353.
[4] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[5] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[6] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[7] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[8] 李晓锋, 李海波, 刘黎旺, 傅帅旸, . 冲击荷载作用下岩石动态拉伸破坏特征及细观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2387-2398.
[9] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[10] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[11] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[12] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[13] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[14] 杨阳, 张程, 何想, 张建伟, 陈育民, 叶琳, 武发思, 张涵, . 活性生物泥诱导碳酸钙修复仿真文物砖可行性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1777-1787.
[15] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!