岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2592-2601.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1265

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂支护条件下深基坑支护桩−冠梁−支撑 的变形协调及空间效应研究

莫品强1, 2, 3,刘尧2,黄子丰2,滕鸿博2,陈斌4,陶祥令5   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116; 3. 深圳市城市公共安全技术研究院,广东 深圳 518046;4. 中冶集团武汉勘察研究院有限公司,湖北 武汉 430080; 5. 江苏建筑职业技术学院 能源与交通工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-09 修回日期:2021-12-17 出版日期:2022-09-12 发布日期:2022-09-12
  • 作者简介:莫品强,男,1988年生,博士,副教授,博士生导师,主要从事土力学等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学青年基金(No.51908546,No.52178374);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(No.2020T130699);江苏省高校自然科学重大项目(No.20KJA560003)

Compatibility of deformation and spatial effects for retaining pile, crown beam and braces under complex retaining conditions of deep foundation pit

MO Pin-qiang1, 2, 3, LIU Yao2, HUANG Zi-feng2, TENG Hong-bo2, CHEN Bin4, TAO Xiang-ling5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou , Jiangsu 221116, China; 3. Shenzhen Urban Public Safety and Technology Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518046, China; 4. Wuhan Surveying-Geotechnical Research Institute Co., Ltd. of MCC, Wuhan, Hubei 430080, China; 4. College of Energy and Transportation Engineering, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Architectural Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2021-08-09 Revised:2021-12-17 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908546, 52178374), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020T130699) and the Natural Science Project of Jiangsu University (20KJA560003).

摘要: 针对深基坑复杂支护条件,基于弹性抗力法和结构力学力法建立了排桩挠曲线方程,提出了考虑支护桩-冠梁-支撑变形协调的计算方法,并编制了图形界面程序。对比分析工程实测数据,验证了所提方法的有效性。通过算例分析了冠梁和支撑的空间与尺寸效应在支护结构变形中的控制作用。研究结果表明,支护结构变形与冠梁和支撑的尺寸及空间布置具有明显的非线性相关关系。对于无腰撑的支护结构,冠梁最大位移随支撑间距的增大呈指数型增大,支护桩位移最大值发生在桩身1/3左右深处,随着支撑间距的增大而逐渐向桩顶偏移;当支撑刚度足够大时,增大支撑刚度限制支护结构变形效果不明显,且边跨冠梁的位移始终大于中跨;对于具体基坑工程,将冠梁截面宽度增大到一定宽度,能显著约束冠梁最大位移。

关键词: 深基坑, 排桩支护结构, 变形协调, 空间效应

Abstract: This paper aims to propose an analytical method for complex supporting problems of deep foundation pit using elastic resistance method and structure mechanical method, with considerations of compatibility of deformation and spatial effects for retaining pile, crown beam, and braces. Comparisons between calculation results and field data indicate the effectiveness of the proposed method, and further parametric study investigates the spatial and size effects of crown beam and braces on the deformation of retaining piles. Results show that the deformation of retaining structure is nonlinearly related to the dimensions and spatial distributions of crown beam and braces. For retaining structure without waist retaining, the maximum displacement of the crown beam increases exponentially with the brace spacing, and the maximum displacement of retaining pile occurs at a depth of about 1/3 of the pile length which gradually shifts to the pile top with the increase of brace spacing. The effect of increasing bracing stiffness to prevent the deformation of retaining structure is limited when the bracing stiffness is larger than a certain limit, and the displacement of crown beam in the side span is shown greater than that in the middle span. Increasing the sectional width of crown beam by certain significance could restrain the maximum displacement of the crown beam.

Key words: deep foundation pit, row-pile retaining structure, compatibility of deformation, spatial effects

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[2] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[3] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[4] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[5] 陈保国, 贾曾潘. 近接建筑荷载作用下阳角型深基坑最佳支撑位置[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2400-2408.
[6] HANIFAH Hermil Rizki, RAHARDJO Paulus Pramono, LIM Aswin. 砂土地层圆形深基坑三维分析与测斜仪测量[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1142-1152.
[7] 应宏伟, 熊一帆, 沈华伟, 魏锋, 李冰河, 吕唯, . 考虑圆孔不均匀收敛和空间效应的基坑坑外土体水平位移场分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3565-3576.
[8] 李瑛, 刘岸军, 刘兴旺. 考虑假想基础宽度的基坑抗隆起稳定性[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2843-2850.
[9] 董建华, 吴晓磊, 师利君, 于小燕, 何鹏飞, . 多年冻土区L型挡墙水平冻胀效应计算方法与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 879-890.
[10] 兰韡, 王卫东, 常林越, . 超大规模深基坑工程现场抽水试验及土层 变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2898-2910.
[11] 向伏林, 杨天亮, 顾凯, 施斌, 刘春, 刘苏平, 张诚成, 姜月华, . 钻孔全断面分布式光纤监测中光缆-土体变形协调性的离散元数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1743-1754.
[12] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[13] 王成汤, 王浩, 覃卫民, 钟国强, 陈舞, . 基于多态模糊贝叶斯网络的地铁车站 深基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1670-1679.
[14] 陈保国, 闫腾飞, 王程鹏, 宗秋雷, . 深基坑地连墙支护体系协调变形规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3289-3299.
[15] 谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土 承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!