岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (9): 2581-2591.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1936

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Pasternak地基模型的非线性土抗力−桩 身侧向位移曲线在基坑支护桩中的应用

朱彦鹏1, 2,吴林平1, 2,施多邦1, 2,赵壮福1, 2,吕向向1, 2,段新国1, 2   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730050; 2. 兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-16 修回日期:2022-05-06 出版日期:2022-09-12 发布日期:2022-09-12
  • 通讯作者: 吴林平,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事支挡结构方面的研究工作。E-mail: wlping0916@163.com E-mail:zhuyp1@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱彦鹏,男,1960年生,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事支挡结构、工程事故分析与处理等方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金面上项目(No.51978321)。

Application of nonlinear soil resistance-pile lateral displacement curve based on Pasternak foundation model in foundation pit retaining piles

ZHU Yan-peng1, 2, WU Lin-ping1, 2, SHI Duo-bang1, 2, ZHAO Zhuang-fu1, 2, LÜ Xiang-xiang1, 2, DUAN Xin-guo1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China
  • Received:2021-11-16 Revised:2022-05-06 Online:2022-09-12 Published:2022-09-12
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China(51978321).

摘要: 支护桩作为基坑开挖过程中的直接挡土结构,在水平荷载作用下,桩身的内力与变形情况对基坑工程的安全性和经济性影响较大。为了更准确地计算支护桩的内力与变形,依据桩−土相互作用的非线性土抗力−桩身侧向位移(p-)曲线,得到呈非线性变化的地基反力模量,同时引入 Pasternak 双参数地基模型充分考虑桩侧土体受力变形的连续性,推导了考虑桩−锚变形协调的支护桩挠曲微分方程,并利用传递矩阵法求得支护桩的内力与变形。结合工程实例编制计算程序,并将程序计算结果与监测值、基于传统 Winkler 地基模型的 p-y 曲线法计算结果对比分析,发现传统 Winkler 单参数地基模型会高估支护桩的水平变形和内力,而程序计算的位移和弯矩能更好地满足工程实际要求。进一步采用有限元软件对工程实例进行数值模拟分析,验证基于非线性 Pasternak 双参数地基模型的基坑支护桩计算方法的合理性和适用性。

关键词: 基坑, 支护桩, p-y曲线, Pasternak双参数地基模型, 传递矩阵法

Abstract: As a direct retaining structure in the process of foundation pit excavation, the internal force and deformation of pile under horizontal load have great influence on the safety and economy of foundation pit engineering. In order to calculate the internal force and deformation of the supporting pile more accurately, the nonlinear foundation reaction modulus is obtained according to the nonlinear soil resistance-pile lateral displacement (p-y) curve of pile-soil interaction. At the same time, the Pasternak two-parameter foundation model is introduced to fully consider the continuity of pile side soil deformation. The differential equation of retaining pile deflection considering pile-anchor deformation coordination is derived, and the internal force and deformation of the retaining pile are obtained by the transfer matrix method. Then the calculation program is compiled based on the engineering example, and the calculation results of the program are compared with the monitoring values and the calculation results of the p-y curve method based on the traditional Winkler foundation model. It is found that the traditional Winkler foundation model will overestimate the horizontal deformation and internal force of the retaining pile. The displacement and bending moment calculated by the program can better meet the actual requirements of the project. Furthermore, the finite element software is used for numerical simulation analysis of the engineering example to verify the rationality and applicability of the calculation method of foundation pit supporting piles based on the nonlinear Pasternak two-parameter foundation model.

Key words: foundation pit, retaining pile, p-y curve, Pasternak two-parameter foundation model, transfer matrix method

中图分类号: TU473
[1] 金国龙, 李鸿桥, 谢雄耀, . 圆形地连墙分载法受力计算理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 81-91.
[2] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 鲁泰山, 李洪江, 段伟, . 基于孔压静力触探原位测试的基坑围护结构变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[3] 任连伟, 王书彪, 孔纲强, 杨权威, 邓岳保. 综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 573-581.
[4] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[5] 田抒平, 王振钰, 张陈蓉, . 大直径单桩基础海上风机非线性共振特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 156-164.
[6] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[7] 李涛, 舒佳军, 王彦龙, 陈前. 基于模态分解方法的深基坑支护桩水平变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 496-506.
[8] 魏星, 陈睿, 程世涛, 朱明, 王子健, . 成都膨胀土地区深基坑降雨稳定性分析与变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 525-534.
[9] 易顺, 陈健, 潘家军, 王艳丽, 徐晗, 刘春鹏, . 内撑式基坑围护结构水平变形的表征函数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 568-578.
[10] 肖荣军, 马威, 李锋, 袁丽云. 一种深基坑排桩支护结构内力位移矩阵分析法 解答及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 579-595.
[11] 薛秀丽, 谢伟睿, 廖欢, 曾超峰, 陈宏波, 徐长节, 韩磊, . 邻近深埋地铁车站水−土阻隔效应及其对基坑抽水致沉的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2786-2796.
[12] 薛秀丽, 刘治珩, 曾超峰, 白 宁, 陈宏波. 开挖前抽水条件下基坑围挡两侧非极限土压力计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1699-1708.
[13] 雷国平, 苏栋, 程马遥, 刘慧芬, 张维, . 基于被动区土弹簧刚度降低过程的基坑围护结构计算增量法及软化p-y 曲线[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 797-808.
[14] THENDAR Yoshua, LIM Aswin. 考虑地下连续墙接缝的深基坑RFD系统研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3717-3727.
[15] 吴小锋, 张笛, 李星, 汪玉冰, 文凯, . 可液化场地桩基震后水平变形预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 77-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!