岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 1761-1771.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1657

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环作用下单裂隙炭质页岩能量演化与 破坏特征研究

刘新喜1,李玉1,范子坚1,李盛南2,王玮玮1,董蓬1   

  1. 1. 长沙理工大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114;2. 湖南工程学院 建筑工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411101
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-28 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-07-26 发布日期:2022-08-03
  • 通讯作者: 李玉,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体稳定性评价与控制方面研究。E-mail: 1986740197@qq.com E-mail: liuxinxi1963@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘新喜,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体稳定性方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51674041,No. 52108405);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(No. SJCX202025)。

Energy evolution and failure characteristics of single fissure carbonaceous shale under drying-wetting cycles

LIU Xin-xi1, LI Yu1, FAN Zi-jian1, LI Sheng-nan2, WANG Wei-wei1, DONG Peng1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, Hunan 411101, China
  • Received:2021-09-28 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51674041, 52108405) and the Research and Innovation Program for Postgraduates in Hunan Province (SJCX202025).

摘要: 为研究干湿循环作用下裂隙炭质页岩能量演化及破坏特征,分别制作完整和裂隙倾角为30°、45°和60°的炭质页岩,利用MTS815岩石力学试验系统进行不同干湿循环作用下的三轴压缩试验,研究了干湿循环对单裂隙炭质页岩强度、破坏模式及能量演化的影响。结果表明:起裂应力、损伤应力和峰值应力处弹性能和耗散能与干湿循环呈指数函数关系;起裂应力处弹性能、耗散能和损伤应力处耗散能对干湿循环的敏感程度较低,损伤应力处弹性能和峰值应力处弹性能、耗散能对干湿循环的敏感程度较高。炭质页岩破坏模式受控于干湿循环和裂隙倾角,干湿循环为主控因素,裂隙倾角为次控因素;裂隙倾角为30°的干燥岩样为拉剪破坏,裂隙倾角为45°和60°的干燥岩样为剪切破坏;随着干湿循环次数的增加,宏观主裂纹长度增大,次要裂纹增加,破坏模式整体上向剪拉破坏发展。随着干湿循环次数的增加,起裂应力处储能水平Kci和损伤应力处储能水平Kcd逐渐增大,起裂和损伤应力处储能水平越高,岩石起裂和损伤更容易;Kcd可作为岩石破坏的预警指标,Kcd越大,岩石越易发生破坏

关键词: 三轴压缩, 单裂隙炭质页岩, 干湿循环, 能量演化, 破坏特征

Abstract:

In order to investigate the energy evolution and failure characteristics of single fissure carbonaceous shale under drying-wetting cycles, intact and fissure carbonaceous shale samples with fissure angles of 30°, 45°and 60° were fabricated respectively. MTS815 rock mechanical test system was used to conduct triaxial compression tests under different drying-wetting cycles. The influence of drying-wetting cycles on the strength, failure mode and energy evolution of single fissure carbonaceous shale were studied. The results show that the elastic energy and dissipated energy at crack initiation stress, damage stress and peak stress present exponential relationships with drying-wetting cycles. The elastic energy and dissipated energy at crack initiation stress and dissipated energy at damage stress are less sensitive to drying-wetting cycle, while the sensitivities of elastic energy at damage stress, and elastic energy and dissipated energy at peak stress are relatively high. The failure mode of carbonaceous shale is dominated by drying-wetting cycle and fissure angle, in which the drying-wetting cycle is the main controlling factor, and the fissure angle is the secondary controlling factor. It is found that tensile shear failure occurs in dry rock sample with fissure angle of 30°, while the dry rock sample with fissure angle of 45°and 60° are subjected to shear failure. With the increase of the number of drying-wetting cycles, the macroscopic length of the main crack increases, the density of secondary cracks increases, and the failure mode transforms to shear-tension composite failure. With the increase of the number of drying-wetting cycles, the energy storage level at crack initiation stress Kci and the energy storage level at damage stress Kcd increase gradually. The higher the energy storage level at crack initiation and damage stress is, the more likely the crack initiation and rock damage occur. Kcd can be used as an warning indicator of rock failure. A larger Kcd indicates that the rock is more vulnerable to failure.

Key words: triaxial compression, single fissure carbonaceous shale, drying-wetting cycle, energy evolution, failure characteristics

中图分类号: TU 451
[1] 张培森, 王洪伟, 洪荒, 许大强, 陈增宝, 邓云驰, 梁展, 李金坤, 陈文豪, 崔乾, . 渗流-采动应力耦合作用下深部砂岩力学及能量演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1997-2010.
[2] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[3] 吴青钱, 石露, 李小春, 白冰, . 水/超临界CO2对低黏土含量砂岩力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1442-1454.
[4] 孟佳佳, 吴益平, 晏鄂川, 汪洋. 基于荷载-干湿循环耦合试验的三峡库区石龙门滑坡滑带土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1511-1520.
[5] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[6] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[7] 薛钦培, 陈宏信, 冯世进, 刘晓轩, 谢伟, . 干湿循环作用下地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 811-820.
[8] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[9] 蒋剑青, 罗敏华, 胡诗红, 柳志灏, . 断续节理产状对砂岩破坏特征影响的真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3077-3092.
[10] 王杰, 李冲, 刘磊, 丁阔, . 干湿循环下泥岩变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3132-3142.
[11] 杨科, 于祥, 何祥, 侯永强, 张连富, . 不同含水状态矸石胶结充填体能量演化与损伤特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 26-42.
[12] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[13] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[14] 程家林, 张贵科, 邓韶辉, 黄习文, 周伟, 马刚, . 干湿循环对不同粒径堆石颗粒破碎强度的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 95-105.
[15] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 基于声发射特征参数的砂岩节理直剪破坏特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 167-177.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!